Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print February 21, 2007.
Biol Reprod 2007, 10.1095/biolreprod.107.060095
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
76/6/1009    most recent
biolreprod.107.060095v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jantra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Paulesu, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jantra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Paulesu, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jantra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Paulesu, L.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 76, 1009–1015 (2007)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.107.060095
© 2007 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


research-article

Interleukin 1 in Oviductal Tissues of Viviparous, Oviparous, and Ovuliparous Species of Amphibians1

Silke Jantra 3, Elisa Bigliardi 4, Rossana Brizzi 5, Francesca Ietta 3, Nicoletta Bechi 3, and Luana Paulesu 2 3

Department of Physiology,3 Division of Immunoendocrinology and Reproductive Physiology and Department of Evolutionary Biology,4 University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy Department of Animal Biology and Genetics,5 University of Florence, 55127 Florence, Italy

ABSTRACT

In previous reports, we have shown that interleukin 1 (IL1), a cytokine associated with implantation in mice, is also expressed in reproductive tissues of viviparous squamate reptiles and cartilaginous fishes. In the present study, we investigated the expression of IL1B and its functional membrane receptor type I (IL1R1) in amphibians, a class of vertebrates that is characterized by different reproductive modes, including internal and external fertilization. In particular, we investigated the oviductal tissues of the aplacental viviparous Salamandra lanzai, the oviparous Triturus carnifex, and the ovuliparous Bufo bufo. In immunohistochemistry with anti-human IL1B and IL1R1 polyclonal antibodies we found that in S. lanzai, most cells in the uterine mucosa were immunoreactive for IL1B and IL1R1. In T. carnifex, IL1B and IL1R1 were present in ciliated luminal cells, and there was evidence of IL1B in glandular cells. In B. bufo, the expression of IL1B and IL1R1 was limited to the apical cytoplasm of the ciliated oviductal cells. Western blot analysis showed that a putative mature form of IL1B, similar to that seen in mammals, was present in the oviductal tissues of S. lanzai, whereas different forms, which probably correspond to an inactive pro-IL1B protein, were found in T. carnifex and B. bufo. A band that corresponded to the predicted 80-kDa human IL1R1 was found in S. lanzai and T. carnifex. Although the present study shows that IL1B and IL1R1 expression occurs in all reproductive modes, the differential expression patterns noted between ovuliparity and oviparity and viviparity may reflect the different roles of IL1 in the various reproductive modes.

cytokines, female reproductive tract, fertilization, immunology, oviduct

INTRODUCTION

Viviparity is a reproductive mode that involves retention of the embryo within the female reproductive tract. Although viviparity is sometimes viewed as a typical mammalian phenomenon, many other groups of vertebrates (excepting agnathans and birds) include live-bearing species. In general, fishes, amphibians, and reptiles present various degrees of oviparity and viviparity [15]. Viviparity may involve the formation of a placenta, a structure formed by the apposition of extraembryonic membranes (chorion, allantois, yolk sac) and the maternal uterus [6, 7]. In anamniotes, yolk sac placentation is present in a few elasmobranch fishes of the family Triakidae [8], while there are no literature reports of placental structures in amphibians [911].

Although viviparity represents an evolutionary advantage for the developing embryo, it also represents a great risk for the embryo, which can be rejected by maternal tissues and thus not reach complete maturation [12]. Indeed, the semiallogeneic embryo bears antigens of paternal origin and thus, viviparity can be considered as a complex conflict between the selfish genes of the mother and those of her mate [13, 14]. Most studies on materno-fetal immunotolerance have been performed on murine and human placentas [13]. Among the immunological mechanisms proposed, the local secretion and action of cytokines at the materno-fetal interface appear to play a major role [15, 16].

Cytokines are peptides or glycopeptides with important activities in immune and inflammatory reactions [17]. Interleukin 1 (IL1) is a cytokine whose importance has been widely documented in human and murine reproduction [18]. Interestingly, data from mice show that blockage of the functional IL1 membrane receptor (IL1R1) prevents blastocyst implantation, which suggests a critical role for this cytokine in murine pregnancy [19].

Previously, we have shown that IL1 is present in the reproductive tissues of nonmammalian vertebrates, including squamate reptiles and cartilaginous fishes [2022]. In particular, we have demonstrated that the IL1 system, including the IL1A and IL1B isoforms and the functional membrane receptor IL1R1, is expressed by the chorio-allantoic placenta of a squamate reptile, Chalcides chalcides, and by the yolk sac placenta of an elasmobranch fish, Mustelus canis [20, 21]. IL1 is also expressed in the uterine mucosa of Lacerta vivipara, which is a squamate reptile with both oviparous and viviparous populations [23].

In the present study, we examined the expression of IL1B and IL1R1 in the oviductal tissues of some amphibians, a vertebrate class that includes species with various reproductive modes [2]. Although many species exhibit external fertilization (ovuliparous, as defined by Blüm [24]), many other amphibians have internal fertilization and are oviparous or viviparous. The coexistence within the same class (Amphibia) of species with such different evolutionary stages of reproduction means that these vertebrates are a good experimental model to investigate the role of immunoregulatory factors, such as cytokines, in materno-fetal immunotolerance.

To evaluate the expression of IL1 in amphibians with different reproductive modes, we used the following species: the aplacental viviparous urodele Salamandra lanzai, in which embryos are retained until full metamorphosis; the oviparous urodele Triturus carnifex, which lays eggs soon after fertilization; and the ovuliparous anuran Bufo bufo, which lays eggs before fertilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and Sample Collection

Five females each of B. bufo and T. carnifex were collected in their natural habitat (environs of Florence, Tuscany, Italy) during the reproductive season from March 2005 through April 2005. The effective laying condition of the females was confirmed by the occurrence of at least some oocytes inside the oviducts. Four gravid females (with early embryos) of S. lanzai were collected in October 2005 (Pian del Re, Monviso, Lombardy, Italy).

Immediately after being transported to the laboratory, the animals were killed by deep anesthesia with 0.2% chlorobutanol. The body was then opened by a mid-ventral incision and the oviducts were isolated. Only the caudal portion of each oviduct was collected for the present study. In the ovuliparous species, this portion, which opens into the cloaca, is the region in which the unfertilized eggs are stored as clusters or strings before deposition. In the oviparous and viviparous species, the corresponding portion (known as the uterus) is where the eggs are fertilized and in the viviparous species, it is where embryonic development takes place. The caudal portion of the right oviduct was fixed in 10% buffered neutral formalin for 24 h, washed in running water for 12 h, and then dehydrated and embedded in paraffin wax for routine histological (hematoxylin-eosin; H&E), periodic acid, and Schiff reagent (PAS) followed by Mayer hemalum and orange G [25] or immunohistochemical staining. The caudal portion of the left oviduct was frozen and stored at –80°C until Western blot analysis.

The experiments and animal captures were performed with the approval of the institutional committees and the Italian Ministry of the Environment (DPN/2D/2006/16274).

Immunohistochemistry

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned at 5-µm thickness. Only histologically normal tissues, as assessed by H&E staining, were processed for immunohistochemistry.

After deparaffinization and rehydration, the histological sections were washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 150 mM NaCl) and preincubated for 20 min with normal rabbit serum (DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark) diluted 1:10 in TBS, to prevent nonspecific binding. The slides were incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary polyclonal antibodies: goat anti-human IL1B (50 µg/ml in TBS) or anti-human IL1R1 (50 µg/ml in TBS) (R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK). The slides were then washed three times with TBS for 5 min, and incubated for 30 min with rabbit anti-goat biotinylated secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:500 (DAKO). After three washes for 5 min in TBS, the sections were incubated for 30 min with streptavidin complex/AP (DAKO) diluted 1:300. The reaction was revealed using naphthol and new fuchsin as substrate. Endogenous alkaline phosphatase was blocked by adding 1 mM levamisole to the substrate solution. Negative controls were performed for each species by substituting the primary antibody with TBS. Moreover, the specificity of the IL1B antibody was confirmed by incubation overnight at 4°C with the specific antigen, recombinant human IL1B (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at a molar ratio of 1:1, before using it for tissue staining.

Sections were examined and assessed using the following semi-quantitative ranking system: –, unstained; +/–, weak staining; +, moderate staining; ++, intense staining.

Extraction of IL1B Protein

Frozen oviductal tissues were homogenized twice for 60 s on ice in chilled RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 100 mM vanadate, 0.01% protease inhibitor cocktail [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO]) using a TURAX homogenizer. After centrifugation at 12 000 x g for 10 min at 4°C, the supernatant was assayed for total protein content (Bradford; Bio-Rad) and stored at –80°C until Western blot analysis.

Extraction of IL1R1 Membrane Protein

Frozen oviductal tissues were homogenized twice for 60 s on ice in chilled extraction buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 1 mM MgCl2, 0.01% protease inhibitor cocktail [Sigma]) using a TURAX homogenizer. Equal volumes of sucrose solution (0.25 M sucrose, 5 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 1 mM MgCl2) were added to the homogenate, followed by centrifugation at 500 x g for 5 min. The supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 16 000 x g for 30 min to separate the membrane fraction. The latter was resuspended in PBS and the membrane-bound receptor proteins were solubilized by incubating the membrane fraction with an equal volume of 16 mM CHAPS for 30 min at 4°C, followed by ultracentrifugation at 150 000 x g for 60 min [26]. The supernatant was assayed for total protein content (Bradford; Bio-Rad) and stored at –80°C until Western blot analysis.

Gel Electrophoresis and Western Blotting

Appropriate volumes of protein extracts, adjusted to represent the equivalent amounts of total protein (50 µg of total protein), were separated under reducing conditions at room temperature using the NuPage Novex kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) on polyacrylamide gels (12% for IL1B and 7% for IL1R1). After electrophoretic transfer to a PVDF membrane (Hybond-P; Amersham, Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK) at 100 V for 1 h at 4°C, the membranes were incubated in blocking solution (BS; 5% [wt:vol] fat-free dry milk in 10 mM PBS [pH 7.4], 0.15 M NaCl, 0.1% [vol:vol] Tween-20) for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were incubated at 4°C overnight with agitation in the presence of goat anti-human IL1B polyclonal antibody (R&D Systems) or goat anti-human IL1R1 polyclonal antibody (R&D Systems) at a dilution of 1:1000 in BS. After three washes with 0.1% PBST for 10 min each, the secondary antibody, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated rabbit anti-goat antibody, was applied at a dilution of 1:1000, and the signals on the membranes were detected by the West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL).

RESULTS

General Organization of the Caudal Portions of the Oviducts

In the aplacental viviparous S. lanzai, histological analysis of the uterus during early pregnancy revealed that the uterine wall contained numerous (often branching) folds separated by deep furrows (Fig. 1A). It consisted of three layers: an inner monolayered luminal epithelium, a thick layer of connective tissue, and an outer sheath of circular and longitudinal muscle fibers (Fig. 1A). The well-developed connective tissue was highly vascularized, and an extensive capillary network extended beneath the uterine lining. The latter comprised a monolayer of cuboidal or columnar cells of a single cell type. Their nuclei were basal and intensely heterochromatic, while the apical regions of most of the cells contained numerous ovoid PAS positive vesicles (Fig. 1B).


Figure 01
View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 1. Cross-sections of the caudal portions of the oviducts of S. lanzai (A, B), T. carnifex (C, D), and B. bufo (E, F). A) In S. lanzai, the uterine wall is formed by a monolayered epithelium (e), an extensive connective layer (c) and a muscle sheath (m). B) For S. lanzai, note the PAS-positive mucous substances in the apical regions of many epithelial cells (arrowhead) and in the capillaries (arrow) just beneath the uterine lining. C, D) In T. carnifex, the oviductal plicae are covered with voluminous secretory cells (asterisks) and ciliated elements (arrows). E, F) In B. bufo, the oviductal wall is made up of tubular secretory glands (asterisks) and groups of epithelial cells (arrow). The arrowhead points to a capillary. A,CF) H&E staining. B) PAS followed by Mayer haemalum and orange G staining.

For the females of T. carnifex, which were collected during the reproductive season, cross-sections of the caudal portions of the oviducts revealed numerous radial plicae that projected towards the oviductal lumen (Fig. 1C). The luminal lining consisted of two cell types: columnar cells with basal nuclei filled with secretory material in their central and apical cytoplasm, and numerous ciliated cells inserted among the columnar cells (Fig. 1, C and D). The epithelial cells adhered to a thin sheet of connective tissue that formed the axis of each plica. A very thin layer of poorly vascularized connective and muscle tissue formed the outermost portion of the oviductal wall (Fig. 1C).

In the females of most anurans, such as B. bufo, the major component of the caudal portion of the oviductal wall is a high palisade of tubular jelly glands that open along the oviductal lumen (Fig. 1E). The glands consisted of cells with basal nuclei and abundant secretory products, which were almost transparent and weakly eosinophilic. At the luminal surface, cuboidal or low columnar ciliated epithelial cells were grouped to form shallow cup-shaped profiles between the glands (Fig. 1F). A blood vessel was present at the base of each group of ciliated cells. The outermost portion of the oviductal wall was formed by an extremely thin layer of poorly vascularized connective and muscle tissues.

Immunohistochemistry

Marked differences were noted between the viviparous, oviparous, and ovuliparous species with regard to immunostaining for IL1B and IL1R1 (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
TABLE 1. Immunoreactivity for IL1B and IL1R1 in oviductal tissues of amphibians during the reproductive season.*

S. lanzai. Immunohistochemistry for IL1B in the uterine wall showed strong and widespread immunoreactivity in the luminal epithelial cells, mostly in their basal portions and in the nuclei (Fig. 2A). The apical regions of the cells, which contained large amounts of secretory products, were unstained. Intense IL1B immunoreactivity was also detected in many cells of the connective tissue, in the endothelial cells of the uterine blood vessels, and in the muscle layer (Fig. 2A). IL1R1 was expressed in the luminal epithelial cells, mostly in the basolateral cytoplasm and on the luminal surface (Fig. 2B). The nucleus and the apical (secretory) compartment were mostly unstained. Connective cells, vascular endothelium, and numerous muscle cells were positively stained.


Figure 02
View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 2. Immunohistochemical localization of IL1B (A, C, E) and IL1R1 (B, D, F) in oviductal tissues of S. lanzai (A, B), T. carnifex (C, D), and B. bufo (E, F). Positive staining is shown in red. A) The expression of IL1B is intense and widespread in the luminal epithelial cells, mainly in the basal portion (large arrows) and in the nucleus (asterisk in the insert). Cells of connective tissues (bifurcated arrows) and endothelial cells of the blood vessels (thin arrows) are also highly immunoreactive. The apical portions of the epithelial cells are completely unstained (arrowhead). B) Strong immunoreactivity for IL1R1 in the basolateral and perinuclear portions of most luminal epithelial cells (large arrows) and in the cells of the connective tissue (bifurcated arrow). The apical portions of the luminal cells are unstained (arrowhead). C) IL1B immunoreactivity is present in the ciliated epithelial cells (big arrows) and, to some extent, in the cytoplasm of the secretory cells (thin arrow). Secretory granules are unstained. Insert shows intranuclear immunoreactivity in ciliated epithelial cells (arrowhead). D) IL1R1 immunoreactivity is mainly present in the luminal portions of ciliated cells (large arrows). No staining is detected in the nuclei. IL1B (E) and IL1R1 (F) immunoreactivities are confined to the upper portions of the ciliated epithelial cells (large arrows), whereas the glands are completely unstained. Note the immunoreactivities for IL1B and IL1R1 in the blood vessel at the base of the ciliated epithelial cells (arrowheads). G, H) Control sections of S. lanzai (G) and T. carnifex (H). No staining is observed when the anti-IL1B or anti-IL1R1 primary antibodies are substituted with Tris-buffered saline.

T. carnifex. Immunoreactivity for IL1B was detected in the ciliated luminal cells (Fig. 2C). Some immunoreactivity was also present in the cytoplasm of some glandular cells, as well as in some muscle cells. Low-level immunoreactivity was observed in the connective tissue, whereas the secretory granules were unstained (Fig. 2C). IL1R1 was present mainly in the luminal portions of numerous ciliated epithelial cells (Fig. 2D). Evidence of immunostaining was also observed in the basolateral areas of some secretory cells, in the endothelia of the blood vessels, and in the muscle layer. The nuclei of secretory and ciliated cells were unstained.

B. bufo. IL1B was detected in a very thin portion of the apical cytoplasm of the ciliated epithelial cells (Fig. 2E). Some immunoreactivity was detected in the endothelia of the vessels at the base of the groups of ciliated cells. No staining was observed in the large glandular portion of the oviductal wall or in the muscle layer.

Similarly, IL1R1 expression was detected in the luminal membrane of the ciliated epithelial cells (Fig. 2F). Slight immunoreactivity was observed in the blood vessels at the base of the ciliated cells and in the muscle sheet beneath the peritoneal layer. Control sections for all three species did not reveal any specific positive staining for IL1B or IL1R1 (Fig. 2, G and H).

Western Blot Analyses

We performed Western blot analyses on oviductal tissue lysates of S. lanzai, T. carnifex, and B. bufo to identify the molecular masses of the immunoreactive IL1B and IL1R1 proteins (Fig. 3, A and B)


Figure 03
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
FIG. 3. Western blot profiles. A) IL1B in oviductal tissue lysates from S. lanzai, T. carnifex, and B. bufo. Recombinant human IL1B (rIL1B, positive control). The positions of the molecular weight markers are indicated. Two bands are detected for human rIL1B, corresponding to the predicted mature 17-kDa form and the dimeric 34-kDa form. In S. lanzai, the putative IL1B has a molecular mass of about 20 kDa, whereas in B. bufo and in T. carnifex, the anti-human polyclonal antibody recognizes a protein of about 31 kDa, which is probably pro-IL1B. Note that a band of approximately 12 kDa appears in all three amphibian species. B) IL1R1 in oviductal tissues of S. lanzai, T. carnifex, and B. bufo. Human placenta (Pl) at term is used as a positive control. The position of the molecular weight marker is indicated. A band that corresponds to the 80-kDa human IL1R1 is detected in the human placenta, as well as in S. lanzai and T. carnifex. No band is detected in B. bufo.

IL1B. Total proteins (50 µg) from each species were run in parallel with human rIL1B (Fig. 3A). Two bands were detected for IL1B, which correspond to the predicted 17-kDa mature form and the 34-kDa dimeric form. In oviductal tissues of S. lanzai, the polyclonal anti-human antibody recognized a putative IL1B protein of about 20 kDa, which most likely corresponds to the mature form of IL1B in this species. In B. bufo and T. carnifex, one band was observed at approximately 31 kDa, which probably corresponds to a pro-IL1B protein [27, 28]. An additional band at approximately 12 kDa was detected in all three amphibian species.

IL1R1. Total membrane proteins (50 µg) from each species were run in parallel with 30 µg of human placenta lysates at term (positive control) (Fig. 3B). A band that corresponds to the predicted 80-kDa human IL1R1 was revealed in human placental tissue, as well as in S. lanzai and T. carnifex. No band was detected in B. bufo.

DISCUSSION

IL1 is a key regulator of the inflammatory response and plays important roles in reproductive processes [29, 30]. Two forms of IL1 agonists (IL1A and IL1B) bind to the same membrane receptor (IL1R1) and have similar, if not identical, biological activities [31]. The third member of the IL1 ligand family is the natural IL1 receptor antagonist (IL1RN), which can block the binding of IL1 agonists to the specific membrane receptor, thereby inhibiting signal transduction [32]. Numerous studies have shown the contribution of the IL1 system to uterine receptivity in mammals [33, 34]. In humans, IL1B and IL1R1 have been detected in the endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle, with maximal expression of protein and mRNA during the luteal phase, which is the period of embryonic implantation [35]. More recently [36], expression of the IL1 system, which includes IL1B, IL1RN, and IL1R1, has been demonstrated in the fallopian tubes, which are the sites of oocyte fertilization and early embryonic development. Similarly, studies in mice have shown that the IL1 system is expressed by the uterus, with maximal expression during the peri-implantation period [37]. Interestingly, animal experiments have shown that blockage of the IL1 receptor by intraperitoneal injection of IL1RN from Day 3 to Day 6 of pregnancy (the time of blastocyst implantation) inhibits embryonic implantation in mice [19]. It has been reported that IL1RN interferes with embryonic attachment via a direct effect on the endometrial epithelium as a result of downregulation of integrins {alpha}4, {alpha}5, and ß3 [38]. These data suggest that the IL1 system plays a critical role in maternal receptivity to the semi-allogeneic embryo.

In the last ten years, we have conducted an evolutionary study of the reproductive tissues of nonmammalian vertebrates, including squamate reptiles and elasmobranch fishes, in which different forms of placentation have evolved [20, 21]. We have also studied L. vivipara, a species that is characterized by reproductive bimodality with oviparous and viviparous populations, depending on the habitat [23]. We have shown that the IL1 system, including the two IL1 isoforms and the specific membrane receptor IL1R1, is expressed by the uterine mucosa irrespective of the reproductive mode [39].

In the present study, we detected expression of the IL1 system in the oviductal tissues of amphibians, a class of vertebrates in which the role of cytokines in reproduction has never been investigated. Amphibians include species with internal fertilization, in which the fertilized eggs merely transit through the uterus (oviparity) or are retained for some time or until full development of the embryo (viviparity) [2, 3, 10, 24]. In all these species, paternal-derived antigens are in contact with maternal reproductive tissues, albeit for different periods of time. Amphibians also include species in which the eggs are fertilized outside the female body (ovuliparity) and thus, paternal antigens do not come into contact with the maternal tissues. Given their various reproductive modes, amphibians are of particular interest for studies on the roles of cytokines, e.g., IL1, in the evolutionary transition towards viviparity.

To investigate the role of IL1 in amphibian reproduction, we evaluated the expression of IL1B and its functional membrane receptor IL1R1 in oviductal tissues of the viviparous S. lanzai, the oviparous T. carnifex, and the ovuliparous B. bufo.

In S. lanzai, most of the cells in the uterine mucosa were immunoreactive for IL1B and IL1R1. These included the epithelial cells lining the uterine lumen, the cells of the underlying connective tissue, and numerous blood vessels. Expression of IL1R1 in the epithelial cells was mainly localized to the basolateral cytoplasm and the luminal surface. In T. carnifex, the ciliated cells intercalated with the glandular cells showed immunoreactivities for IL1B and IL1R1. Evidence of IL1B was also found in glandular cells, mainly in the nucleus. The connective tissue was very scarce and did not show significant immunoreactivity. In the ovuliparous B. bufo, the expression of IL1B and IL1R1 was limited to the apical cytoplasm of the ciliated epithelial cells.

Our findings are the first evidence of expression of the IL1 system in the oviductal tissues of amphibians and, more interestingly, of vertebrates with external fertilization. In species with external fertilization, there is no contact with paternal-derived antigens. However, in ovuliparity, as in oviparity and viviparity, the reproductive tract undergoes hormonally mediated cyclical changes, particularly by means of steroid modulation [2, 40, 41], to ensure that ovulation and egg envelope formation occur. Therefore, the expression of the IL1 system in reproductive tissues of vertebrate species with external fertilization may be an integral part of this hormonal control. Moreover, it is noteworthy that the caudal portion of the oviduct readily comes in contact with antigens in the aqueous environment. Therefore, the expression of IL1 and of its functional membrane receptor in the oviductal epithelial lining may suggest a mucosal immune response to environmental antigens, possibly mediated by IL1.

In both oviparity and viviparity, paternal-derived antigens are present in the maternal reproductive tract when: 1) the spermatophore is stored inside the female reproductive apparatus, and 2) when the fertilized eggs transit through the cloacal lumen or are retained in the maternal uterus until full or partial embryonic development. In terms of immune challenge, these two reproductive modes differ with regard to the duration of exposure of maternal tissues to paternal antigens. Our present study of amphibians shows that IL1B and IL1R1 expression is present in oviparity and in viviparity, which suggests a common role for the IL1 system in species with internal fertilization, which is potentially crucial for the maternal immune response to paternal-derived antigens.

In the Western blot analyses, we showed that a putative mature form of IL1B of approximately 20 kDa was present in the oviductal tissues of S. lanzai, whereas a different form of approximately 31 kDa, which likely corresponds to an inactive pro-IL1B protein, was detected in T. carnifex and B. bufo. In amphibians, the gene for IL1B has been cloned from Xenopus laevis and shown to have high (48%) homology with the corresponding human gene [42, 43]. Furthermore, IL1 bioactivity has been reported in the same species, in different cell types, including peritoneal cells and thymocytes [44]. Jelaso et al. have demonstrated in embryos of X. laevis the presence of a putative IL1B protein, with molecular masses of 17 kDa and 31 kDa for the mature and precursor forms, respectively [45]. Our current findings show a putative mature form of IL1B in the oviductal tissues of S. lanzai and a putative pro-IL1B in T. carnifex and B. bufo, which together may indicate an active biological role for IL1B in the reproductive processes of viviparous species. Further studies are required to define the bioactive form of IL1B in the reproductive tissues of vertebrates with different reproductive modalities.

An immunoreactive band of 80 kDa that corresponds to the putative IL1 type I receptor was detected in both S. lanzai and T. carnifex, which suggests a potential role for IL1B in the oviductal tissues of these amphibian species. The scarce IL1R1 immunoreactivity in B. bufo, being confined to the outermost portion of the ciliated epithelial cells, may explain the lack of a band that corresponds to a putative IL1R1 in the oviductal tissues of this ovuliparous species.

The present study provides the first evidence of an immunological response, mediated by cytokines, in the female reproductive tissues of amphibians during the reproductive phase. We hypothesize that the observed variations in cytokine expression reflect the different roles these molecules play in the various reproductive modes. In external fertilization, expression of the IL1 system can be a sign of uterine mucosal immune response to antigens present in the aqueous environment. This response is amplified in oviparity and viviparity, possibly because of the presence of paternal-derived antigens in the maternal reproductive tissues. On these bases, it can be speculated that the IL1 system is an important mediator of the evolution from ovuliparity to viviparity.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Dr. Peter Christie for careful linguistic revision.

FOOTNOTES

1Supported by research grants from the University of Siena (PAR Projects 2005). Back

Correspondence: 2Luana Paulesu, Department of Physiology, Immunology of Reproduction, University of Siena, Via Aldo Moro, 53100 Siena, Italy. FAX: 39 0577 234219; e-mail: paulesu{at}unisi.it

Received: 11 January 2007.

First decision: 30 January 2007.

Accepted: 20 February 2007.

REFERENCES

  1. Wourms JP and Lombardi J. Reflections on the evolution of piscine viviparity. Amer Zool 1992; 32:276–293
  2. Biology of Amphibians. Duellman W and Trueb L. 1986.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company;
  3. Wake MH and Dickie R. Oviduct structure and function and reproductive modes in amphibians. J Exp Zool 1998; 282:477–506[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Wake MH. Evolution of oviductal gestation in amphibians J Exp Zool 1993; 266:394–413[CrossRef]
  5. Blackburn DG. Reptilian viviparity: past research, future directions, and appropriate models. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A 2000; 127:391–409[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Marshall's Physiology of Reproduction, vol. 2, 3rd ed. Amoroso EC. Placentation. 1952:London: Longmans Green;127–311. In:
  7. Dantzer V and Paulesu L. Comparative biology of the vertebrate placenta—a workshop report. Placenta 2002; 23:133–135[CrossRef]
  8. Hamlett WC, Eulitt AM, Jarrell RL, Kelly MA. Uterogestation and placentation in elasmobranchs. J Exp Zool 1993; 266:347–367[CrossRef]
  9. Greven H. Survey of the oviduct of salamandrids with special reference to the viviparous species. J Exp Zool 1998; 282:507–525[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Greven H and Guex GD. Structural and physiological aspects of viviparity in Salamandra salamandra. Mertensiella 1994; 4:139–160
  11. Joly F, Chesnel F, Boujard D. Biological adaptations and reproductive strategies in the genus Salamandra. Mertensiella 1994; 4:255–269
  12. Medawar PB. Some immunological and endocrinological problems raised by the evolution of viviparity in vertebrates. Symp Soc Exp Biol 1953; 7:320–338
  13. Human Implantation: Cell Biology and Immunology. Loke YW and King A. 1995.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
  14. Crespi B and Semeniuk C. Parent-offspring conflict in the evolution of vertebrate reproductive mode. Am Nat 2004; 163:635–653[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Paulesu L. Cytokines in mammalian reproduction and speculation about their possible involvement in nonmammalian viviparity. Microsc Res Tech 1997; 38:188–194[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Saito S. Cytokine cross-talk between mother and the embryo/placenta. J Reprod Immunol 2001; 52:15–33[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. The Cytokine Handbook, 2nd ed. Vilcek J and Le J. Immunology of cytokines: an introduction. 1994:London: Academic Press;1–19. In:
  18. Krussel JS, Bielfeld P, Polan ML, Simon C. Regulation of embryonic implantation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 110(suppl 1):S2–9[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Simon C, Frances A, Piquette GN, Danasouri IE, Zurawski G, Dang W, Polan ML. Embryonic implantation in mice is blocked by interleukin-1 receptor antagonist. Endocrinology 1994; 134:521–528[Abstract]
  20. Paulesu L, Romagnoli R, Marchetti M, Cintorino M, Ghiara P, Guarino FM, Ghiara G. Cytokines in the viviparous reproduction of squamate reptiles: Interleukin-1{alpha} (IL-1 {alpha}) and IL-1ß in placental structures of a skink. Placenta 1995; 16:193–205[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Cateni C, Paulesu L, Bigliardi E, Hamlett WC. The interleukin I (IL-I) system in the uteroplacental complex of a cartilaginous fish, the smoothhound shark, Mustelus canis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2003; 1:25–33[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Romagnoli R, Cateni C, Guarino FM, Bigliardi E, Paulesu L. Potential role of interleukin-1 at the peri-ovulation stage in a species of placental viviparous reptile, the three-toed skink, Chalcides chalcides (Squamata: Scincidae). Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2003; 1:60.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Heulin B, Osenegg K, Michel D. Demography of a bimodal reproductive species of lizard (Lacerta vivipara): survival and density characteristics of oviparous populations. Herpetologica 1997; 53:432–444
  24. Vertebrate Reproduction. Blüm V. 1986.Berlin: Springer Verlag;
  25. Manuale di Teciche Istologiche e Istochimiche. Mazzi V. 1977.Padova: Piccin;
  26. Jelaso AM, Acevedo S, Dang T, Lepere A, Ide CF. Interleukin-1 ß and its type 1 receptor are expressed in developing neural circuits in the frog, Xenopus laevis. J Comp Neurol 1998; 394:242–251[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Hong S, Zou J, Collet B, Bols NC, Secombes CJ. Analysis and characterisation of IL-1beta processing in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fish Shellfish Immunol 2004; 16:453–459[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Pelegrín P, Chaves-Pozo E, Mulero V, Meseguer J. Production and mechanism of secretion of interleukin-1 ß from the marine fish gilthead seabream. Dev Comp Immunol 2004; 28:229–237[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Dinarello CA. Biology of interleukin 1. FASEB J 1988; 2:108–115[Abstract]
  30. Paulesu L, Romagnoli R, Bigliardi E. Materno-fetal immunotolerance: is interleukin-1 {alpha} a fundamental mediator in placental viviparity? Dev Comp Immunol 2005; 29:409–415[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Dower SK, Kronheim SR, Hopp TP, Cantrell M, Deeley M, Gillis S, Henney CS, Urdal DL. The cell surface receptors for interleukin-1 alpha and interleukin-1 beta are identical. Nature 1986; 324:266–268[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Dinarello CA and Thomson RC. Blocking IL-1: interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in vivo and in vitro. Immunol Today 1991; 11:404–410
  33. Lindhart CA, Bentin-Ley U, Ravn V, Islin H, Hviid T, Rex S, Bangsboll S, Sorensen S. Biochemical evaluation of endometrial function at the time of implantation. Fertil Steril 2002; 78:221–233[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Fazleabas AT, Kim JJ, Strakova Z. Implantation: embryonic signals and the modulation of the uterine environment—a review. Placenta 2004; 25(suppl A):S26–31[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Simon C, Piquette GN, Frances A, Polan ML. Localization of interleukin-1 type I receptor and interleukin-1 ß in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993; 77:549–555[Abstract]
  36. Huang HY, Chan SH, Wu CH, Wang CW, Lai CH, Soong YK. Interleukin-1 system messenger ribonucleic acid and protein expression in human fallopian tube may be associated with ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2005; 84:1484–1492[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. De M, Sanford TR, Wood GV. Expression of interleukin-1, interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha in mouse uterus during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 97:83–89[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Simon C, Valbuena D, Krussel J, Bernal A, Murphy CR, Shaw T, Pellicer A, Polan ML. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist prevents embryonic implantation by a direct effect on the endometrial epithelium. Fertil Steril 1998; 70:896–906[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Paulesu L, Bigliardi E, Paccagnini E, Ietta F, Cateni C, Guillaume CP, Heulin B. Cytokines in the oviparity/viviparity transition: evidence of the interleukin-1 system in a species with reproductive bimodality, the lizard Lacerta vivipara. Evol Dev 2005; 7:282–288[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Hormones and Reproduction in Fishes, Amphibians and Reptiles. Xavier F. Functional morphology and regulation of the corpus luteum. 1987:New York: Plenum Press;241–282. In:
  41. Reproductive Biology and Physiology of Anura, vol. 2. Fernández SN and Ramos I. Endocrinology of reproduction. 2003:Enfield, New Hampshire: Science Publishers Inc;73–117. In:
  42. Zou J, Bird S, Minter R, Horton J, Cunningham C, Secombes CJ. Molecular cloning of the gene for interleukin-1ß from Xenopus laevis and analysis of expression in vivo and in vitro. Immunogenetics 2000; 51:332–338[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Bird S, Zou J, Wang T, Munday B, Cunningham C, Secombes CJ. Evolution of interleukin-1 ß. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2002; 13:483–502[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Watkins D, Parsons SC, Cohen N. A factor with interleukin-1-like activity is produced by exudate cells from the frog, Xenopus laevis. Immunology 1987; 62:669–673[Medline]
  45. Jelaso AM, Mackay D, Ide CF. Methylmercury decreases IL-1ß immunoreactivity in the nervous system of the developing frog Xenopus laevis. Neurotoxicology 1997; 18:841–850[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
76/6/1009    most recent
biolreprod.107.060095v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jantra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Paulesu, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jantra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Paulesu, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jantra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Paulesu, L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS