Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print February 1, 2006.
Biol Reprod 2006, 10.1095/biolreprod.105.049619
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
74/5/931    most recent
biolreprod.105.049619v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pielecka, J.
Right arrow Articles by Moenter, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pielecka, J.
Right arrow Articles by Moenter, S. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pielecka, J.
Right arrow Articles by Moenter, S. M.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 74, 931–937 (2006)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.049619
© 2006 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.

Research Article

Effect of Steroid Milieu on Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-1 Neuron Firing Pattern and Luteinizing Hormone Levels in Male Mice1

Justyna Pielecka , and Suzanne M. Moenter 2 

Departments of Internal Medicine and Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908

ABSTRACT

GnRH neuronal function is regulated by gonadal hormone feedback. In males, testosterone can act directly or be converted to either dihydrotestosterone (DHT) or estradiol (E2). We examined central steroid feedback by recording firing of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-identified GnRH neurons in brain slices from male mice that were intact, castrated, or castrated and treated with implants containing DHT, E2, or E2+DHT. Castration increased LH levels. DHT or E2 alone partially suppressed LH, whereas E2+DHT reduced LH to intact levels. Despite the inhibitory actions on LH, the combination of E2+DHT increased GnRH neuron activity relative to other treatments, reflected in mean firing rate, amplitude of peaks in firing rate, and area under the curve of firing rate vs. time. Cluster8 was used to identify peaks in firing activity that may be correlated with hormone release. Castration increased the frequency of peaks in firing rate. Treatment with DHT failed to reduce frequency of these peaks. In contrast, treatment with E2 reduced peak frequency to intact levels. The frequency of peaks in firing rate was intermediate in animals treated with E2+DHT, perhaps suggesting the activating effects of this combination partially counteracts the inhibitory actions of E2. These data indicate that E2 mediates central negative feedback in males primarily by affecting the pattern of GnRH neuron activity, and that androgens combined with estrogens have a central activating effect on GnRH neurons. The negative feedback induced by E2+DHT to restore LH to intact levels may mask an excitatory central effect of this combination.

estradiol, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, luteinizing hormone, steroid hormones

INTRODUCTION

GnRH neurons form the final common pathway regulating reproductive function. GnRH is released in pulses [1–3] that stimulate the synthesis and secretion of the pituitary gonadotropins LH and FSH and are required for fertility in both males and females [4–7]. Changes in GnRH, and resulting LH, pulse patterns are largely regulated by feedback actions of the steroids released by the ovaries or testes [8–16]. In males, testosterone is the predominant gonadal steroid in the circulation, but it is often converted in target tissues via aromatization to estradiol (E2) or via 5-alpha reduction to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) [17–19].

Although GnRH neurons express the beta isoform of the E2 receptor, many studies indicate that these cells lack the alpha isoform of the E2 receptor and androgen receptors [20–24]. This suggests that feedback effects from either steroid are likely indirect, mediated by steroid-sensitive neurons either locally within the hypothalamus or in distant brain regions. In this regard, both androgen and estrogen receptors are found in the hypothalamus of males [21, 25–27], and in other areas implicated in steroid feedback regulation [28–32]. GnRH neurons and immortalized GnRH neuronal GT1 cells have also been reported to express more recently described membrane-associated forms of both the estrogen and the androgen receptor, suggesting an alternative possibility for direct steroid feedback [33, 34].

There is evidence for both androgen and estrogen action in testosterone-mediated negative feedback. Estrogen action is suggested by suppression of LH by local hypothalamic implants containing E2 but not DHT [35, 36]. In patients lacking estrogen receptors or aromatase activity, LH release is elevated [37, 38]; mouse aromatase knockouts also exhibit elevated LH [39]. Androgen action is suggested by reductions in serum LH levels after systemic treatment with DHT in rodents, sheep, and primates [10, 13, 40]. Additionally, reduction of androgen receptors or blockade of 5-alpha reductase results in elevated LH levels [41, 42]. Reports of feedback actions in estrogen receptor {alpha} knock-out mice are mixed, with one study showing an elevation in LH in gonad-intact males [43], suggesting a role for the alpha isoform of the E2 receptor, but others showing no change [35, 44]. In one of the latter studies [44], castration increased, and high-dose DHT treatment reduced LH levels, suggesting androgen receptor-mediated negative feedback. In men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, testosterone and E2 similarly suppressed LH release from the pituitary in response to a known GnRH signal, suggesting either conversion to E2 or similar action of these two steroids at the pituitary in humans [45, 46]. In contrast, both E2 and dihydrotestosterone were reported to act centrally and not at the pituitary to affect negative feedback on the reproductive neuroendocrine system in sheep [15].

It is thus evident that a consensus has not yet emerged regarding the active steroid(s) mediating testosterone feedback. This may be in part because of species differences, but could also be because of differences in technical approach. Specifically, many studies probe feedback by examining LH levels, which represent the combined central and pituitary actions making positive identification of the site of feedback action difficult. In the present studies we investigated how steroid milieu affects the firing pattern of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-identified GnRH neurons to examine central actions, and compared this to LH levels of male mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

GnRH neurons were recorded from transgenic mice in which GFP is genetically targeted to GnRH neurons [47]. Mice were bred on the premises, housed on a 14L:10D cycle with lights off at 1630 h, and maintained on Harlan 2916 rodent chow (Harlan) and water ad libitum. All procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Virginia.

To examine the effect of steroid milieu on GnRH neurons, adult (>2 mo) male mice were castrated under isoflurane (Abbott Laboratories) anesthesia to remove testis feedback and at that time received steroid implants as described below. We first did a pilot study to determine the dose of DHT that restored seminal vesicle weight to intact levels by treating castrated mice with either one or two Silastic capsules (Dow Corning) containing 400 µg of the nonaromatizable androgen DHT. This pilot study indicated two capsules was the appropriate dose. For the main experiment, intact controls (n = 8 cells in five animals) were compared with castrated (cas, n = 8 cells in seven animals), cas+ E2 (0.625-µg capsule, n = 9 cells in eight animals) cas+DHT (two 400-µg capsules, n = 8 cells in six animals), or cas+E2+DHT (n = 9 cells in six animals). No more than two cells were used from each animal; each cell is considered individually because variation between cells from the same animal was similar to variation within the entire group. All hormones were administered in vivo and were not present in any recording solutions. Postoperative analgesia was provided by a long-acting local anesthetic (bupivacaine, 0.25%, 7.5 µl per site; Abbott Laboratories). Recordings were done 5–9 days after surgery. There was no difference in any parameter attributable to time after surgery and steroid replacement.

LH Immunoassay and Seminal Vesicle Weight

To confirm endocrine status, LH levels and seminal vesicles were examined. Body and seminal vesicle weight were measured and blood samples were collected at the time of brain slice preparation. LH levels were determined by a previously described modified supersensitive two-site sandwich immunoassay [48–50]. The limit of detection (three assays) averaged 0.14 ng/ml; intraassay coefficient of variation (CV) averaged 4.1% and interassay CV averaged 9.9%. E2 was measured by RIA (DSL 39100, Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc.). All samples were run in a single assay with a sensitivity of 1.7 pg/ml and an intraassay CV of 4.3%. Values produced by E2 implants (11.6 ± 1.5 pg/ml, n = 7) in castrates were not different (P > 0.05) from those in intact males (9.5 ± 0.6, n = 3)

Brain Slice Preparation and Recordings

Brain slices were prepared with slight modifications [51] of previous methods [52]. Cell membrane currents associated with action potential firing were recorded using a targeted extracellular recording approach as previously described [53]. The location of each GnRH neuron was mapped on sketches of coronal sections obtained from a mouse brain atlas [54]; no regional differences were observed in any firing parameter among the cells examined. The duration of recordings ranged from 44 to 210 min and was not different between groups (P > 0.10). If no activity was observed for 30 min, 15 mM KCl was added to the bath to check cell viability and recording integrity. If the cell did not respond to KCl, the data set was truncated at the time of last firing. If it fired in response to KCl, the data set was truncated for analysis at the time of adding KCl.

Data Analysis

Using custom programs [52] written for Igor Pro (Wavemetrics), events were counted and binned at 1-min intervals to identify changes in firing properties and at 5-min intervals for Cluster8 analysis to avoid oversampling errors in pulse detection. Cluster8 compares clusters of points by pooled t-testing to look for nadirs and peaks in time series data [55]. Using peak and nadir clusters of one and two points, respectively, peaks were identified and interpeak interval calculated.

Using Excel (Microsoft Corp.), recordings were analyzed for the following parameters: percentage of time in quiescence (≤1 event/min), longest duration of quiescence, mean firing rate, instantaneous frequency, area under the curve of frequency, and peak amplitude. Mean firing rate was determined by dividing the total number of events detected by the duration of the recording. Instantaneous frequency is the interval between action potentials converted to frequency. Area under the curve of frequency was determined using Igor Pro and the peak amplitude was calculated by Cluster8. For group comparison, data were log-transformed as needed for normalization and parameters were compared by one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis with Student-Newman-Keuls tests. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Pilot Study to Determine DHT Dose

Our previous work with DHT [56] established implants that mildly elevate androgen levels in females. To ensure a sufficient male androgen dose, seminal vesicle weight was compared among the treatment groups. Figure 1 shows the expected reduction in seminal vesicle weight with castration. Treatment with one 400-µg DHT capsule did not appear to restore seminal vesicle weight to intact levels (n = 2); thus, two capsules were used in further tests. Treatment of castrate mice with two 400-µg DHT capsules (n = 4 mice, P > 0.1 vs. n = 6 intact mice) restored seminal vesicle weight to intact levels. Although E2 only was not effective in restoring seminal vesicle weight (n = 8 mice, P < 0.05 vs. intact), the combination of E2+DHT elevated seminal vesicle weight slightly above intact levels.


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Pilot study to determine dose of DHT required to restore seminal vesicles to intact level. Mean ± SEM seminal vesicle weight (mg) normalized to body weight (g) in the different groups. Intact (n = 6 mice), castrate (cas, n = 6 mice), cas+2x 400 µg DHT (n = 4 mice), cas+400 µg DHT(n = 2 mice), cas+E2 (n = 8 mice), and cas+E2+DHT (n = 8 mice).

LH Levels Reflect Combined Central and Pituitary Steroid Feedback Effects

Serum LH was measured to determine the combined central and pituitary feedback effect of the various treatments (Fig. 2). As expected, castration significantly increased LH levels (P < 0.05). E2 (n = 8 mice) or DHT (n = 6 mice) alone partially suppressed LH levels (P < 0.05 vs. both intact [n = 5 mice] and castrate [n = 6 samples from seven mice; one sample was lost]), whereas LH levels in mice treated with both E2+DHT (n = 6) were not different from intact controls (P > 0.1). These data indicate that both E2 and DHT are required for complete negative feedback at the hypothalamo-pituitary level.


Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Mean ± SEM serum LH levels (ng/ml) in the same groups showing combined hypothalamic and pituitary feedback actions. Intact (n = 5 mice), castrate (cas; n = 6 mice), cas+DHT (n = 6 mice), cas+E2 (n = 8 mice), and cas+E2+DHT (n = 6 mice). Different letters over bars indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

Steroid Milieu Affects GnRH Neuron Firing Activity

By examining firing activity of GnRH neurons directly, we can determine how steroid milieu affects individual neurons without the possible confounding effect of pituitary-level feedback actions that alter the response to GnRH. Figure 3 shows examples of raw action current data. A representative action current is shown in Figure 3A. Figure 3, B and C, illustrates 1-min excerpts of raw firing data from two points (indicated by lowercase letters) on the firing rate curves of Figure 4, E2 and A, respectively. The pattern of action of current events is appreciably different between peaks and valleys in firing rate not only when peaks are high-amplitude (Figs. 3B and 4E) but also when peaks are low-amplitude (Figs. 3C and 4A).


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. Excerpts of raw firing data. A) Typical action current waveform illustrated by first action current from Figure 3Ba. B) One-minute excerpts of firing data from cas+E2+DHT example in Figure 4E at points (a and b) indicated. C) One-minute excerpts of firing data from intact example in Figure 4A at points (c and d) indicated. Bars in B apply to both B and C.


Figure 4
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4. Steroid milieu affects GnRH neuron firing activity. Representative plots of firing activity from each group plotted on the same scale to facilitate comparison. Endocrine treatment is shown on the upper left corner of each graph. Peaks in firing detected by the Cluster8 algorithm are indicated by asterisks. Lowercase letters indicate where excerpts shown in Figure 3 were obtained.

Figure 4 shows representative graphs of GnRH neuron firing activity in the different groups. All data are plotted on the same scale to facilitate comparison. Analysis (mean ± SEM) of various parameters of these data is presented in Figures 5 and 6. Records were evaluated for overall measures of GnRH neuron quiescence, defined as one or more event per minute. Neither percentage of time in quiescence nor maximum duration of quiescence was affected by any treatment (data not shown). Two measures of overall firing activity, mean firing rate and area under the curve of firing rate vs. time, were examined (Fig. 5, A and B). There was no difference in these parameters between intact, castrate, or castrate treated with E2 or DHT alone. In contrast, the combination of E2+DHT induced a marked increase in both of these parameters (P < 0.05). Instantaneous frequency, an indicator of high-frequency burst firing that is associated with more efficient hormone release [57], was increased by castration and by the combination of E2+DHT (both P < 0.05 vs. intact). Treatment with E2 or DHT alone produced values that were not different (P > 0.05) from either castrate or intact values.


Figure 5
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5. Effect of steroid milieu on measures of GnRH neuron firing activity (mean ± SEM). A) Mean firing rate. B) Area under the curve of frequency vs. time. C) Median instantaneous frequency. Different letters over bars indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). cas, Castrate.


Figure 6
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 6. Effect of steroid milieu on pattern of GnRH neuron firing detected by the Cluster8 algorithm (mean ± SEM). A) Peak frequency (peaks/h). B) Peak amplitude. Different letters over bars indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). cas, Castrate.

Low-frequency changes in GnRH neuron activity are an important facet of their function; the frequency with which a cell increases firing rate may be correlated with pulses of hormone release. Cluster8 analysis of firing rate data revealed that baseline activity (Cluster8 nadirs) was not affected by any treatment (P > 0.1, not shown). In contrast, castration significantly increased peaks/h (P < 0.05, Fig. 6A) relative to intact controls. E2 alone reduced peak frequency to control levels (P > 0.01 vs. intact). In contrast, DHT alone did not suppress peak frequency (P > 0.1 vs. castrate). Cotreatment with E2+DHT produced a peak frequency that was not different (P > 0.05) from that found in either intact or castrate mice. This may indicate that addition of DHT may partially counteract the suppressive effects of E2 alone. Amplitude of peaks in firing rate was not different among groups, with the exception of a marked elevation in cells of E2+DHT treated mice (P < 0.05, Fig. 6B).

DISCUSSION

Testosterone is the main circulating androgen in males and may be converted to E2 or DHT in target tissues [17–19]. The present results suggest that steroid feedback to the reproductive neuroendocrine system in males is both site- and steroid class-dependent. Specifically, E2 provides central negative feedback, whereas both E2 and DHT are required for negative feedback at the pituitary. Direct examination of individual GnRH neurons unmasked this same combination of E2 and DHT as activating at the central level.

A few previous studies have directly examined central actions of steroid feedback in males. Castration increases GnRH release in rats [13] and sheep [58], and testosterone replacement restores GnRH release to intact patterns. Most studies, however, have examined steroid feedback by measuring levels of the pituitary hormone LH [9, 10, 16, 59], which reflects both central and pituitary actions. Further, much previous work used testosterone replacement [10, 12, 14, 16], precluding conclusion with regard to the active steroid.

The present work supports and extends previous studies showing that castration increases LH levels in male mice. Centrally, the main effect of castration on GnRH neuron activity was on the pattern of firing. In this regard, GnRH neurons exhibit patterned firing activity with different frequencies. These include high-frequency, repeated bursts of firing [60–62], and low-frequency changes in firing rate [52, 60]. The interval between peaks in firing rate in the latter is similar to that between pulses of GnRH1/LH release [1–3]. Similar observations have been made examining calcium oscillations in GnRH neurons, with higher-frequency oscillations coordinating to form a lower-frequency rhythm with a period resembling that of GnRH1/LH release [63]. Both low- and high-frequency firing rhythms were affected by removal of gonadal feedback in the present study. Specifically, castration increased the frequency of peaks in firing rate that may be correlated with pulsatile hormone release, and the instantaneous frequency, which is a measure of burst firing. Castration had no effect on more general measures of GnRH neuron activity, such as mean firing rate. This parallels earlier work in ovariectomized and ovariectomized E2-treated females, in which overall activity did not change but the pattern of activity was significantly altered [52].

When castrated mice were treated with steroid replacement, the central and pituitary responses differed. Direct examination of GnRH neuron activity revealed that E2 alone, but not DHT, restored the low-frequency pattern of GnRH neuron activity to that of intact controls. This suggests that the primary negative feedback action of testosterone at the central level is accomplished after its aromatization to E2. Supporting this, E2 implants in the arcuate nucleus/ventromedial hypothalamus reduces LH pulse frequency in castrated sheep and primates [35, 36, 64], whereas localized implants of testosterone or DHT in the same area are ineffective [35, 64]. Further, immunization against E2 [9, 65] or aromatase inhibitors [66] causes increased LH secretion in gonadal intact rams and rats, and humans deficient in the alpha isoform of the E2 receptor or aromatase have elevated or high normal LH levels [37, 38].

Unlike the suppressive action of E2 alone or the lack of action of DHT alone, the combination of these two steroids activated individual GnRH neurons. We had hypothesized that replacing both E2 and DHT would mimic the intact condition. This expected suppressive effect of E2+DHT was observed on LH levels, but not when GnRH neuron activity was examined. These data suggest the possibility that the negative feedback effects at the pituitary mask a central stimulatory effect of combined estrogen and androgen receptor activation that was revealed by direct study of GnRH neurons. Such a masking effect has been observed previously with acute steroid treatment in vivo, but not to our knowledge with chronic feedback such as used in the present study [67, 68]. In considering this hypothesis, it is important to bear in mind two main caveats regarding the approach that was used. First, the activity of individual GnRH neurons may not reflect that of the network as a whole. Second, afferents important for conveying feedback effects to GnRH neurons may have been removed by the slicing procedure. With regard to these caveats, in other studies examining steroid feedback effects on firing activity of individual GnRH neurons, a direct correlation was found between firing activity and reproductive response [52, 69, 70].

At the pituitary, there is evidence that steroids alter response to GnRH, although the effect may depend on species [71]. In rodents in vivo, DHT reduced both serum LH and LH beta gene transcription in response to GnRH1 [48, 72–74]. Indeed, the negative feedback effect of DHT on LH levels in mice has been reported to be stronger (i.e., complete suppression) than that observed in the present study [44, 48], likely because of differences in doses. In dissociated rat pituitary cells, testosterone reduced, whereas E2 enhanced, response to GnRH1 [71, 75]. Together with the present data, these observations of direct pituitary negative feedback by androgens support the viability of the hypothesis that pituitary-level steroid negative feedback masks a central activating effect.

The central mechanisms underlying these observations are not known, but there are several possibilities. E2 can induce androgen receptors, perhaps increasing action of DHT [76]. Central synergism between E2 and DHT has previously been reported for the control of aromatase activity in the male rat hypothalamus [77]. Alternatively, in the intact male there may be a near-total conversion of testosterone to E2 in regions regulating GnRH neuron function, so that there is little to no endogenous activation of androgen receptors; E2+DHT treatment would raise the ratio of androgen to estrogen. The high levels of aromatase in male hypothalamus are consistent with this notion [19]. Another possibility is the conversion of DHT to diols that appear to interact specifically with the beta isoform of the estrogen receptor [78]. This is of interest because GnRH neurons have been reported to express mRNA for this isoform [21, 24], although protein has not yet been found in murine GnRH neurons [79]. Further, DHT alone had different effects on GnRH neuron firing activity in the present study than did the combination of E2+DHT.

The potential stimulatory action of E2+DHT in males is of interest with regard to hyperandrogenemic infertility in women. In these disorders, such as polycystic ovary syndrome, androgen-mediated increases in reproductive hypothalamo-pituitary axis activity occur [80]. The present studies suggest that androgens may also activate the central portion of the reproductive neuroendocrine axis in males. Mechanistically, this could be accomplished through changes in synaptic transmission to GnRH neurons, intrinsic properties of these cells, or both. In this regard, DHT elevates gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transmission to GnRH neurons in females [56]. GABAA receptor activation can be excitatory in GnRH neurons [81–83], and a preliminary report studying females indicates that firing rate of these cells is also elevated by DHT [70]. Consistent with a possible change in synaptic transmission, DHT, but not E2, increases dendritic spine density in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons in male rats [84].

Together, the present results indicate that E2 is the main hormone that provides negative feedback at the central level, whereas the pituitary requires both E2, acting centrally or directly, and DHT for a complete negative feedback effect. Future studies will explore the synaptic and intrinsic mechanisms underlying these effects, as well as the activating effects of these steroids in combination, to understand at which levels the feedback systems of males and females differ.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Catherine Christian, Zhiguo Chu, Debra Fisher, Alison Roland, and Pei-San Tsai for editorial comments.

FOOTNOTES

1 Supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development/National Institutes of Health through cooperative agreement U54HD28934 and the Ligand Assay and Analysis Core. A preliminary report of this work was presented at the 38th annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Reproduction, 24–27 July 2005, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. Back

2 Correspondence: Suzanne M. Moenter, Department of Internal Medicine, P.O. Box 800578, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908. FAX: 434 9820088; smm4n{at}virginia.edu Back

Received: 23 November 2005.

First decision: 8 December 2005.

Accepted: 31 January 2006.

REFERENCES

  1. Moenter SM, Brand RM, Midgley AR, Karsch FJ, Dynamics of gonadotropin-releasing hormone release during a pulse. Endocrinology 1992 130:503-510[Abstract]
  2. Levine JE, Bauer-Dantoin AC, Besecke LM, Conaghan LA, Legan SJ, Meredith JM, Strobl FJ, Urban JH, Vogelsong KM, Wolfe AM, Neuroendocrine regulation of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone pulse generator in the rat. Rec Prog Horm Res 1991 47:97-151 discussion 151-153
  3. Clarke IJ, Cummins JT, The temporal relationship between gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in ovariectomized ewes. Endocrinology 1982 111:1737-1739[Medline]
  4. Belchetz PE, Plant TM, Nakai Y, Keogh EJ, Knobil E, Hypophysial responses to continuous and intermittent delivery of hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Science 1978 202:631-633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Crowley WF, Whitcomb RW, Gonadotropin-releasing hormone deficiency in men: diagnosis and treatment with exogenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990 163:1752-1758[Medline]
  6. Haisenleder DJ, Dalkin AC, Ortolano GA, Marshall JC, Shupnik MA, A pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone stimulus is required to increase transcription of the gonadotropin subunit genes: evidence for differential regulation of transcription by pulse frequency in vivo. Endocrinology 1991 128:509-517[Abstract]
  7. Haisenleder DJ, Katt JA, Ortolano GA, el-Gewely MR, Duncan JA, Dee C, Marshall JC, Influence of gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse amplitude, frequency, and treatment duration on the regulation of luteinizing hormone (LH) subunit messenger ribonucleic acids and LH secretion. Mol Endocrinol 1988 2:338-343[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Karsch FJ, Evans NP, Feedback actions of estradiol on GnRH secretion during the follicular phase of the estrous cycle. Acta Neurobiol Exp 1996 56:715-725[Medline]
  9. Tilbrook AJ, Clarke IJ, Negative feedback regulation of the secretion and actions of GnRH in male ruminants. J Reprod Fertil 1995 49:297-306
  10. Plant TM, Effects of orchidectomy and testosterone replacement treatment on pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in the adult rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Endocrinology 1982 110:1905-1913[Abstract]
  11. Herbison AE, Multimodal influence of estrogen upon gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Endocr Rev 1998 19:302-330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Jackson G, Kuehl D, Rhim TJ, Testosterone inhibits gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency in the male sheep. Biol Reprod 1991 45:188-194[Abstract]
  13. Levine JE, Duffy MT, Simultaneous measurement of luteinizing hormone (LH)-releasing hormone, LH, and follicle-stimulating hormone release in intact and short-term castrate rats. Endocrinology 1988 122:2211-2221[Abstract]
  14. Hileman SM, Lubbers LS, Petersen SL, Kuehl DE, Scott CJ, Jackson GL, Influence of testosterone on LHRH release, LHRH mRNA and proopiomelanocortin mRNA in male sheep. J Neuroendocrinol 1996 8:113-121[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Tilbrook AJ, de Kretser DM, Cummins JT, Clarke IJ, The negative feedback effects of testicular steroids are predominantly at the hypothalamus in the ram. Endocrinology 1991 129:3080-3092[Abstract]
  16. Damassa D, Kobashigawa D, Smith ER, Davidson JM, Negative feedback control of LH by testosterone: a quantitative study in male rats. Endocrinology 1976 99:736-742[Abstract]
  17. Mooradian A, Morley JE, Korenman SG, Biological actions of androgens. Endocr Rev 1987 8:1-28[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Selmanoff M, Brodkin LD, Weiner RI, Siiteri PK, Aromatization and 5alpha-reduction of androgens in discrete hypothalamic and limbic regions of the male and female rat. Endocrinology 1977 101:841-848[Abstract]
  19. Naftolin F, Ryan KJ, Davies IJ, Petro Z, Kuhn M, The formation and metabolism of estrogen in brain tissues. Adv Biosci 1975 15:105-121[Medline]
  20. Hrabovszky E, Shughrue PJ, Merchenthaler I, Hajszan T, Carpenter CD, Liposits Z, Petersen SL, Detection of estrogen receptor-beta messenger ribonucleic acid and 125I-estrogen binding sites in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons of the rat brain. Endocrinology 2000 141:3506-3509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hrabovszky E, Steinhauser A, Barabas K, Shughrue PJ, Petersen SL, Merchenthaler I, Liposits Z, Estrogen receptor-beta immunoreactivity in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons of the rat brain. Endocrinology 2001 142:3261-3264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lehman MN, Ebling FJ, Moenter SM, Karsch FJ, Distribution of estrogen receptor-immunoreactive cells in the sheep brain. Endocrinology 1993 133:876-886[Abstract]
  23. Herbison AE, Skinner DC, Robinson JE, King IS, Androgen receptor-immunoreactive cells in ram hypothalamus: distribution and co-localization patterns with gonadotropin-releasing hormone, somatostatin and tyrosine hydroxylase. Neuroendocrinology 1996 63:120-131[Medline]
  24. Herbison AE, Pape JR, New evidence for estrogen receptors in gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Front Neuroendocrinol 2001 22:292-308[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Zhou L, Blaustein JD, De Vries GJ, Distribution of androgen receptor immunoreactivity in vasopressin- and oxytocin-immunoreactive neurons in the male rat brain. Endocrinology 1994 134:2622-2627[Abstract]
  26. Scott CJ, Tilbrook AJ, Simmons DM, Rawson JA, Chu S, Fuller PJ, Ing NH, Clarke IJ, The distribution of cells containing estrogen receptor-alpha (ER alpha) and ER beta messenger ribonucleic acid in the preoptic area and hypothalamus of the sheep: comparison of males and females. Endocrinology 2000 141:2951-2962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Greco B, Edwards DA, Zumpe D, Clancy AN, Androgen receptor and mating-induced fos immunoreactivity are co-localized in limbic and midbrain neurons that project to the male rat medial preoptic area. Brain Res 1998 781:15-24[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Lee EJ, Moore CT, Hosny S, Centers A, Jennes L, Expression of estrogen receptor-alpha and c-Fos in adrenergic neurons of the female rat during the steroid-induced LH surge. Brain Res 2000 875:56-65[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Sheng Z, Kawano J, Yanai A, Fujinaga R, Tanaka M, Watanabe Y, Shinoda K, Expression of estrogen receptors (alpha, beta) and androgen receptor in serotonin neurons of the rat and mouse dorsal raphe nuclei: sex and species differences. Neurosci Res 2004 49:185-196[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Cooke BM, Breedlove SM, Jordan CL, Both estrogen receptors and androgen receptors contribute to testosterone-induced changes in morphology of the medial amygdala and sexual arousal in male rats. Horm Behav 2003 43:335-346
  31. Greco B, Edwards DA, Michael RP, Zumpe D, Clancy AN, Colocalization of androgen receptors and mating-induced FOS immunoreactivity in neurons that project to the central tegmental field of male rats. J Comp Neurol 1999 408:220-236[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Vanderhorst VG, Gustafsson JA, Ulfhake B, Estrogen receptor-alpha and -beta immunoreactive neurons in the brainstem and spinal cord of male and female mice: relationships to monoaminergic, cholinergic and spinal projection systems. J Comp Neurol 2005 488:152-179[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Noel SD, Keen KL, Filardo EJ, Terasawa E, Possible role of G-protein-coupled receptor GPR30 in estrogen action in primate LHRH neurons. Abstract viewer/itinerary planner, Society for Neuroscience; 2005: program no. 725.6
  34. Shakil T, Hoque AN, Husain M, Belsham DD, Differential regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion and gene expression by androgen: membrane versus nuclear receptor activation. Mol Endocrinol 2002 16:2592-2602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Scott C, Kuehl DE, Ferreira SA, Jackson GL, Hypothalamic sites of action for testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, estrogen in the regulation of luteinizing hormone secretion in male sheep. Endocrinology 1997 138:3686-3694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Roselli C, Resko JA, Regulation of hypothalamic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in male rhesus monkey. Brain Res 1990 509:343-346[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Carani C, Zin K, Simoni M, Faustini-Fustini M, Serpente S, Boyd J, Korach KS, Simpson ER, Effect of testosterone and estradiol in a man with aromatase deficiency. N Engl J Med 1997 337:91-95[Free Full Text]
  38. Smith EP, Boyd J, Frank GR, Takahashi H, Cohen RM, Specker B, Williams T, Luban DB, Korach KS, Estrogen insensitivity syndrome in an adult man caused by homozygous nonsense mutation of the estrogen receptor gene. N Engl J Med 1994 331:1056-1061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Fisher C, Graves KH, Parlow AF, Simpson ER, Characterization of mice deficient in aromatase (ArKO) because of targeted disruption of the cyp19 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998 95:6965-6970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Tilbrook AJ, de Kretser DM, Clarke IJ, Seasonal changes in the negative feedback regulation of the secretion of the gonadotrophins by testosterone and inhibin in rams. J Endocrinol 1999 160:155-167[Abstract]
  41. Urban R, Davis MR, Rogol AD, Johnson ML, Veldhuis JD, Acute androgen receptor blockade increases luteinizing hormone secretory activity in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988 67:1149-1155[Abstract]
  42. Hileman S, Lubbers LS, Kuehl DE, Schaeffer DJ, Rhodes L, Jackson GL, Effect of inhibiting 5 alpha reductase activity on the ability of testosterone to inhibit LH release in male sheep. Biol Reprod 1994 50:1244-1250[Abstract]
  43. Lindzey J, Wetsel WC, Couse JF, Stoker T, Cooper R, Korach KS, Effects of castration and chronic steroid treatments on hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone content and pituitary gonadotropins in male wild-type and estrogen receptor-alpha knockout mice. Endocrinology 1998 139:4092-4101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Wersinger SR, Haisenleder DJ, Lubahn DB, Rissman EF, Steroid feedback on gonadotropin release and pituitary gonadotropin subunit mRNA in mice lacking a functional estrogen receptor alpha. Endocrine 1999 11:137-143[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Finkelstein JS, O'Dea LS, Whitcomb RW, Crowley WF, Jr, Sex steroid control of gonadotropin secretion in the human male. II. Effects of estradiol administration in normal and gonadotropin-releasing hormone-deficient men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991 73:621-628[Abstract]
  46. Bagatell C, Dahl KD, Bremner WJ, The direct pituitary effect of testosterone to inhibit gonadotropin secretion in men is partially mediated by aromatization to estradiol. Andrology 1994 15:15-21
  47. Suter KJ, Song WJ, Sampson TL, Wuarin JP, Saunders JT, Dudek FE, Moenter SM, Genetic targeting of green fluorescent protein to gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons: characterization of whole-cell electrophysiological properties and morphology. Endocrinology 2000 141:412-419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Fallest PC, Trader GL, Darrow JM, Shupnik MA, Regulation of rat luteinizing hormone beta gene expression in transgenic mice by steroids and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist. Biol Reprod 1995 53:103-109[Abstract]
  49. Haavisto A, Pettersson K, Bergendahl M, Perheentupa A, Roser JF, Huhtaniemi I, A supersensitive immunofluorometric assay for rat luteinizing hormone. Endocrinology 1993 132:1687-1691[Abstract]
  50. Matteri R, Roser JF, Baldwin DM, Lipovetsky V, Papkoff H, Characterization of a monoclonal antibody which detects luteinizing hormone from diverse mammalian species. Domest Anim Endocrinol 1987 4:157-165[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Chu Z, Moenter SM, Endogenous activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors modulates GABAergic transmission to gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons and alters their firing rate: a possible local feedback circuit. J Neurosci 2005 25:5740-5749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Nunemaker C, DeFazio RA, Moenter SM, Estradiol-sensitive afferents modulate long-term episodic firing patterns of GnRH neurons. Endocrinology 2002 143:2284-2292[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Nunemaker CS, DeFazio RA, Moenter SM, A targeted extracellular approach for recording long-term firing patterns of excitable cells: a practical guide. Biol Proc Online 2003 5:53-62
  54. Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ, The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates New York: Academic Press 1997
  55. Veldhuis JD, Johnson ML, Cluster analysis: a simple versatile, and robust algorithm for endocrine pulse detection. Am J Physiol 1986 250:E486-E493
  56. Sullivan SD, Moenter SM, GABAergic integration of progesterone and androgen feedback to gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Biol Reprod 2005 72:33-41[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Dutton A, Dyball RE, Phasic firing enhances vasopressin release from the rat neurohypophysis. J Physiol 1979 290:433-440[Medline]
  58. Caraty A, Ram hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal-interactions. Effects of castration and cryptorchidism. Acta Endocrinol 1983 102:292-298
  59. Damassa DA, Rabii J, Sawyer CH, Responses of serum LH and FSH to the removal of steroid feedback inhibition. Effects of neonatal androgen sterilization and of anterior hypothalamic deafferentation. Neuroendocrinology 1983 37:122-130[Medline]
  60. Nunemaker CS, Straume M, DeFazio RA, Moenter SM, Gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons generate interacting rhythms in multiple time domains. Endocrinology 2003 144:823-831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Hales TG, Sanderson MJ, Charles AC, GABA has excitatory actions on GnRH-secreting immortalized hypothalamic (GT1–7) neurons. Neuroendocrinology 1994 59:297-308[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. Kuehl-Kovarik MC, Pouliot WA, Halterman GL, Handa RJ, Dudek FE, Partin KM, Episodic bursting activity and response to excitatory amino acids in acutely dissociated gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons genetically targeted with green fluorescent protein. J Neurosci 2002 22:2313-2322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Terasawa E, Schanhofer WK, Keen KL, Luchansky L, Intracellular Ca(2+) oscillations in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons derived from the embryonic olfactory placode of the rhesus monkey. J Neurosci 1999 19:5898-5909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. McManus C, Goodman RL, Llanza NV, Valent M, Dobbins AB, Connors JM, Hileman SM, Inhibition of LH secretion by localized administration of estrogen, but not dihydrotestosterone, is enhanced in the ventromedial hypothalamus during feed restriction in the young wether. Biol Reprod 2005 73:781-789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Nishihara M, Takahashi M, Effects of active immunization against estradiol-17 beta on luteinizing hormone and testosterone in male rats. Biol Reprod 1983 29:1092-1097[Abstract]
  66. Sharma T, Blache D, Blackberry MA, Martin GB, Role of peripheral and central aromatization in the control of gonadotropin secretion. Endocrinology 2000 11:293-302
  67. Pau KY, Gliessman PM, Hess DL, Ronnekleiv OK, Levine JE, Spies HG, Acute administration of estrogen suppresses LH secretion without altering GnRH release in ovariectomized rhesus macaques. Brain Res 1990 517:229-235[CrossRef][Medline]
  68. Caraty A, Locatelli A, Martin GB, Biphasic response in the secretion of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone in ovariectomized ewes injected with oestradiol. J Endocrinol 1989 123:375-382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Christian C, Mobley JL, Moenter SM, Diurnal and estradiol-dependent changes in gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuron firing activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005 102:15682-15687[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Pielecka J, Quaynor SD, Moenter SM, Androgens increase GnRH neurons firing activity in females and interfere with progesterone negative feedback. Endocrinology published online ahead of press 8 December 2005; 10.1210en.2005-1029
  71. Satoru K, Winters SJ, Regulation of luteinizing hormone secretion and subunit messenger ribonucleic acid expression by gonadal steroids in perifused pituitary cells from male monkeys and rats. Endocrinology 1999 140:3587-3599[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Nansel DD, Aiyer MS, Meinzer WH, Bogdanove EM, Rapid direct effects of castration and androgen treatment on luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone release in the phenobarbital-treated male rat: examination of the roles direct and indirect androgen feedback mechansims might play in the physiological control of luteinizing hormone release. Endocrinology 1979 104:524-531[Medline]
  73. Curtin D, Jenkins S, Farmer N, Anderson AC, Haisenleder DJ, Rissman E, Wilson EM, Shupnik MA, Androgen suppression of GnRH-stimulated rat LHbeta gene transcription occurs through Sp1 sites in the distal GnRH-responsive promoter region. Mol Endocrinol 2001 15:1906-1917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Rissman EF, Wersinger SR, Taylor JA, Lubahn DB, Estrogen receptor function as revealed by knockout studies: neuroendocrine and behavioral aspects. Horm Behav 1997 31:232-243[CrossRef][Medline]
  75. Kotsuji F, Winters SJ, Attardi B, Keeping HS, Oshima H, Troen P, Effects of gonadal steroids on gonadotropin secretion in males: studies with perifused rat pitutiary cells. Endocrinology 1988 123:2683-2689[Abstract]
  76. Handa RJ, Roselli CE, Horton LE, Resko JA, The quantitative distribution of cytosolic androgen receptors in microdissected areas of the male rat brain and the effects of estrogen treatment. Endocrinology 1987 121:233-240[Abstract]
  77. Roselli C, Synergistic induction of aromatase activity in the rat brain by estradiol and 5alpha-dihyrotestosterone. Neuroendocrinology 1991 53:79-84[Medline]
  78. Lund T, Munson DJ, Haldy ME, Handa RJ, Dihydrotestosterone may inhibit hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal activity by acting through estrogen receptor in the male mouse. Neurosci Lett 2004 365:43-47[CrossRef][Medline]
  79. Hrabovszky E, Barabás K, Kalló I, Merchenthaler I, Moenter SM, Liposits Z, Comparative studies of nuclear estrogen receptor-beta immunoreactivity in gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons of rats and mice. 5th International Congress of Neuroendocrinology, Bristol, UK; 2002: 336
  80. Marshall JC, Eagleson CA, Neuroendocrine aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am 1999 28:295-324[CrossRef][Medline]
  81. Moenter S, DeFazio RA, Endogenous GABA can excite GnRH neurons. Endocrinology 2005 146:5374-5379[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Han SK, Abraham IM, Herbison AE, Effect of GABA on GnRH neurons switches from depolarization to hyperpolarization at puberty in the female mouse. Endocrinology 2002 143:1459-1466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  83. DeFazio RA, Heger S, Ojeda SR, Moenter SM, Activation of A-type gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors excites gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Mol Endocrinol 2002 16:2872-2891[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  84. Leranth C, Petnehazy O, MacLusky NJ, Gonadal hormones affect spine density in the CA1 hippocampal subfield of male rats. Neuroscience 2003 23:1588-1592[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
C. A. Christian, C. Glidewell-Kenney, J. L. Jameson, and S. M. Moenter
Classical Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Signaling Mediates Negative and Positive Feedback on Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neuron Firing
Endocrinology, November 1, 2008; 149(11): 5328 - 5334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Wang, M. Garro, H. A. Dantzler, J. A. Taylor, D. D. Kline, and M. C. Kuehl-Kovarik
Age Affects Spontaneous Activity and Depolarizing Afterpotentials in Isolated Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons
Endocrinology, October 1, 2008; 149(10): 4938 - 4947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
Z. Chu and S. M. Moenter
Physiologic Regulation of a Tetrodotoxin-Sensitive Sodium Influx That Mediates a Slow Afterdepolarization Potential in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons: Possible Implications for the Central Regulation of Fertility.
J. Neurosci., November 15, 2006; 26(46): 11961 - 11973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
74/5/931    most recent
biolreprod.105.049619v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pielecka, J.
Right arrow Articles by Moenter, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pielecka, J.
Right arrow Articles by Moenter, S. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pielecka, J.
Right arrow Articles by Moenter, S. M.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS