Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 29, 2003.
Biol Reprod 2003, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.023333
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/3/557    most recent
biolreprod.103.023333v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juengel, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by McNatty, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Juengel, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by McNatty, K. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Juengel, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by McNatty, K. P.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 70, 557–561 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.023333
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Ovary

Effects of Immunization Against Bone Morphogenetic Protein 15 and Growth Differentiation Factor 9 on Ovulation Rate, Fertilization, and Pregnancy in Ewes1

Jennifer L. Juengel, Norma L. Hudson, Lynda Whiting, and Kenneth P. McNatty2

AgResearch, Wallaceville Animal Research Centre, Upper Hutt, New Zealand


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Immunization of ewes against growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) or bone morphogenetic protein 15 (BMP15) can lead to an increased ovulation rate; however, it is not known whether normal pregnancies occur following such treatments. The aims of the present study were to determine the effects of a short-term immunization regimen against BMP15 and GDF9 on ovulation rate, fertilization of released oocytes, the ability of fertilized oocytes to undergo normal fetal development, and the ability of immunized ewes to carry a pregnancy to term. Ewes were given a primary and booster immunization against keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH; control, n = 50), a GDF9-specific peptide conjugated to KLH (GDF9, n = 30), or a BMP15-specific peptide conjugated to KLH (BMP15, n = 30). The estrous cycles of all ewes were synchronized, and ewes were joined with fertile rams approximately 14 days after the booster immunization. The number of corpora lutea was determined by laparoscopy 3–4 days following mating. Subsequently, about one-half of the ewes in each group underwent an embryo transfer procedure 4–6 days following mating, with the embryos being transferred to synchronized, nonimmunized recipients. The remaining ewes were allowed to carry their pregnancies to term. Short-term immunization against either BMP15 or GDF9 peptides resulted in an increase in ovulation rate with no apparent detrimental affects on fertilization of released oocytes, the ability of fertilized oocytes to undergo normal fetal development, or the ability of the immunized ewes to carry a pregnancy to term. Therefore, regulation of BMP15, GDF9, or both is potentially a new technique to enhance fecundity in some mammals.

ovary, pregnancy, corpus luteum, follicle, growth factors


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) and bone morphogenetic protein 15 (BMP15 also known as GDF9B) are related members of the transforming growth factor ß (TGFß) superfamily that are produced by the ovary and have profound effects on fertility [1, 2]. In mice, GDF9 [3] but not BMP15 [4] is essential for normal follicular development. However, in sheep, both GDF9 and BMP15 are essential for normal follicular growth [5], as repeated, long-term immunizations against either GDF9 or BMP15 results in cessation of follicular growth. Morphological examination of the ovaries of immunized ewes revealed that normal follicular growth past the type 2 or primary stage was rarely observed in ewes immunized against either GDF9 or BMP15 [5]. In particular, it was found that luteal function was often abnormal as assessed from plasma progesterone concentrations, and the oocytes were abnormal in appearance, being enlarged and surrounded by an irregular arrangement of granulosa cells in the cumulus complex. Abnormalities in oocytes have also been observed in GDF9 knockout mice [6], and while follicular growth appears normal in BMP15 knockout mice, these mice have smaller litters due to reduced fertilization [4]. In sheep, the function of the corpus luteum (CL), as measured by secretion of progesterone, was also abnormal following passive immunization of ewes against GDF9 [5].

In addition to their essential role in follicular growth, both of these oocyte-derived growth factors influence ovulation rate in sheep ([2, 5, 79] and J. Hanrahan and S. Galloway, personal communication). Indeed, we have recently shown an increase in ovulation rate in some ewes when immunized against BMP15 or GDF9 using a dextran-based adjuvant [2]. However, based on the observed abnormalities in long-term or passively immunized ewes, it was unclear whether neutralization of a portion of BMP15 or GDF9 would affect subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Furthermore, alterations in pregnancy outcomes potentially could be attributed to a change in oocyte function or insufficient luteal function. Therefore, the objectives of this experiment were to determine the effect of short-term immunization against BMP15 and GDF9 on ovulation rate, fertilization of released oocytes, ability of fertilized oocytes to undergo normal fetal development, and the ability of immunized ewes to carry a pregnancy to term.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
All experiments were performed with the approval of the Animal Ethics Committee at Wallaceville Animal Research Centre in accordance with the 1999 Animal Welfare Act Regulations of New Zealand. All animals had ad libitum access to pasture and water. Except where indicated, laboratory chemicals were obtained from BDH Chemicals New Zealand Ltd (Palmerston North, New Zealand), Invitrogen (Auckland, New Zealand), or Roche Diagnostics N.Z. Ltd. (Auckland, New Zealand).

Immunization of Ewes Against GDF9 and BMP15

The peptides KKPLVPASVNLSEYFC (GDF9) and SEVPGPSREHDGPESC (BMP15) were synthesized and conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) through the C-terminal cysteine residue by Macromolecular Resources (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO). These peptides were chosen based on the dissimilarity of the peptide sequence with other members of the TGFß superfamily as assessed by a basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) search for short, nearly exact, matches [10] and previous results indicating that immunization against these peptides influenced ovulation rate [2, 5]. Sexually mature Romney ewes (approximately 50 kg, 4–6 yr old) were given a primary immunization with 0.4 mg KLH (N = 50, KLH), KLH-GDF9 (n = 30, GDF9) or KLH-BMP15 (n = 30, BMP15) in 5% (w/v) DEAE-dextran adjuvant followed by a 0.2 mg booster injection 4 wk later. The estrous cycles of the immunized ewes were synchronized at the time of the booster by giving an intravaginal controlled internal drug release device (CIDR; Pharmacia & Upjohn Limited Company, Auckland, New Zealand) containing progesterone for 13 days, with Estrumate (125 µg; Schering-Plough Animal Health Limited, Upper Hutt, New Zealand) given on Day 12 to induce luteolysis of any remaining CL. To maintain progesterone levels, the initial CIDR was replaced with a new CIDR on Day 10. At the time the replacement CIDR was removed, intact sexually mature Poll Dorset rams (n = 2), fitted with mating harnesses and crayons for determination of mating, were introduced to the immunized ewes. In addition, the estrous cycles of nonimmunized sexually mature Romney ewes were synchronized at the same time using identical procedures. The number of CL was determined by laparoscopy in all immunized ewes 3 days after mating. Embryos from approximately one-half of the ewes in each treatment group (KLH, n = 26; GDF9, n = 15; BMP15, n = 16) were surgically transferred to synchronized recipients (n = 43) on Days 4–6 of the estrous cycle as previously described [11]. All ewes having four or more CL, most ewes with three CL, as well as a random selection of ewes with one or two CL were selected to undergo the embryo transfer procedure. Recipients received one to three embryos each. The number of CL in the ewes from which embryos were recovered was also determined during the subsequent estrous cycle that was induced by an injection of Estrumate given on approximately Day 10 of the estrous cycle. The ewes not subjected to embryo transfer were allowed to carry their pregnancies to term.

Determination of Antibody Titers and Cross-Reactivity

Sera were collected from all immunized ewes prior to immunization and 2 wk after the booster immunization for determination of reactivity to GDF9 and BMP15. Antibody titers and cross-reactivity were determined by ELISA as described [5] with the following modifications: Sera samples were diluted to 1:10 000 from the BMP15 and KLH immunized animals to measure antibody titers for BMP15, whereas sera samples were diluted to 1:1000 from the GDF9 and KLH immunized animals for measurement of antibody titers for GDF9. In addition, the amount of Escherichia coli-expressed mature region of ovine GDF9 coated onto each well was increased to 200 ng and the incubation time for the interaction of sera and antigen was reduced to 1 h.

Determination of Concentrations of Progesterone in Plasma

Plasma was collected from all immunized ewes at Days 1, 3 (administration of PGF2{alpha} analogue), 4 (removal of CIDR), 5 (estrus), 7, and 9. Blood samples from those ewes that did not undergo the embryo flushing procedure were also collected at Days 14 and 19, and approximately every 10 days thereafter until Day 105 of pregnancy. Blood samples were also collected from recipient ewes beginning on the day they received an embryo and then with the same schedule as the immunized ewes carrying a pregnancy to term. The concentrations of progesterone in plasma were determined by RIA as previously described [12]. The sensitivity of the assay was 0.1 ng/ml, and the average interassay and intra-assay coefficients of variation were less then 10%.

Statistical Analysis

Antibody response was determined by comparing the optical density (OD) reading before immunization to those 2 wk following the booster immunization by paired t-test. One ewe in the BMP15 immunized group was excluded as she was shown to have nonspecific binding to BSA in her preimmune serum sample. Because no specific displacement was observed with the potentially cross-reacting protein for any animal, maximum cross-reactivity was calculated by expressing the concentration of specific protein required to displace 50% of maximum binding as a percentage of the maximum amount of cross-reacting protein tested in the assay. Animals in which the maximum binding was not determined were excluded from analyses.

Ovulation rate was calculated as the number of CL at a single observation (i.e., in ewes carrying pregnancy to term) or averaged for two observations (i.e., in ewes whose embryos were transferred to recipients). Four ewes in the BMP15 immunized group did not show estrus for approximately 30 days. For these animals, the ovulation rates were calculated by counting the number of CL after the first ovulation (two ewes) or following the first two ovulations (two ewes). Differences in ovulation rate were determined using chi-square analysis following grouping of the animals into three classes; namely, those with mean ovulation rates of 1 to <2, 2 to <3, or >=3.

Differences in fertilization rates were determined using chi-square analysis by considering whether or not an embryo was recovered for every CL present on the ovary. In all groups, the data from ovaries in which flushing of the oviduct was noted as incomplete were excluded. Differences in embryo survival were determined using chi-square analysis after considering whether a lamb was born following transfer of an embryo. Three embryos from the BMP15 group were not transferred. Two of the embryos were from one of the ewes that was anestrous for approximately 30 days and were more advanced than anticipated at recovery and thus were not recovered whole, the third embryo was lost during the transfer procedure.

Differences in lambing percentages were determined by comparing the percentage of ewes carrying a pregnancy to term using chi-square analysis. One ewe in the KLH immunized group became ill and was killed shortly after breeding and was thus excluded from further analysis. Differences in the proportion of released oocytes (as assessed by number of CL) that resulted in the birth of a lamb in the immunized ewes were also determined by chi-square analysis. Effects of immunization on concentrations of progesterone in plasma were assessed using an ante-dependence analysis of order 1 in Genstat following natural log transformation of the data. Where progesterone values were at or below the sensitivity of the assay, a value of 0.1 ng/ml (i.e., the sensitivity of the assay) was assigned for the above analysis.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Antibody Titers and Cross-Reactivities

Ewes immunized with KLH did not have measurable antibodies to either GDF9 or BMP15 (Table 1). Although a small amount of binding was observed to GDF9, this was deemed nonspecific, because binding levels did not increase following immunization. No binding was observed to BMP15 in sera collected from ewes prior to immunization or following immunization with KLH. Ewes immunized against GDF9 had measurable antibodies against GDF9 (P < 0.001) and those immunized against BMP15 had measurable antibodies against BMP15 (P < 0.001). Maximum cross-reactivity of antisera collected from BMP15 immunized ewes (n = 28) to GDF9 averaged 1.2% (range 0.1%–3.2%) and, where they were measurable (n = 12 ewes), maximum cross-reactivity of ewes immunized against GDF9 to BMP15 averaged 1.8% (range 0.8%–3.0%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Mean ± SEM optical density readings following ELISA using specified coating antigens of sera samples pre- and postimmunization

Effect of Immunization on Ovulation Rate, Fertilization of Oocytes, Embryo Survival, and Lambing Percentages

Immunization against either GDF9 or BMP15 increased ovulation rate when compared to KLH immunized control ewes (P < 0.001; Fig. 1). The mean ovulation rates for the KLH, GDF9, and BMP15 immunized ewes were 1.8, 2.2, and 2.6, respectively. Neither the ability of ovulated oocytes to be fertilized nor embryo survival was affected by immunization against either GDF9 or BMP15 (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the ability of a ewe to carry her pregnancy to term was not affected by immunization against either GDF9 or BMP15 (Fig. 3).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Distribution of ovulation rate in KLH (n = 50), GDF9 (n = 30), and BMP15 (n = 30) immunized ewes. Distribution of ovulation rate in GDF9 and BMP15 immunized ewes was different from that observed in KLH immunized ewes (P < 0.01)



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Percentages of embryos recovered based on the number of CL and percentages of lambs born per embryo transferred. Total numbers of CL were 48, 38, and 46 for KLH, GDF9, and BMP15 immunized ewes, respectively. Total numbers of embryos transferred were 32, 23, and 20 for the KLH, GDF9, and BMP15 immunized ewes, respectively. No significant differences were observed among treatments



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Percentages of ewes lambing and the percentages of lambs born based on the number of CL present at laparoscopy. Total numbers of ewes left to lamb were 23, 14, and 13 for the KLH, GDF9, and BMP15 immunized groups, respectively. Total numbers of CL present at laparoscopy were 36, 23, and 26 for the KLH, GDF9, and BMP15 immunized groups, respectively. No differences were observed among groups

Effects of Immunization on Secretion of Progesterone During Pregnancy

Immunization against BMP15 or GDF9 did not affect the pattern of secretion of progesterone during the first estrous cycle (Fig. 4). In addition, the concentrations of progesterone in pregnant immunized or recipient ewes were not different among the groups (Figs. 4 and 5).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Mean concentrations of progesterone (P4) in plasma of all immunized ewes not undergoing the embryo transfer procedure during the first 20 days of sampling. There were no significant differences among treatments



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Mean concentrations of progesterone in plasma of pregnant immunized ewes (top) and ewes carrying an embryo from an immunized ewe to term (bottom). Within a group (immunized or recipient), there were no significant differences among treatments


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A short-term immunization against either GDF9 or BMP15 using a DEAE dextran adjuvant increased ovulation rate in ewes. The increased ovulation rate following immunization was due to specific neutralization of GDF9 or BMP15, because very little if any cross-reaction was observed when tested against its most closely related family member (i.e., BMP15 for GDF9 and GDF9 for BMP15). These findings confirm our results from an earlier, preliminary study in which some ewes had increased ovulation rates following immunization with either an E. coli expressed mature region of ovine GDF9 or BMP15 or the peptides used in the present study [2]. In addition, this is in agreement with increased ovulation rates observed in ewes heterozygous for inactivating mutations in either BMP15 or GDF9 ([9] and J. Hanrahan and S. Galloway, personal communication).

It has been hypothesized that the mutation in Inverdale sheep alters follicular development by changing the processing of GDF9 and thus decreasing GDF9 secretion and that this reduction in GDF9 levels may be involved in the infertility observed in homozygous Inverdale ewes [13]. This hypothesis is based on the reduced expression of the mature form of GDF9 and BMP15 in cells coexpressing the mutant Inverdale form of BMP15 and normal GDF9. The present results are inconsistent with the effects of the Inverdale mutation being mediated through reduced secretion of GDF9, because it is unlikely that an antibody would be able to influence intracellular processing of BMP15 or GDF9. Based on the current study, we hypothesize that in the regulation of ovulation rate in sheep, either BMP15 and GDF9 homodimers have essential but similar roles, or that BMP15/GDF9 heterodimers have essential roles, or both.

In sheep, long-term immunization against either the BMP15 or GDF9 peptides used in these trials with an adjuvant capable of eliciting a strong immune response (i.e., Freunds adjuvant) resulted in abnormal follicular development [5]. These abnormalities were particularly evident in the oocyte itself as well as the cumulous granulosa cells surrounding the oocyte. Neutralization of GDF9 also appeared to affect the function of the CL. Oocyte function is altered in mice lacking functional GDF9 [6], and fertilization is reduced in BMP15 knockout mice [4]. This suggests that both GDF9 and BMP15 may play essential roles in not only regulating ovulation rate but also oocyte health and establishment of pregnancy. In the current study, neutralization of sufficient amounts of GDF9 or BMP15 to increase ovulation rate did not appear to dramatically affect oocyte health or the ability of the embryo to develop. Immunized ewes were also able to carry a pregnancy to term. Similar results are observed in ewes heterozygous for the Inverdale gene, in which ovulation rate increases lead to a predicable increase in litter size [14]. It could be argued that neutralization of a large portion of GDF9 or BMP15, which would be predicted to lead to a superovulation type response, might result in reduced quality of oocytes released or decreased ability of the immunized ewe to carry a pregnancy to term. Some of the ewes in the present study immunized with BMP15 peptide did undergo a short period of anovulation before returning to estrous with increased ovulation rates. These oocytes were apparently healthy, as they resulted in the birth of normal, healthy live lambs. In addition, the immunization regime used in the current experiment did not appear to affect luteal function as no differences were noted in the concentrations of progesterone in sera of immunized ewes. This study was not designed to examine the effects of GDF9 or BMP15 immunization on increasing lamb production. Such studies are underway and require much larger numbers of animals. However, because no untoward effects were noted on pregnancy outcomes, albeit with small number of ewes, there is a reasonable expectancy that immunization of sheep with GDF9 or BMP15 will lead to increased lamb production.

In summary, short-term immunization against either BMP15 or GDF9 peptides resulted in increased ovulation rate with no apparent detrimental effect on fertilization of released oocytes, ability of fertilized oocytes to undergo normal fetal development, or the ability of immunized ewes to carry a pregnancy to term. Therefore, regulation of BMP15, GDF9, or both is potentially a new technique for enhancing fecundity in some mammals.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Dr. George Davis for his helpful comments regarding the manuscript. The authors also thank Doug Jensen for the management of animal care; Laurel Quirke, Peter Smith, and James Fitzwater for assistance with sample collection and embryo transfers; Karen Reader and Steve Lawrence for assistance with determination of antibody titers; and Lilian Morrison for assistance with statistical analysis.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by the New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology, the Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund, and Ovita Limited, New Zealand. Back

2 Correspondence: Ken McNatty, Wallaceville Animal Research Centre, Ward Street, P.O. Box 40063, Upper Hutt, New Zealand. FAX: 64 4 922 1380; kenneth.mcnatty{at}agresearch.co.nz Back

Received: 16 September 2003.

First decision: 13 October 2003.

Accepted: 17 October 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Elvin JA, Yan C, Matzuk MM. At the cutting edge. Oocyte expressed TGFß superfamily members in female fertility. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000 159:1-5[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. McNatty KP, Juengel JL, Wilson T, Galloway SM, Davis GH, Hudson NL, Moeller CL, Cranfield M, Reader KL, Laitinen PME, Groome NP, Sawyer HR, Ritvos O. Oocyte-derived growth factors and ovulation rate in sheep. Reproduction 2003 (Suppl 61):S339–S351
  3. Dong J, Altertini DF, Nishimori K, Rajendra Kumar T, Lu N, Matzuk MM. Growth differentiation factor-9 is required during early ovarian folliculogenesis. Nature 1996 383:531-535[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Yan C, Wang P, DeMayo J, Demay FJ, Elvin JA, Carino C, Prasad SV, Skinner SS, Dunbar BS, Dube JL, Celeste AJ, Matzuk MM. Synergistic roles of bone morphogenetic protein 15 and growth differentiation factor 9 in ovarian function. Mol Endocrinol 2001 15:854-866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Juengel JL, Hudson NL, Heath DA, Smith P, Reader KL, Lawrence SB, O'Connell AR, Laitinen MPE, Cranfield M, Groome NP, Ritvos O, McNatty KP. Growth differentiation factor 9 and bone morphogenetic protein 15 are essential for ovarian follicular development in sheep. Biol Reprod 2002 67:1777-1789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Carabatsos MJ, Levin J, Matzuk MM, Albertini DF. Characterization of oocyte and follicle development in growth differentiation factor-9-deficient mice. Dev Biol 1998 204:373-384[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Davis GH, McEwan JC, Fennessy PF, Dodds KG, Farquhar PA. Evidence for the presence of a major gene influencing ovulation rate on the X chromosome of sheep. Biol Reprod 1991 44:620-640[Abstract]
  8. Galloway SM, McNatty KP, Cambridge LM, Laitinen MPE, Juengel JL, Jokiranta TS, McLaren RJ, Luiro K, Dodds KG, Montgomery GW, Beattie AE, Davis GH, Ritvos O. Mutations in an oocyte-derived growth factor gene (BMP15) cause increased ovulation rate and infertility in a dosage-sensitive manner. Nat Genet 2000 25:279-283[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Davis GH, Bruce GD, Dodds KG. Ovulation rate and litter size of prolific Inverdale (FecXI) and Hanna (FecXH) sheep. Proc Assoc Adv Animal Breed Genet 2001 14:175-178
  10. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990 215:403-410[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Smith P, O WS, Hudson NL, Shaw L, Heath DA, Condell L, Phillips DJ, McNatty KP. Effects of the Booroola gene (FecB) on body weight, ovarian development and hormone concentrations during fetal life. J Reprod Fertil 1993 98:41-54[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. McNatty KP, Gibb M, Dobson C, Thurley DC, Findlay JK. Changes in the concentration of gonadotropic and steroidal hormones in the antral fluid of ovarian follicles throughout the estrous cycle of sheep. Aust J Biol Sci 1981 34:67-80[Medline]
  13. Liao WX, Moore RK, Otsuka F, Shimasaki S. Effect of intracellular interactions on the processing and secretion of bone morphogenetic protein-15 (BMP-15) and growth and differentiation factor-9. Implication of the aberrant ovarian phenotype of BMP-15 mutant sheep. J Biol Chem 2003 278:3713-3719[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Davis GH, Dodds KG, McEwan JC, Fennessy PF. Liveweight, fleece weight and prolificacy of Romney ewes carrying the Inverdale prolificacy gene (FecXI) located on the X-chromosome. Livest Prod Sci 1993 34:83-91[CrossRef]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
R. B. Gilchrist, M. Lane, and J. G. Thompson
Oocyte-secreted factors: regulators of cumulus cell function and oocyte quality
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 159 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
L. J Spicer, P. Y Aad, D. T Allen, S. Mazerbourg, A. H Payne, and A. J Hsueh
Growth Differentiation Factor 9 (GDF9) Stimulates Proliferation and Inhibits Steroidogenesis by Bovine Theca Cells: Influence of Follicle Size on Responses to GDF9
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2008; 78(2): 243 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. S. Clelland, Q. Tan, A. Balofsky, R. Lacivita, and C. Peng
Inhibition of Premature Oocyte Maturation: A Role for Bone Morphogenetic Protein 15 in Zebrafish Ovarian Follicles
Endocrinology, November 1, 2007; 148(11): 5451 - 5458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
D. L. Russell and R. L. Robker
Molecular mechanisms of ovulation: co-ordination through the cumulus complex
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2007; 13(3): 289 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. P. McNatty, N. L. Hudson, L. Whiting, K. L. Reader, S. Lun, A. Western, D. A. Heath, P. Smith, L. G. Moore, and J. L. Juengel
The Effects of Immunizing Sheep with Different BMP15 or GDF9 Peptide Sequences on Ovarian Follicular Activity and Ovulation Rate
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2007; 76(4): 552 - 560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
L J Spicer, P Y Aad, D Allen, S Mazerbourg, and A J Hsueh
Growth differentiation factor-9 has divergent effects on proliferation and steroidogenesis of bovine granulosa cells.
J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2006; 189(2): 329 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J. L Juengel, K. L Reader, A. H Bibby, S. Lun, I. Ross, L. J Haydon, and K. P McNatty
The role of bone morphogenetic proteins 2, 4, 6 and 7 during ovarian follicular development in sheep: contrast to rat.
Reproduction, March 1, 2006; 131(3): 501 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. Clelland, G. Kohli, R. K. Campbell, S. Sharma, S. Shimasaki, and C. Peng
Bone Morphogenetic Protein-15 in the Zebrafish Ovary: Complementary Deoxyribonucleic Acid Cloning, Genomic Organization, Tissue Distribution, and Role in Oocyte Maturation
Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 201 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
O. Hashimoto, R. K. Moore, and S. Shimasaki
Posttranslational processing of mouse and human BMP-15: Potential implication in the determination of ovulation quota
PNAS, April 12, 2005; 102(15): 5426 - 5431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
K. P McNatty, J. L Juengel, K. L Reader, S. Lun, S. Myllymaa, S. B Lawrence, A. Western, M. F Meerasahib, D. G Mottershead, N. P Groome, et al.
Bone morphogenetic protein 15 and growth differentiation factor 9 co-operate to regulate granulosa cell function
Reproduction, April 1, 2005; 129(4): 473 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
K. P McNatty, J. L Juengel, K. L Reader, S. Lun, S. Myllymaa, S. B Lawrence, A. Western, M. F Meerasahib, D. G Mottershead, N. P Groome, et al.
Bone morphogenetic protein 15 and growth differentiation factor 9 co-operate to regulate granulosa cell function in ruminants
Reproduction, April 1, 2005; 129(4): 481 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J.L. Juengel and K.P. McNatty
The role of proteins of the transforming growth factor-{beta} superfamily in the intraovarian regulation of follicular development
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 144 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R.B. Gilchrist, L.J. Ritter, M. Cranfield, L.A. Jeffery, F. Amato, S.J. Scott, S. Myllymaa, N. Kaivo-Oja, H. Lankinen, D.G. Mottershead, et al.
Immunoneutralization of Growth Differentiation Factor 9 Reveals It Partially Accounts for Mouse Oocyte Mitogenic Activity
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2004; 71(3): 732 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. X. Liao, R. K. Moore, and S. Shimasaki
Functional and Molecular Characterization of Naturally Occurring Mutations in the Oocyte-secreted Factors Bone Morphogenetic Protein-15 and Growth and Differentiation Factor-9
J. Biol. Chem., April 23, 2004; 279(17): 17391 - 17396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/3/557    most recent
biolreprod.103.023333v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juengel, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by McNatty, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Juengel, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by McNatty, K. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Juengel, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by McNatty, K. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS