|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ovary |
AgResearch, Wallaceville Animal Research Centre, Upper Hutt, New Zealand
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ovary, pregnancy, corpus luteum, follicle, growth factors
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition to their essential role in follicular growth, both of these oocyte-derived growth factors influence ovulation rate in sheep ([2, 5, 79] and J. Hanrahan and S. Galloway, personal communication). Indeed, we have recently shown an increase in ovulation rate in some ewes when immunized against BMP15 or GDF9 using a dextran-based adjuvant [2]. However, based on the observed abnormalities in long-term or passively immunized ewes, it was unclear whether neutralization of a portion of BMP15 or GDF9 would affect subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Furthermore, alterations in pregnancy outcomes potentially could be attributed to a change in oocyte function or insufficient luteal function. Therefore, the objectives of this experiment were to determine the effect of short-term immunization against BMP15 and GDF9 on ovulation rate, fertilization of released oocytes, ability of fertilized oocytes to undergo normal fetal development, and the ability of immunized ewes to carry a pregnancy to term.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunization of Ewes Against GDF9 and BMP15
The peptides KKPLVPASVNLSEYFC (GDF9) and SEVPGPSREHDGPESC (BMP15) were synthesized and conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) through the C-terminal cysteine residue by Macromolecular Resources (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO). These peptides were chosen based on the dissimilarity of the peptide sequence with other members of the TGFß superfamily as assessed by a basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) search for short, nearly exact, matches [10] and previous results indicating that immunization against these peptides influenced ovulation rate [2, 5]. Sexually mature Romney ewes (approximately 50 kg, 46 yr old) were given a primary immunization with 0.4 mg KLH (N = 50, KLH), KLH-GDF9 (n = 30, GDF9) or KLH-BMP15 (n = 30, BMP15) in 5% (w/v) DEAE-dextran adjuvant followed by a 0.2 mg booster injection 4 wk later. The estrous cycles of the immunized ewes were synchronized at the time of the booster by giving an intravaginal controlled internal drug release device (CIDR; Pharmacia & Upjohn Limited Company, Auckland, New Zealand) containing progesterone for 13 days, with Estrumate (125 µg; Schering-Plough Animal Health Limited, Upper Hutt, New Zealand) given on Day 12 to induce luteolysis of any remaining CL. To maintain progesterone levels, the initial CIDR was replaced with a new CIDR on Day 10. At the time the replacement CIDR was removed, intact sexually mature Poll Dorset rams (n = 2), fitted with mating harnesses and crayons for determination of mating, were introduced to the immunized ewes. In addition, the estrous cycles of nonimmunized sexually mature Romney ewes were synchronized at the same time using identical procedures. The number of CL was determined by laparoscopy in all immunized ewes 3 days after mating. Embryos from approximately one-half of the ewes in each treatment group (KLH, n = 26; GDF9, n = 15; BMP15, n = 16) were surgically transferred to synchronized recipients (n = 43) on Days 46 of the estrous cycle as previously described [11]. All ewes having four or more CL, most ewes with three CL, as well as a random selection of ewes with one or two CL were selected to undergo the embryo transfer procedure. Recipients received one to three embryos each. The number of CL in the ewes from which embryos were recovered was also determined during the subsequent estrous cycle that was induced by an injection of Estrumate given on approximately Day 10 of the estrous cycle. The ewes not subjected to embryo transfer were allowed to carry their pregnancies to term.
Determination of Antibody Titers and Cross-Reactivity
Sera were collected from all immunized ewes prior to immunization and 2 wk after the booster immunization for determination of reactivity to GDF9 and BMP15. Antibody titers and cross-reactivity were determined by ELISA as described [5] with the following modifications: Sera samples were diluted to 1:10 000 from the BMP15 and KLH immunized animals to measure antibody titers for BMP15, whereas sera samples were diluted to 1:1000 from the GDF9 and KLH immunized animals for measurement of antibody titers for GDF9. In addition, the amount of Escherichia coli-expressed mature region of ovine GDF9 coated onto each well was increased to 200 ng and the incubation time for the interaction of sera and antigen was reduced to 1 h.
Determination of Concentrations of Progesterone in Plasma
Plasma was collected from all immunized ewes at Days 1, 3 (administration of PGF2
analogue), 4 (removal of CIDR), 5 (estrus), 7, and 9. Blood samples from those ewes that did not undergo the embryo flushing procedure were also collected at Days 14 and 19, and approximately every 10 days thereafter until Day 105 of pregnancy. Blood samples were also collected from recipient ewes beginning on the day they received an embryo and then with the same schedule as the immunized ewes carrying a pregnancy to term. The concentrations of progesterone in plasma were determined by RIA as previously described [12]. The sensitivity of the assay was 0.1 ng/ml, and the average interassay and intra-assay coefficients of variation were less then 10%.
Statistical Analysis
Antibody response was determined by comparing the optical density (OD) reading before immunization to those 2 wk following the booster immunization by paired t-test. One ewe in the BMP15 immunized group was excluded as she was shown to have nonspecific binding to BSA in her preimmune serum sample. Because no specific displacement was observed with the potentially cross-reacting protein for any animal, maximum cross-reactivity was calculated by expressing the concentration of specific protein required to displace 50% of maximum binding as a percentage of the maximum amount of cross-reacting protein tested in the assay. Animals in which the maximum binding was not determined were excluded from analyses.
Ovulation rate was calculated as the number of CL at a single observation (i.e., in ewes carrying pregnancy to term) or averaged for two observations (i.e., in ewes whose embryos were transferred to recipients). Four ewes in the BMP15 immunized group did not show estrus for approximately 30 days. For these animals, the ovulation rates were calculated by counting the number of CL after the first ovulation (two ewes) or following the first two ovulations (two ewes). Differences in ovulation rate were determined using chi-square analysis following grouping of the animals into three classes; namely, those with mean ovulation rates of 1 to <2, 2 to <3, or
3.
Differences in fertilization rates were determined using chi-square analysis by considering whether or not an embryo was recovered for every CL present on the ovary. In all groups, the data from ovaries in which flushing of the oviduct was noted as incomplete were excluded. Differences in embryo survival were determined using chi-square analysis after considering whether a lamb was born following transfer of an embryo. Three embryos from the BMP15 group were not transferred. Two of the embryos were from one of the ewes that was anestrous for approximately 30 days and were more advanced than anticipated at recovery and thus were not recovered whole, the third embryo was lost during the transfer procedure.
Differences in lambing percentages were determined by comparing the percentage of ewes carrying a pregnancy to term using chi-square analysis. One ewe in the KLH immunized group became ill and was killed shortly after breeding and was thus excluded from further analysis. Differences in the proportion of released oocytes (as assessed by number of CL) that resulted in the birth of a lamb in the immunized ewes were also determined by chi-square analysis. Effects of immunization on concentrations of progesterone in plasma were assessed using an ante-dependence analysis of order 1 in Genstat following natural log transformation of the data. Where progesterone values were at or below the sensitivity of the assay, a value of 0.1 ng/ml (i.e., the sensitivity of the assay) was assigned for the above analysis.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ewes immunized with KLH did not have measurable antibodies to either GDF9 or BMP15 (Table 1). Although a small amount of binding was observed to GDF9, this was deemed nonspecific, because binding levels did not increase following immunization. No binding was observed to BMP15 in sera collected from ewes prior to immunization or following immunization with KLH. Ewes immunized against GDF9 had measurable antibodies against GDF9 (P < 0.001) and those immunized against BMP15 had measurable antibodies against BMP15 (P < 0.001). Maximum cross-reactivity of antisera collected from BMP15 immunized ewes (n = 28) to GDF9 averaged 1.2% (range 0.1%3.2%) and, where they were measurable (n = 12 ewes), maximum cross-reactivity of ewes immunized against GDF9 to BMP15 averaged 1.8% (range 0.8%3.0%).
|
Effect of Immunization on Ovulation Rate, Fertilization of Oocytes, Embryo Survival, and Lambing Percentages
Immunization against either GDF9 or BMP15 increased ovulation rate when compared to KLH immunized control ewes (P < 0.001; Fig. 1). The mean ovulation rates for the KLH, GDF9, and BMP15 immunized ewes were 1.8, 2.2, and 2.6, respectively. Neither the ability of ovulated oocytes to be fertilized nor embryo survival was affected by immunization against either GDF9 or BMP15 (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the ability of a ewe to carry her pregnancy to term was not affected by immunization against either GDF9 or BMP15 (Fig. 3).
|
|
|
Effects of Immunization on Secretion of Progesterone During Pregnancy
Immunization against BMP15 or GDF9 did not affect the pattern of secretion of progesterone during the first estrous cycle (Fig. 4). In addition, the concentrations of progesterone in pregnant immunized or recipient ewes were not different among the groups (Figs. 4 and 5).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been hypothesized that the mutation in Inverdale sheep alters follicular development by changing the processing of GDF9 and thus decreasing GDF9 secretion and that this reduction in GDF9 levels may be involved in the infertility observed in homozygous Inverdale ewes [13]. This hypothesis is based on the reduced expression of the mature form of GDF9 and BMP15 in cells coexpressing the mutant Inverdale form of BMP15 and normal GDF9. The present results are inconsistent with the effects of the Inverdale mutation being mediated through reduced secretion of GDF9, because it is unlikely that an antibody would be able to influence intracellular processing of BMP15 or GDF9. Based on the current study, we hypothesize that in the regulation of ovulation rate in sheep, either BMP15 and GDF9 homodimers have essential but similar roles, or that BMP15/GDF9 heterodimers have essential roles, or both.
In sheep, long-term immunization against either the BMP15 or GDF9 peptides used in these trials with an adjuvant capable of eliciting a strong immune response (i.e., Freunds adjuvant) resulted in abnormal follicular development [5]. These abnormalities were particularly evident in the oocyte itself as well as the cumulous granulosa cells surrounding the oocyte. Neutralization of GDF9 also appeared to affect the function of the CL. Oocyte function is altered in mice lacking functional GDF9 [6], and fertilization is reduced in BMP15 knockout mice [4]. This suggests that both GDF9 and BMP15 may play essential roles in not only regulating ovulation rate but also oocyte health and establishment of pregnancy. In the current study, neutralization of sufficient amounts of GDF9 or BMP15 to increase ovulation rate did not appear to dramatically affect oocyte health or the ability of the embryo to develop. Immunized ewes were also able to carry a pregnancy to term. Similar results are observed in ewes heterozygous for the Inverdale gene, in which ovulation rate increases lead to a predicable increase in litter size [14]. It could be argued that neutralization of a large portion of GDF9 or BMP15, which would be predicted to lead to a superovulation type response, might result in reduced quality of oocytes released or decreased ability of the immunized ewe to carry a pregnancy to term. Some of the ewes in the present study immunized with BMP15 peptide did undergo a short period of anovulation before returning to estrous with increased ovulation rates. These oocytes were apparently healthy, as they resulted in the birth of normal, healthy live lambs. In addition, the immunization regime used in the current experiment did not appear to affect luteal function as no differences were noted in the concentrations of progesterone in sera of immunized ewes. This study was not designed to examine the effects of GDF9 or BMP15 immunization on increasing lamb production. Such studies are underway and require much larger numbers of animals. However, because no untoward effects were noted on pregnancy outcomes, albeit with small number of ewes, there is a reasonable expectancy that immunization of sheep with GDF9 or BMP15 will lead to increased lamb production.
In summary, short-term immunization against either BMP15 or GDF9 peptides resulted in increased ovulation rate with no apparent detrimental effect on fertilization of released oocytes, ability of fertilized oocytes to undergo normal fetal development, or the ability of immunized ewes to carry a pregnancy to term. Therefore, regulation of BMP15, GDF9, or both is potentially a new technique for enhancing fecundity in some mammals.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Correspondence: Ken McNatty, Wallaceville Animal Research Centre, Ward Street, P.O. Box 40063, Upper Hutt, New Zealand. FAX: 64 4 922 1380; kenneth.mcnatty{at}agresearch.co.nz ![]()
Received: 16 September 2003.
First decision: 13 October 2003.
Accepted: 17 October 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. B. Gilchrist, M. Lane, and J. G. Thompson Oocyte-secreted factors: regulators of cumulus cell function and oocyte quality Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 159 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J Spicer, P. Y Aad, D. T Allen, S. Mazerbourg, A. H Payne, and A. J Hsueh Growth Differentiation Factor 9 (GDF9) Stimulates Proliferation and Inhibits Steroidogenesis by Bovine Theca Cells: Influence of Follicle Size on Responses to GDF9 Biol Reprod, February 1, 2008; 78(2): 243 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Clelland, Q. Tan, A. Balofsky, R. Lacivita, and C. Peng Inhibition of Premature Oocyte Maturation: A Role for Bone Morphogenetic Protein 15 in Zebrafish Ovarian Follicles Endocrinology, November 1, 2007; 148(11): 5451 - 5458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Russell and R. L. Robker Molecular mechanisms of ovulation: co-ordination through the cumulus complex Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2007; 13(3): 289 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. McNatty, N. L. Hudson, L. Whiting, K. L. Reader, S. Lun, A. Western, D. A. Heath, P. Smith, L. G. Moore, and J. L. Juengel The Effects of Immunizing Sheep with Different BMP15 or GDF9 Peptide Sequences on Ovarian Follicular Activity and Ovulation Rate Biol Reprod, April 1, 2007; 76(4): 552 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L J Spicer, P Y Aad, D Allen, S Mazerbourg, and A J Hsueh Growth differentiation factor-9 has divergent effects on proliferation and steroidogenesis of bovine granulosa cells. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2006; 189(2): 329 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L Juengel, K. L Reader, A. H Bibby, S. Lun, I. Ross, L. J Haydon, and K. P McNatty The role of bone morphogenetic proteins 2, 4, 6 and 7 during ovarian follicular development in sheep: contrast to rat. Reproduction, March 1, 2006; 131(3): 501 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Clelland, G. Kohli, R. K. Campbell, S. Sharma, S. Shimasaki, and C. Peng Bone Morphogenetic Protein-15 in the Zebrafish Ovary: Complementary Deoxyribonucleic Acid Cloning, Genomic Organization, Tissue Distribution, and Role in Oocyte Maturation Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 201 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Hashimoto, R. K. Moore, and S. Shimasaki Posttranslational processing of mouse and human BMP-15: Potential implication in the determination of ovulation quota PNAS, April 12, 2005; 102(15): 5426 - 5431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P McNatty, J. L Juengel, K. L Reader, S. Lun, S. Myllymaa, S. B Lawrence, A. Western, M. F Meerasahib, D. G Mottershead, N. P Groome, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 15 and growth differentiation factor 9 co-operate to regulate granulosa cell function Reproduction, April 1, 2005; 129(4): 473 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P McNatty, J. L Juengel, K. L Reader, S. Lun, S. Myllymaa, S. B Lawrence, A. Western, M. F Meerasahib, D. G Mottershead, N. P Groome, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 15 and growth differentiation factor 9 co-operate to regulate granulosa cell function in ruminants Reproduction, April 1, 2005; 129(4): 481 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.L. Juengel and K.P. McNatty The role of proteins of the transforming growth factor-{beta} superfamily in the intraovarian regulation of follicular development Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 144 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.B. Gilchrist, L.J. Ritter, M. Cranfield, L.A. Jeffery, F. Amato, S.J. Scott, S. Myllymaa, N. Kaivo-Oja, H. Lankinen, D.G. Mottershead, et al. Immunoneutralization of Growth Differentiation Factor 9 Reveals It Partially Accounts for Mouse Oocyte Mitogenic Activity Biol Reprod, September 1, 2004; 71(3): 732 - 739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. X. Liao, R. K. Moore, and S. Shimasaki Functional and Molecular Characterization of Naturally Occurring Mutations in the Oocyte-secreted Factors Bone Morphogenetic Protein-15 and Growth and Differentiation Factor-9 J. Biol. Chem., April 23, 2004; 279(17): 17391 - 17396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |