Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print March 24, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.026542
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
71/2/432    most recent
biolreprod.103.026542v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Esaki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Esaki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Esaki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, H.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 71, 432–437 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.026542
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Embryo

Cryopreservation of Porcine Embryos Derived from In Vitro-Matured Oocytes1

Ritsuko Esaki3,5, Hideto Ueda5, Mayuko Kurome5, Kazumasa Hirakawa5, Ryo Tomii5, Hiroki Yoshioka4,5, Hitoshi Ushijima6, Masashige Kuwayama7, and Hiroshi Nagashima2,5

Laboratory of Developmental Engineering,5 Department of Life Science, School of Agriculture, Meiji University, Kawasaki 214-8571, Japan Chiba Prefectural Animal Experimental Station,6 Chiba, 289-1113, Japan Kato Ladies' Clinic,7 Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study describes a cryopreservation method for porcine in vitro-produced (IVP) embryos using as a model parthenogenetic embryos derived from in vitro-matured (IVM) oocytes. IVP embryos at the expanded blastocyst stage were cryopreserved by vitrification using the minimum volume cooling (MVC) method and exhibited an embryo survival rate of 41.2%. Survival was then significantly improved (83.3%, P < 0.05) by decreasing the amount of cytoplasmic lipid droplets (delipation) prior to vitrification. IVP embryos at the 4-cell stage also survived cryopreservation when vitrified after delipation (survival rate, 36.0%), whereas post-thaw survival of nondelipated embryos was quite low (9.7%). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that porcine IVP morulae can be cryopreserved by vitrification following delipation by a noninvasive method (survival rate, 82.5%). These results clearly confirm that porcine embryos derived from IVM oocytes can be effectively cryopreserved with high embryo survival using the MVC method in conjunction with delipation.

embryo, gamete biology, developmental biology, early development, ovum


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cryopreservation technology applied to mammalian embryos of livestock such as cattle, goats, sheep, and other model animals has led to many successful developments since the 1980s (see [1] for a review). This, however, is not the case regarding cryopreservation of porcine embryos, which has faced many challenges over the years (see [2] for a review).

It has only fairly recently become feasible to produce progeny from frozen porcine embryos [25], although the highly variable cryotolerance of pig embryos over the developmental stages has limited applications for embryos at certain developmental stages [2, 6]. Porcine embryos at the perihatching stage are known to be most resistant to freezing [6, 7], and their cryopreservation by the conventional freezing method has successfully led to offspring production [2, 8]. Conventional freezing, however, has been plagued by a low survival rate in that after thawing, even perihatching-stage embryos showed poor survival, at about 30% [2].

Vitrification has improved the survival rate of perihatching-stage porcine embryos subsequent to cryopreservation (see [9] for a review). Moreover, technological improvements have led to higher survival rates in porcine morulae and early blastocysts, which are notoriously sensitive to damage by conventional freezing [10]. This technique has been further improved to achieve more stable vitrification using the open pulled straw [11] and minimum volume cooling (MVC) [12] methods such that higher embryo viability is provided [13].

In an effort to improve survival after cryopreservation, alternative approaches have been directed at increasing cryotolerance of porcine embryos. Nagashima et al. [14, 15] showed that delipation, which removes cytoplasmic lipid droplets in embryos, remarkably improves embryo viability following cryopreservation. And since then, the transfer of delipated porcine morulae and blastocysts was demonstrated to provide a practically feasible birth rate after cryopreservation [16, 17].

These advancements in cryopreservation of porcine embryos have been successful only for in vivo-derived embryos, whereas in recent pig cloning research, an in vitro-matured (IVM) oocyte is usually employed [1822], as is also the case with transgenic pig production [23] and in vitro fertilization [24]. Because improvements in cryopreservation technology of in vitro-produced (IVP) embryos will further facilitate studies on pig cloning and the establishment of a gene bank of transgenic pigs, it is necessary to establish cryopreservation technology for embryos derived from IVM oocytes. Successful cryopreservation of IVP embryos, however, remains elusive.

These considerations led to the present study, which describes a cryopreservation method for IVP porcine embryos. As a model, we used embryos that were parthenogenetically developed from IVM oocytes. Postvitrification viability of embryos at the perihatching stage was first investigated due to their high resistance to cryopreservation, after which embryos were vitrified at the early cleavage stages with the future intent to transfer IVP embryos to the recipient's oviduct. We also report on the effect of delipation on cryotolerance of IVP porcine embryos, and on the successful vitrification of porcine IVP embryos, which were delipated by a newly developed noninvasive method.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chemicals

Unless otherwise indicated chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO).

In Vitro Maturation of Oocytes

Ovaries were collected at a local abattoir and transported to the laboratory in PBS containing 75 µg/ml potassium penicillin G, 50 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate, and 0.1% (w/v) polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were collected from antral follicles (3.0–6.0 mm in diameter) of ovaries by aspiration. COCs having at least three layers of compacted cumulus cells were selected and cultured in NCSU23 medium [25] supplemented with 0.6 mM cysteine, 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF), 10% (v/v) porcine follicular fluid, 75 µg/ml potassium penicillin G, 50 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate, and 10 IU/ml of eCG and hCG (Teikoku Zouki Co., Tokyo, Japan). They were cultured for 22 h with hormones and then 22 h without hormones in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air at 38.5°C.

Electric Activation of IVM Oocytes

IVM oocytes with expanded cumulus cells were treated with 1 mg/ml hyaluronidase dissolved in Tyrode lactose medium supplemented with 10 mM Hepes and 0.3% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) (Hepes-TL-PVP), then denuded of cumulus cells by gentle pipetting. Oocytes having extruded the first polar body were selected and washed twice in an activation solution consisting of 0.3 M mannitol (Nacalai Tesque Inc., Tokyo, Japan), 50 µM CaCl2, 100 µM MgCl2, and 0.01% PVA. Next, they were lined up between two wire electrodes (1.0 mm apart) of a fusion chamber overlaid with 0.2 ml of activation solution, and a single 150-V/mm DC pulse was applied for 100 µsec using an electrical pulsing machine (ET-1; Fujihira, Tokyo, Japan). Activated oocytes were finally treated with 5 µg/ml cytochalasin B (CB) for 3 h.

In Vitro Culture of Embryos

In vitro culture of IVP embryos except for those in experiment 3 was performed in 20-µl droplets of NCSU23 supplemented with 4 mg/ml BSA under paraffin oil in a plastic Petri dish in humidified air with 5% CO2 at 38.5°C. For culturing embryos that developed beyond the morula stage, 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS) was added to the medium.

For culturing the IVP embryos for the first 2 days in experiment 3, NCSU medium was modified to contain 0.17 mM sodium-pyruvate and 0.17 mM sodium-lactate instead of glucose. The gas atmosphere used in experiment 3 was 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2.

Removal of Cytoplasmic Lipid Droplets from Embryos (Delipation)

Removal of cytoplasmic lipid droplets was carried out by a method described previously [14, 15]. Briefly, to polarize lipid granules in the cytoplasm, embryos were centrifuged (12 000 x g, 23 min) at room temperature in Hepes-TL-PVP containing 7.5 µg/ml CB using a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube (Treff Lab, Schweiz, Switzerland). The resultant lipid layer was removed by micromanipulation using a beveled suction pipette (diameter, 28–32 µm) attached to micromanipulators (MO-108; Narishige, Tokyo, Japan) under an inverted microscope (TE300; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

Noninvasive delipation of embryos was also carried out. IVP morulae at 4 days after activation were treated with 4% trypsin (in PBS) for 3.5 min, so that the zona pellucidae were swollen due to slight digestion. Embryos were then washed twice by PBS + 10% FCS. Embryos with swollen zona were centrifuged in the presence of CB as described above to polarize the cytoplasmic lipid droplets in the perivitelline space. After centrifugation embryos were subjected to vitrification within 2 min.

Vitrification of Embryos

Cryopreservation of embryos was carried out by vitrification using the MVC method [12]. All solutions used during vitrification and thawing were prepared with TCM-199 containing 20 mM Hepes, 4.2 mM NaHCO3, 75 µg/ml potassium penicillin G, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate as the basal medium. Embryos were equilibrated with equilibration solution containing 7.5% (v/v) ethylene glycol (Nacalai Tesque), 7.5% (v/ v) dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO; Wako Pure Chemical Industries Co., Osaka, Japan), and 20% (v/v) calf serum (JRH Biosciences, Inc., Lenexa, KS) for 4 min followed by exposure to vitrification solution containing 15% ethylene glycol, 15% DMSO, 0.5 M sucrose (Nacalai Tesque), and 20% calf serum. Embryos were then loaded onto an MVC plate (Cryotop; Kitazato Supply, Tokyo, Japan) and immediately plunged into liquid nitrogen. The process from exposure of embryos to plunging was completed within 1 min. Embryos were thawed by immersing the MVC plate directly into thawing solution containing 1 M sucrose and 20% calf serum at 37°C for 1 min. Recovered embryos were transferred to a diluent solution containing 0.5 M sucrose and 20% calf serum and kept for 3 min, after which they were kept for 10 min in a washing solution containing 20% calf serum in order to remove cryoprotectant. All solutions except for the thawing solution, were used at room temperature.

Fixation and Staining of Embryos

Cryopreserved and control IVP embryos were fixed with aceto-alcohol (1:3) 8 days after activation. Embryos were stained with 1% aceto-orcein to determine cell number.

Experiment 1

This experiment was performed to examine survival of IVP porcine blastocysts after cryopreservation. As the cryotolerance of in vivo-derived porcine blastocysts is known to reach maximum at the perihatching stage, including the expanded blastocyst stage [6, 7], expanded blastocysts 6 days after parthenogenetic activation were subjected to vitrification.

We also tested whether survival of IVP porcine blastocysts after vitrification can be improved by delipation, which is known to be effective in rendering in vivo-derived porcine embryos cryotolerant. IVP embryos at the morula stage were delipated at 4 days after activation and further cultured for 2 days. Delipation at the morula stage was determined by our preliminary data that delipation of embryos at the expanded blastocyst stage turned out to be technically difficult. Embryos developing to expanded blastocysts were vitrified. Vitrified embryos and control IVP embryos were cultured up to Day 8 to examine their survival and cell number.

Experiment 2

This experiment was conducted to examine the possibility of cryopreserving IVP porcine embryos at an early cleavage stage, assuming that IVP porcine embryos such as transgenic or cloned embryos are transferred to recipients at an early developmental stage.

At 2 days after activation, IVP embryos at the 4-cell stage were delipated, further cultured for 15 h, and vitrified. As a control, nondelipated embryos at the 4-cell stage were also vitrified. Vitrified embryos and nonvitrified IVP embryos were cultured up to Day 8 to examine their development to the blastocyst stage.

Experiment 3

The aim of this experiment was to investigate the possibility of cryopreserving IVP embryos without using micromanipulation for delipation.

Survival of embryos vitrified after delipation by the noninvasive method (tryp/centr–morula; Fig. 1a) was compared with other embryos, including delipated morulae, morulae centrifuged without trypsin treatment (centr–morula; Fig. 1b), and intact control morulae.



View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Polarization of the cytoplasmic lipid droplets after centrifugation of a parthenogenetic porcine IVP morula. A morula-stage embryo centrifuged with (a) and without (b) trypsin treatment. Note that complete separation of lipid droplets from blastomeres could be achieved (a). Scale bar = 50 µm

Vitrified embryos and nonvitrified IVP embryos were cultured up to Day 8 to examine their development to the blastocyst stage.

Statistical Analysis

Survival rates of embryos were compared using {chi}2-test. The Student t-test was used to compare mean cell numbers of embryos.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Experiment 1

Table 1 summarizes the results of cryopreserving IVP embryos vitrified at the expanded blastocyst stage, where about 40% of the IVP blastocysts survived vitrification (Fig. 2a), although their average cell number was lower compared to that of the nonvitrified blastocysts (38.4 ± 5.1 vs. 61.9 ± 5.8, P < 0.05). Note that survival rate and embryo quality of IVP embryos was significantly improved (41.2% vs. 83.3%; 38.4 ± 5.1 vs. 51.8 ± 4.2, P < 0.05) when cryopreserved after delipation. In fact, the survival rate of vitrified delipated blastocysts was nearly the same as that of nonvitrified controls (intact blastocysts, 88.0%; delipated nonvitrified blastocysts, 92.9%). Cell number of the delipated blastocysts after vitrification was also not significantly different compared to that of nonvitrified controls.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Survival of parthenogenetic porcine IVP blastocysts (Day 6) after vitrification



View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Survival of parthenogenetic porcine IVP blastocysts after vitrification. Day 8 blastocysts developed from nondelipated (a) and delipated (b) embryos after vitrification. Photographs were taken 48 h after thawing. Scale bar = 150 µm

As shown in Figure 2b, many of the delipated blastocysts tended to herniate from the zona pellcidae in culture after thawing, indicating that decline of embryo quality was minimized when IVP blastocysts were cryopreserved after delipation.

Experiment 2

Table 2 summarizes the results of cryopreserving IVP embryos at the 4-cell stage. Most embryos vitrified without delipation degenerated within 24 h after thawing (Fig. 3a), having a very low developmental rate to blastocysts (6/62, 9.7%). By contrast, delipation of embryos prior to vitrification significantly improved post-thaw development (32/ 89, 36.0%, P < 0.05). Most embryos vitrified after delipation herniated from the zona pellucidae as shown in Figure 3b in culture after thawing.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Survival of parthenogenetic porcine IVP embryos after vitrifi cation at the 4-cell stage



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Survival of parthenogenetic porcine IVP embryos vitrified at the 4-cell stage. Most of the nondelipated embryos (a) degenerated by 24 h after vitrification, whereas embryos vitrified after delipation (b) developed to blastocysts 120 h after thawing. Scale bar = 150 µm

Experiment 3

As shown in Table 3, survival of IVP morulae vitrified after trypsin treatment and centrifugation (tryp/centr; 52/ 63, 82.5%; Fig. 4, b and c) was equal to that of the delipated morulae (46/56, 82.1%; Fig. 4e). These survival rates were as high as those of the nonvitrified control embryos (Fig. 4a).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Survival of parthenogenetic porcine IVP morulae vitrified after delipation by a noninvasive method



View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Development of parthenogenetic porcine IVP morulae vitrified after delipation by various methods. All the photographs except for (b) were taken 48 h after thawing (Day 6). a) Intact control nonvitrified embryos that developed to expanded blastocysts. b) Day 4 morulae centrifuged after trypsin treatment. c) Embryos vitrified after trypsin treatment and centrifugation. d) Embryos vitrified after centrifugation without trypsin treatment. e) Delipated morulae that developed to blastocysts after vitrification. f) Control vitrified morulae. Scale bar = 150 µm

Centrifugation without trypsin treatment was also shown to render the IVP morulae cryotolerant (survival, 24/44, 54.5%; Fig. 4d), although their survival rate was significantly lower than that of the tryp/centr and delipated groups (P < 0.05). In contrast, only a few (3/35, 8.6%) of the intact morulae survived vitrification (Fig. 4f).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cryopreservation of IVP bovine embryos derived from IVM oocytes has been successful at various developmental stages [26]. In general, however, because IVP embryos are more sensitive to hypothermic conditions than in vivo-produced embryos, they have lower viability following cryopreservation [2729]. Prolonged in vitro culture of oocytes and embryos results in disturbed membrane fluidity and permeability due to oxidation of constituting lipids [30]. Such physiological changes in the embryo are considered to account for low viability after thawing.

The porcine embryo is intrinsically quite sensitive to hypothermic exposure such that cryopreservation of IVP embryos has been thus far unobtainable. The key to their successful cryopreservation as shown here is the use of the MVC method (i.e., vitrification of embryos using a trace amount of vitrification solution allows for a rapid drop in temperature in the vitrification solution and stable vitrification in the presence of a low concentration of cryoprotective agent [13, 31, 32]). In our preliminary study, we confirmed that porcine IVP blastocysts could survive cryopreservation better with the MVC method than the conventional vitrification methods using high concentrations of ethylene glycol, DMSO, or propylene glycol (unpublished data). Furthermore, the MVC method is reported by other workers to provide higher survival rates of embryos compared to conventional vitrification in cattle [31], humans [12], pigs [33], and rabbits [34].

In addition, we used embryos at the expanded blastocyst stage, which also contributed to success (i.e., embryos at the perihatching stage including the expanded blastocyst stage are most cryotolerant [6, 7]). In a preliminary study, we confirmed that IVP embryos at earlier stages had lower viability following cryopreservation (unpublished data). On the other hand, because IVP embryos at the expanded blastocyst stage require longer culture, its effect on cryotolerance becomes another concern. It has been reported that some components in media, especially fetal calf serum, remarkably disturb cryotolerance of bovine IVP embryos [35, 36], thus, based on this, it is important to develop culture conditions suitable for cryopreservation of porcine IVP embryos.

Our results show that use of the MVC method in conjunction with delipation (removal of cytoplasmic lipid droplets) provides for effective cryopreservation of porcine IVP embryos. It was found that delipation of expanded blastocyst-stage embryos significantly improved the viability after cryopreservation (P < 0.05). Although the MVC method alone did not produce viable 4-cell and morula-stage embryos after cryopreservation, delipation increased the survival rate to 36.0% and 82.1%, respectively. These data suggest that delipation is effective not only for improving post-thaw survival of embryos with some cryotolerance, but for cryopreservation of highly cryosensitive embryos as well. In general, the presence of lipid droplets in the cytoplasm is considered an important aspect for embryonic development in terms of energy metabolism [37], yet delipation of porcine IVP embryos does not appear to pose a problem because delipated embryos have produced progeny [15].

We previously demonstrated that cryopreservation of delipated morulae is feasible using in vivo-derived embryos [16, 38]. Results of the present study further demonstrated that cryopreservation of delipated IVP morulae is also successful. In particular, development of a cryopreservation protocol for IVP morulae in conjunction with the noninvasive delipation method should have conspicuous practical value, because use of micromanipulation for delipation can be avoided.

Although our results demonstrated that conjunction of the MVC method with delipation dramatically increases postvitrification survival of IVP embryos, this protocol requires micromanipulation of embryos. In addition, our data indicated that embryos delipated by micromanipulation tended to have fewer cell numbers at the blastocyst stage, and this could be a drawback of the protocol, including delipation by the invasive method. In contrast, the embryos that had been vitrified after delipation by the noninvasive method had equal cell numbers as the intact control embryos.

By centrifuging IVP morulae with swollen zona, cytoplasmic lipid droplets could be well separated from the blastomeres (Fig. 1a). Therefore, these embryos were believed to be rendered as cryotolerant as the embryos delipated using micromanipulation. This was a notable difference from centrifuging embryos with intact zona pellucida (Fig. 1b), in which separation of the lipid droplets from the blastomeres tended to be less complete, hence embryos were not rendered highly cryotolerant [38].

When an embryo with an intact zona was centrifuged in the presence of CB, the mass of the cytoplasmic lipid droplets that were polarized in the perivitelline space tended to remain connected with blastomeres with string-like structures [38]. This bridge-like structure may cause redistribution of the lipid droplets into some blastomeres during the process of vitrification and thawing [38]. In contrast, when an embryo with swollen zona was centrifuged, its larger perivitelline space might allow complete cutoff of the bridges, so that separation of lipid droplets and blastomeres could be completed.

Cloned embryos generally have very low developmental potency, and hundreds of cloned embryos are required to obtain a single offspring [18, 22]. In addition, IVM oocytes are typically used to produce cloned embryos [1822]. Taken together, this indicates that if cryopreservation technology for IVM-derived cloned embryos is established, efficient production of cloned pigs might be possible by storing embryos necessary for embryo transfer. Cloned embryos are in general transferred at the early cleavage stages [20, 22, 39], with cryopreservation of IVP embryos at the 4-cell stage being demonstrated here such that application to embryo cloning appears feasible. On the other hand, effective pig cloning has been achieved by transfer of cloned embryos developed to the blastocyst stage in a temporal recipient [40]. This indicates, together with the data of our present study, an alternative path for cryopreservation of cloned pig embryos at the later developmental stages.

In conclusion, we have confirmed that porcine IVP embryos derived from IVM oocytes can be effectively cryopreserved using the MVC method in conjunction with delipation. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the successful cryopreservation of IVP embryos in the pig. It is expected that our study will open the doors for cryopreservation of highly manipulated IVP embryos such as cloned embryos.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 This work was supported by grant from the Japan Livestock Technology Association, PROBRAIN and the National Institute of Agrobiological Science. Back

2 Correspondence: Hiroshi Nagashima, Laboratory of Developmental Engineering, Department of Life Science, School of Agriculture, Meiji University, 1-1-1 Higashimita, Tama, Kawasaki 214-8571, Japan. FAX: 81 44 934 7824; hnagas{at}isc.meiji.ac.jp Back

3 Current address: Laboratory of Anatomy and Embryology, Institute of Basic Medical Science, Tsukuba University, 1-1-1, Tennoudai, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan Back

4 Current address: National Institute of Genetics, 1111 Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka, 411-8540, Japan Back

Received: 13 December 2003.

First decision: 26 December 2003.

Accepted: 16 March 2004.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Niemann H. Cryopreservation of ova and embryos from livestock: current status and research needs. Theriogenology 1991 35:109-123[CrossRef]
  2. Nagashima H, Kashiwazaki N, Ashman RJ, Grupen CG, Seamark RF, Nottle MB. Recent advances in cryopreservation of porcine embryos. Theriogenology 1994 41:113-118[CrossRef]
  3. Nagashima H, Kashiwazaki N, Ashman RJ, Nottle MB. Improved survival of porcine hatched blastocysts cryopreserved with glycerol and sucrose. J Reprod Dev 1995 41:165-170[CrossRef]
  4. Mödl J, Reichenbach HD, Wolf E, Brem G. Development of frozen-thawed porcine blastocysts in vitro and in vivo. Vet Rec 1996 139: : 208-210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kameyama K, Kudoh O, Takedomi T, Fukawa K. Transfer of cryopreserved pig embryos. Theriogenology 1997 47:366 (abstract) [CrossRef]
  6. Nagashima H, Yamakawa H, Niemann H. Freezability of porcine blastocysts at different peri-hatching stages. Theriogenology 1992 37: : 839-850
  7. Nagashima H, Kato Y, Yamakawa H, Matsumoto T, Ogawa S. Changes in freezing tolerance of pig blastocysts in peri-hatching stage. Jpn J Anim Reprod 1989 35:130-134
  8. Kashiwazaki N, Ohtani S, Nagashima H, Yamakawa H, Cheng WTK, Lin A-T, Ma RC-S, Ogawa S. Production of normal piglets from hatched blastocysts frozen at –196°C. Theriogenology 1991 35: : 221 (abstract) [CrossRef]
  9. Dobrinsky JR. Cryopreservation of pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1997 52:suppl301-312[CrossRef]
  10. Kuwayama M, Holm P, Jacobsen H, Greve T, Callesen H. Successful cryopreservation of porcine embryos by vitrification. Vet Rec 1997 4 365
  11. Vajta G, Booth PJ, Holm P, Greve T, Callesen H. Successful vitrification of early stage bovine in vitro produced embryos with the open pulled straw (OPS) method. Cryo Letters 1997 18:191-195
  12. Kuwayama M, Kato O. All-round vitrification method for human oocytes and embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000 17:477
  13. Vajta G. Vitrification of the oocytes and embryos of domestic animals. Anim Reprod Sci 2000 60:357-364
  14. Nagashima H, Kashiwazaki N, Ashman RJ, Grupen CG, Seamark RF, Nottle MB. Removal of cytoplasmic lipid enhances the tolerance of porcine embryos to chilling. Biol Reprod 1994 51:618-622[Abstract]
  15. Nagashima H, Kashiwazaki N, Ashman R, Grupen CG, Nottle MB. Cryopreservation of porcine embryos. Nature 1995 374:416[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Dobrinsky JR, Nagashima H, Pursel VG, Schreier LL, Johnson LA. Cryopreservation of morula and early blastocyst stage swine embryos: birth of litters after embryo transfer. Theriogenology 2001 55:303 (abstract)
  17. Dobrinsky JR. Advancements in cryopreservation of domestic animal embryos. Theriogenology 2002 57:288-302
  18. Betthauser J, Forsberg E, Augenstein M, Childs L, Eilertsen K, Enos J, Forsythe T, Golueke P, Jurgella G, Koppang R, Lesmeister T, Mallon K, Mell G, Misica P, Pace M, Pfister-Genskow M, Strelchenko N, Voelker G, Watt S, Thompson S, Bishop M. Production of cloned pigs from in vitro systems. Nat Biotechnol 2000 18:1055-1059[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Park K-W, Cheong HT, Park K-W, Lai L, Im G-S, Kühholzer B, Bonk A, Samuel M, Rieke A, Day BN, Murphy CN, Carter DB, Prather RS. Production of nuclear transfer-derived swine that express the enhanced green fluorescent protein. Anim Biotechnol 2001 12:173-181[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Park K-W, Lai L, Cheong HT, Cabot R, Sun Q-Y, Wu G, Rucker EB, Durtschi D, Bonk A, Samuel M, Rieke A, Day BN, Murphy CN, Carter DB, Prather RS. Mosaic gene expression in nuclear transfer-derived embryos and the production of cloned transgenic pigs from ear-derived fibroblasts. Biol Reprod 2002 66:1001-1005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Walker SC, Shin T, Zaunbrecher MZ, Romano JE, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Piedrahita JA. A highly efficient method for porcine cloning by nuclear transfer using in vitro-matured oocytes. Cloning Stem Cells 2002 4:105-112[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Lai L, Kolber-Simonds D, Park K-W, Cheong H-T, Greenstein JL, Im G-S, Samuel M, Bonk A, Rieke A, Day BN, Murphy CN, Carter DB, Hawley RJ, Prather RS. Production of {alpha}-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning. Science 2002 295:1089-1092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Shim SW, Kim YH, Jun SH, Lim JM, Chung HM, Ko JJ, Lee HT, Chung KS, Shim H. Transgenesis of porcine embryos using intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Theriogenology 2000 53:521
  24. Abeydeera L. In vitro fertilization and embryo development in pigs. Reprod Suppl 2001 58:159-173[Medline]
  25. Petters RM, Wells KD. Culture of pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 48:suppl61-73
  26. Fukuda Y, Ichikawa M, Naito K, Toyoda Y. Birth of normal calves resulting from bovine oocytes matured, fertilized and cultured with cumulus cells in vitro up to the blastocyst stage. Biol Reprod 1990 42 114-119
  27. Leibo SP, Loskutoff NM. Cryopreservation of in vitro-derived bovine embryos. Theriogenology 1993 39:81-94[CrossRef]
  28. Pollard JW, Leibo SP. Chilling sensitivity of mammalian embryos. Theriogenology 1994 41:101-106
  29. Hasler JF, Henderson WB, Hurtgen PJ, Jin ZQ, McCauley AD. Production, freezing and transfer of bovine IVF embryos and subsequent calving results. Theriogenology 1995 43:141-152[CrossRef]
  30. Johnson MH, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Radical solutions and cultural problems: could free oxygen radicals be responsible for the impaired development of preimplantation mammalian embryos in vitro?. Bioessays 1994 16:31-38[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Hamawaki A, Kuwayama M, Hamano S. Minimum volume cooling method for bovine blastocyst vitrification. Theriogenology 1999 51: : 165[CrossRef]
  32. Arav A, Yavin S, Zeron Y, Natan D, Dekel I, Gacitua H. New trend in gamete's cryopreservation. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2002 187:77-81[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Ushijima H, Esaki R, Yoshioka H, Kuwayama M, Nakane T, Nagashima H. Improved survival of cryopreserved porcine morulae. Theriogenology 2003 59:316 (abstract)
  34. Hochi S, Terao T, Kamei M, Hirao M, Hirabayashi M. Vitrification of pronuclear-stage rabbit zygotes by different ultra-rapid cooling procedure. Theriogenology 2003 59:303
  35. Abe H, Yamashita S, Itoh T, Satoh T, Hoshi H. Ultrastructure of bovine embryos developed from in vitro-matured and -fertilized oocytes: comparative morphological evaluation of embryos cultured either in serum-free medium or in serum-supplemented medium. Mol Reprod Dev 1999 53:325-335[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Abe H, Yamashita S, Satoh T, Hoshi H. Accumulation of cytoplasmic lipid droplets in bovine embryos and cryotolerance of embryos developed in different culture systems using serum-free or serum-containing media. Mol Reprod Dev 2002 61:57-66[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Leese HJ. Metabolism of the preimplantation mammalian embryos. Oxf Rev Reprod Biol 1991 13:35-72[Medline]
  38. Nagashima H, Cameron RD, Kuwayama M, Young M, Beebe L, Blackshaw AW, Nottle MB. Survival of porcine delipated oocytes and embryos after cryopreservation by freezing or vitrification. J Reprod Dev 1999 45:167-176[CrossRef]
  39. Polejaeva IA, Chen S-H, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares D, Colman A, Campbell KH. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 2000 407:86-90[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Iwamoto M, Kikuchi K, Akita T, Takeda K, Hanada H, Hashimoto M, Suzuki S, Fuchimoto D, Nagai T, Onishi A. Live cloned pigs generated from nuclear transferred embryos enucleated with sodium alginate. Theriogenology 2003 59:261[CrossRef]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. Somfai, M. Ozawa, J. Noguchi, H. Kaneko, M. Nakai, N. Maedomari, J. Ito, N. Kashiwazaki, T. Nagai, and K. Kikuchi
Live Piglets Derived from In Vitro-Produced Zygotes Vitrified at the Pronuclear Stage
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 42 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
Y Du, C S Pribenszky, M Molnar, X Zhang, H Yang, M Kuwayama, A M Pedersen, K Villemoes, L Bolund, and G Vajta
High hydrostatic pressure: a new way to improve in vitro developmental competence of porcine matured oocytes after vitrification
Reproduction, January 1, 2008; 135(1): 13 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Nagashima, K. Hiruma, H. Saito, R. Tomii, S. Ueno, N. Nakayama, H. Matsunari, and M. Kurome
Production of Live Piglets Following Cryopreservation of Embryos Derived from In Vitro-Matured Oocytes
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2007; 76(5): 900 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
71/2/432    most recent
biolreprod.103.026542v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Esaki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Esaki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Esaki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS