Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print September 3, 2003.
Biol Reprod 2003, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.020065
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/1/18    most recent
biolreprod.103.020065v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Izu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakai, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Izu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakai, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Izu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakai, A.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 70, 18–24 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.020065
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Gamete Biology

Heat Shock Transcription Factor 1 Is Involved in Quality-Control Mechanisms in Male Germ Cells1

Hanae Izu, Sachiye Inouye, Mitsuaki Fujimoto, Koji Shiraishi, Katsusuke Naito, and Akira Nakai2

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology3 Department of Urology,4 Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube 755-8505, Japan


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Quality-control mechanisms in spermatogenesis are important to eliminate injured or abnormal cells, thereby protecting the organism from abnormal development in the next generation. The processes of spermatogenesis are highly sensitive to high temperatures; however, the mechanisms by which injured germ cells are eliminated remain unclear. Here, we found that heat shock proteins are not induced in male germ cells in response to thermal stress, although heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1) is activated. Using HSF1-null mice, we showed that apoptosis of pachytene spermatocytes was markedly inhibited in testes with a single exposure to heat and in the cryptorchid testes, indicating that HSF1 promotes apoptotic cell death of pachytene spermatocytes exposed to thermal stress. In marked contrast, HSF1 acts as a cell-survival factor of more immature germ cells, probably including spermatogonia, in testes exposed to high temperatures. These results demonstrate that HSF1 has two opposite roles in male germ cells independent of the activation of heat shock genes.

signal transduction, spermatid, spermatogenesis, stress, testis


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Germ cells provide the continuity of life between generations. Mature sperm are the product of a precisely regulated process that involves remarkable structural and biochemical changes. Germ cells continuously proliferate and differentiate to supply a large amount of mature spermatozoa. During this process, up to 75% of potential spermatozoa are estimated to undergo apoptotic cell death in the testis of adult animals [13]. In addition to spontaneous cell death, the process of spermatogenesis is highly susceptible to stresses, such as high temperature [46]. Injured germ cells are selectively destroyed by an apoptotic mechanism that may be regulated by the p53 or Fas pathways [710]. However, our understanding of the quality-control mechanisms involved in spermatogenesis is limited.

Cellular proteins are denatured when cells or organisms encounter adverse environments, such as high temperatures. In general, denaturation and the subsequent aggregation of proteins are detrimental to cells and lead to cell death. To survive against these adverse environments, cells possess some mechanisms that enable them to cope with the accumulation of denatured proteins. Heat shock response, which is characterized by the induction of a set of heat shock proteins, is a fundamental response in all organisms to protect themselves [11]. Heat shock proteins bind to denatured proteins, prevent misaggregation, facilitate renaturation [12], and even disaggregate the aggregates [13].

Heat shock response is regulated mainly at the level of transcription by heat shock transcription factors (HSFs) [14]. Only one HSF gene is in yeast and in Drosophila, whereas three HSF genes (HSF1, HSF2, and HSF4 genes) have been identified in mammals [15, 16]. Cells can survive against an exposure to lethal temperatures when they are preincubated at sublethal high temperatures. This phenomenon is known as induced thermotolerance [11]. The heat shock response regulated by HSF1 is necessary for the induced thermotolerance [1719]. Furthermore, HSF1 promotes cell survival against various stresses by up-regulating a specific heat shock gene in the absence of stress [20]. Moreover, HSF1 can protect against cell death by unknown mechanisms that are independent of the activation of heat shock genes (see Discussion) [21]. All these observations demonstrate that HSFs act as cell-survival factors.

We previously suggested another unique function of HSF1, different from the roles of HSFs that protect against cell death, in male germ cells. Transgenic mice expressing an active HSF1 in the testes are infertile because of a block in spermatogenesis [22]. This observation suggests that HSF1 activated by elevated temperatures may induce cell death of male germ cells. Because HSF1 is one of the components that sense protein denaturation and mediate cellular response [15], we proposed that HSF1 eliminates germ cells suffering from thermal stress. However, we could not rule out artificial effects of overexpressing the mutant HSF1. To extend these observations, we analyzed the testes of HSF1-null mice exposed to thermal stress.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Exposure of Mouse Testis to Hyperthermia

Exposure of mice testis to hyperthermia and tissue preparation were performed as described previously [22], except for the protocol for anesthetizing mice. Anesthetizing solution (20 ml) was made by mixing 1.6 ml of Veterinary Ketalar 50 (Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan), 4 ml of Seractal 2% (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany), and 14.4 ml of water. Mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 8 µl/g of anesthetizing solution. All experimental protocols were reviewed by the Committee for Ethics on Animal Experiments of Yamaguchi University School of Medicine.

In Situ Hybridization

The testes were dissected immediately after the mice were killed, fixed in Bouin fixative at 4°C for 16–24 h, and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections (thickness, 5 µm) were dewaxed and rehydrated. After soaking in PBS treated with diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC), sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS at room temperature for 20 min and then washed with three changes of DEPC-PBS. Sections were treated with 0.2 N HCl/DEPC-PBS for 10 min, washed, soaked in 0.1 M triethanolamine-HCl (pH 8.0)/0.25% acetic anhydride at 4°C for 10 min, washed, and then treated with 2 µg/ml of proteinase K/DEPC-PBS at 37°C for 10 min. After washing in three changes of DEPC-PBS, sections were dehydrated and air-dried. To perform hybridization, sections were soaked in hybridization solution (50% formamide, 10 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8.0], 0.2 mg/ml of yeast tRNA, 1x Denhardt solution, 10% dextran sulfate, 600 mM NaCl, 0.25% SDS, and 1 mM EDTA) containing digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled probe (1 µg/ml) at 55°C for 16 h. After washing in 50% formamide/2x SSC (1x SSC: 0.15 M sodium chloride and 0.015 M sodium citrate) at 55°C for 60 min and then in wash buffer (500 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-Cl [pH8.0]) at room temperature for 10 min, the sections were treated with 20 µg/ml of RNase in wash buffer at 37°C for 30 min. These were washed in 2x SSC at 55°C for 30 min and then in 0.2x SSC at 55°C for 30 min. To perform immunoreaction, the sections were first blocked with 2% blocking reagent (Roche, Mannheim, Germany)/buffer 1 (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.5]) and then soaked in alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-DIG antibody (Roche)/2% blocking reagent (1:3000 dilution) at 4°C for 24 h or at 37°C for 60 min. After the sections were washed with buffer 2 (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM MgCl2, 100 mM Tris-Cl [pH 9.5]), the immunocomplex was visualized with NBT/BCIP (Roche) in buffer 2 (1:50 dilution) at 37°C for 2–4 h. The reaction was stopped with buffer 3 (1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8.0]) and mounted with Pristine Mount (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL).

The DIG-labeled probes were generated according to the manufacturer's instructions using each specific cDNA inserted in pGEM7 vector (Promega, Madison, WI). The cDNA fragments of mouse Hsp70-1 (306 base pairs [bp]) and Hsp70-2 (433 bp) isolated from EcoRI fragments of pmHsp70-1 and pmHsp70-2 [22], respectively, were ligated into pGEM7 vector. Mouse Hsp27 cDNA isolated from a 540-bp HindIII fragment of pmHsp27 [23] and Hsp110 cDNA isolated from a 400-bp SacI/HindIII fragment of pmHsp105 were ligated into pGEM7 vector. To isolate mouse Hsp90{alpha} cDNA, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to generate a 564-bp fragment using primers human Hsp90-1 (5'-AAA GAA GGC CTG GAA CT-3') and human Hsp90-2 (5'-TCT ACT TCT TCC ATG CG-3'). The fragment was ligated into pGEM7 vector.

Northern Blot Hybridization

The RNA isolation and Northern blot analysis were performed as described previously [22]. A 603-bp mouse Hsp90ß cDNA fragment was amplified by PCR using an RT reaction generated from total RNA of mouse brain. The primers used were as follows: 5'-mHsp90ß, 5'-CAG AAT TCA TGA AGA TTC CAC TAA CC-3'; 3'-mHsp90ß, 5'-CAG AAT TCG TGC CGC AGG GTC TCC ACG-3'. After being digested with EcoRI, the fragment was ligated into pGEM7 vector. A 619-bp mouse Hsc70 cDNA fragment and a 591-bp mouse Hsp60 cDNA fragment were similarly generated using each specific primer. The primers used were as follows: mHsc70-1, 5'-CGC GGA TCC AGG GCC ATG ACC AAG GAC-3'; mHsc70-2, 5'-CGC GGA TCC CCT CTT CAA TGG TGG GGC-3'; mHsp60-1, 5'-CGC GGA TCC GAG CAG CTA GAC ATC ACA AC-3'; mHsp60-2, 5'-CGC GGA TCC CAT GCC GCC TCC CAT ACC-3'. After being digested with BamHI, the fragments were ligated into pGEM7 vector.

Histopathology and In Situ Detection of Apoptotic Cells

The testes were dissected immediately after the mice were killed, fixed in Bouin fixative at 4°C for 16–24 h, embedded in paraffin, and cut into sections (thickness, 5 µm) [22]. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and for apoptotic cells by the TUNEL method using an apoptosis in situ detection kit (Wako Pure Chemical Co., Osaka, Japan). To identify stages of seminiferous tubules, sections were stained with periodic acid-Schiff and counterstained with methyl green.

Experimental Cryptorchidism

Mice were anesthetized as described above. The bilateral testes and the spermatic cords were exposed, paying attention not to injure the vasculatures, and the gubernaculum was cut. Testis descent was prevented by closure of the inguinal canal on both sides by suturing with 3–0 silk [24].

Gel Shift Assay

Testes were dissected 12, 24, 36, and 48 h after cryptorchid surgery. Whole-cell extracts were prepared and gel shift assay performed as described previously using a probe for an ideal heat shock element (HSE) [22].


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Heat Shock Genes Are Not Activated in Response to Heat Shock in Male Germ Cells

Anesthetized mice were simply submerged in a water bath at 43°C for 15 min and then allowed to recover for up to 10 h, and the expression of heat shock genes was then analyzed by in situ hybridization. We found that Hsp70-1, Hsp110, and Hsp27 mRNAs were highly induced after heat shock in the interstitial Leydig cells, whereas the induction of these mRNAs was hardly detected in cells within seminiferous tubules containing germ cells and somatic Sertoli cells (Fig. 1, A–G). Northern blot analysis using total RNAs isolated from the whole testes showed that Hsp70-1, Hsp110, and Hsp27 mRNAs were slightly induced compared to the marked induction of these heat shock genes in mouse embryonic fibroblast cells exposed to heat shock (Fig. 1J). To rule out the possibility that the mRNAs in germ cells could not be detected, Hsp90{alpha} [25] and testis-specific Hsp70-2 [26] mRNAs were shown to be highly expressed in germ cells (Fig. 1, H and I). We also examined the expression of heat shock genes in transgenic mice expressing an active human HSF1 [22]. Induction of Hsp70-1 (Fig. 1C), Hsp110, and Hsp27 (data not shown) mRNAs was not detected in the testes of the transgenic mice even though the active human HSF1 was expressed in the germ cells. These results clearly demonstrate that mRNAs of major heat shock genes are hardly induced in vivo in response to heat shock in male germ cells.



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Expression of heat shock genes is not induced in male germ cells. Testicles of anesthetized mice were submerged in a water bath at 43°C for 15 min and then allowed to recover for 5 h. In situ hybridization was performed on the control (A, D, F, H, and I) and heat-treated (B, E, and G) testes and the control testes expressing an active HSF1 (C) [22] using antisense probes specific for mouse Hsp70-1 (AC), Hsp110 (D and E), Hsp27 (F and G), Hsp90{alpha} (H), and a testis-specific Hsp70-2 (I). No signal was detected using control sense probes (data not shown). Note that mRNAs of heat shock genes are hardly induced in cells of the seminiferous tubules. Total RNA was isolated from the control testis (C), and testes were heat-treated at 43°C for 15 min and allowed to recover for 0, 1, 3, and 5 h (J). Total RNAs were also isolated from control mouse embryo fibroblast (MEF) cells (C) and cells that were heat-shocked at 42°C for 1 h (H). Northern blot analysis was performed with the same probes used for in situ hybridization. Magnification x200 (AI)



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Expressions of heat shock genes in HSF1-null mice. A) Protein levels of HSF1, HSF2, and HSF4. Whole-cell extracts from testes of wild-type (+/+) and HSF1-null (-/-) mice were subjected to Western blot analysis. B) Expressions of major heat shock genes were examined by Northern blot analysis. Total RNAs were isolated from testes of mice in each genotype among a litter. C) Induction of mRNAs of heat shock genes in the control testes (C) and testes exposed to thermal stress (HS). Testicles were submerged in a water bath at 43°C for 15 min and then allowed to recover for 5 h. Total RNA was isolated, and Northern blot analysis was performed. D) Induction of Hsp70 proteins in the testes exposed to thermal stress. Testicles were submerged in a water bath at 43°C for 15 min and then allowed to recover for 5 h. Whole-cell extracts were prepared from the testes, and Western blot analysis was performed using monoclonal antibody specific to Hsp70 (W27; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and antiserum recognizing Hsp70 family proteins (anti-cHsp70a)

Normal Spermatogenesis in HSF1-Null Mice

We previously showed that HSF1 is expressed in most cells in the germinal epithelium [22]. We next analyzed the testes of HSF1-null mice in which the HSF1 gene was mutated by gene targeting [21]. Male mice were fertile, and no abnormality was detected in the weight and histology of the testis of HSF1-null mice (data not shown) (Fig. 3). The level of HSF2 protein in the testis of HSF1-null mice was the same as that in wild-type mice, and HSF4 protein was undetectable in both wild-type and HSF1-null mice (Fig. 2A). The expression of major heat shock genes, Hsp110, Hsp90{alpha}, Hsp90ß, Hsp70-1, Hsc70, Hsp60, Hsp40, Hsp27, and testis-specific Hsp70-2, was not altered in the testes in HSF1-null mice compared to those in wild-type mice (Fig. 2B).



View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Germ cell death induced by a single exposure to heat. Testicles of mice were submerged in a water bath at 43°C for 15 min and then allowed to recover for the indicated times (AH). Testes were dissected, fixed, and embedded in paraffin. Sections (thickness, 5 µm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (AD). Apoptotic cells were detected by TUNEL staining and were counterstained with methyl green (EH). Sections identical to those shown in G and H were stained with periodic acid-Schiff and counterstained with methyl green (IL). Seminiferous tubules in stages V and XI–XII are shown. Arrows indicate dead cells. Total numbers of apoptotic cells identified by TUNEL staining were counted in 200 tubules/testis (M); means and SDs of three independent experiments are shown. Magnification x100 (AD), x200 (EH), x1000 (IL, insets in G and H)

To examine whether HSF1 is essential for the heat shock response in the testis, testicles of anesthetized mice were subjected to heat shock, and Northern and Western blot analyses were performed. We observed no induction of the mRNA levels and protein levels of Hsp110, Hsp70, and Hsp27 (Fig. 2, C and D), suggesting that induction of heat shock proteins in response to heat shock is regulated at the level of transcription by HSF1 in the testes.

Cell Death of Spermatocytes Induced by Thermal Stress Is Inhibited in HSF1-Null Mice

We examined the histology of the testes when they were exposed to 43°C for 15 min and then allowed to recover for 12 and 16 h. In wild-type mice, condensation of the nuclei of germ cells was evident 8 h after heat shock (data not shown). Twelve hours after heat shock, some germ cells were detached from the germinal epithelium in most of the seminiferous tubules, and later, the entire tubules were destroyed (Fig. 3) [27]. In marked contrast, the condensation of the nuclei of germ cells and the detachment of germ cells were less evident until 16 h after heat shock in HSF1-null mice. To quantify the cell death of germ cells, TUNEL staining was performed to detect apoptotic cells [22]. Few apoptotic cells were found in the control testes in both wild-type and HSF1-null mice. The numbers of apoptotic cells per tubule in wild-type and HSF1-null mice were 11.0 ± 1.8 and 4.4 ± 1.0, respectively, at 8 h of recovery and 21.4 ± 3.5 and 11.3 ± 2.4, respectively, at 12 h of recovery (Fig. 3M).

We next determined which cells die in response to heat shock. In the tubules of wild-type mice, apoptotic cells were observed mostly in the inner layer of the germinal epithelium, and a few apoptotic cells having relatively large nuclei were observed in the outermost layer (Fig. 3G). The localization and morphology suggested that the apoptotic cells were mostly pachytene spermatocytes [20, 28, 29]. In marked contrast, fewer pachytene spermatocytes were TUNEL-positive in HSF1-null mice (Fig. 3H). We further stained these sections with periodic acid-Schiff to identify stages of seminiferous tubules. Although few pachytene spermatocytes at stage V died after heat shock in wild-type mice (Fig. 3I), many pachytene spermatocytes at stages XI–XII died in the same tubules (Fig. 3K). In contrast, few pachytene spermatocytes at stages XI–XII died in HSF1-null mice (Fig. 3L). The stage-specific susceptibility to heat is mainly caused by the effect of supporting Sertoli cells [29]. These results demonstrate that HSF1 promotes heat shock-induced cell death of pachytene spermatocytes.

Cell Death of Spermatogonia Exposed to Thermal Stress Is Protected by HSF1

It was shown by TUNEL staining that a substantial fraction of the apoptotic cells was observed in the outermost layer of the tubules in HSF1-null mice (Fig. 3H). Furthermore, clusters of cells located in the outermost layer of the tubules at stage V died (Fig. 3J). These results suggest that the apoptotic cells are not pachytene spermatocytes but, instead, are more immature germ cells, probably including spermatogonia. These immature cells do not die in the tubules at stage V in wild-type mice (Fig. 3I), indicating that cell death of undifferentiated germ cells exposed to heat shock is inhibited by HSF1. Interestingly, this function of HSF1 is independent of the induction of heat shock proteins as shown in Figure 1.

Cell Death of Spermatocytes after Surgical Induction of Cryptorchidism Was Inhibited in HSF1-Null Mice

Germ cell death induced in the cryptorchid testes is caused mainly by exposure of the testes to a relatively high abdominal temperature. Pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids are highly susceptible to the experimental cryptorchidism [30, 31], as they are to exposure to heat [28, 29]. Therefore, we next examined the germ cell death induced by bilateral cryptorchidism for 7 days in wild-type and HSF1-null mice. In wild-type mice, many degenerating pachytene spermatocytes were found (Fig. 4A, a and b). The TUNEL staining showed that 21.5 ± 9.6 cells per seminiferous tubule were TUNEL-positive (Fig. 4B). In marked contrast, only a slight germ cell degeneration (2.7 ± 4.5 cells/tubule) was observed in the cryptorchid testes in HSF1-null mice (Fig. 4, A and B). The DNA-binding activity of HSF1 was clearly activated in the cryptorchid testes examined by gel shift assay (Fig. 4C). These results conclusively showed that HSF1 promotes heat shock-induced cell death of pachytene spermatocytes.



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Germ cell death in the cryptorchid testis. A) Bilateral cryptorchidism was experimentally induced in mice. TUNEL staining (a and c) and hematoxylin-and-eosin staining (b and d) of the testes 7 days after surgical induction of the cryptorchidism were performed in three wild-type (a and b) and HSF1-null mice (c and d). B) Numbers of apoptotic cells were counted in 200 tubules in wild-type (n = 6) and HSF1-null (n = 6) testes 7 days after the induction of cryptorchidism. Means and SDs of numbers of TUNEL-positive cells per tubule in wild-type (21.5 ± 9.6) and HSF1-null (2.7 ± 4.5) mice are shown. C) Gel shift assay was performed using whole-cell extracts isolated from two testes in control (c) and cryptorchid mice. Testes were dissected at the indicated times after the surgical induction of cryptorchidism. Complexes containing HSF1 and a heat-shock-element probe are indicated; ns and free indicate nonspecific-binding and free probe, respectively. Magnification x100 (A) and x1000 (insets in A)

Magnitude of Cell Death of Spermatocytes Depends on the Activity of HSF1

To address the gene-dosage effect of HSF1, transgenic mice were crossed with HSF1-null mice. The weights of the testes in the transgenic mice were low (33.0 ± 4.8 mg) compared with those in the wild-type mice (71.3 ± 5.1 mg) [22]. As expected, the weight of the testes was partially restored in the transgenic mice lacking an endogenous HSF1 (48.8 ± 0.3 mg) (Fig. 5B). Histological examination also showed partial restoration of spermatogenesis in the transgenic mice lacking an endogenous HSF1 (Fig. 5C). The diameters of the seminiferous tubules were larger in the transgenic mice lacking an endogenous HSF1 compared to those in the transgenic mice expressing an endogenous HSF1. In the transgenic mice, many pachytene spermatocytes and only a few spermatids were observed in the tubules (Fig. 5C, b and h) [22]. Many of the spermatids were TUNEL-positive (Fig. 5C, e). In contrast, in the transgenic mice lacking an endogenous HSF1, many round spermatids were observed in most seminiferous tubules, and many of the spermatids were TUNEL-positive (Fig. 5C, c, f, and i). These results demonstrate the gene-dosage effect of HSF1 on spermatogenesis and that HSF1 promotes cell death of round spermatids in addition to pachytene spermatocytes.



View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Impaired spermatogenesis in the transgenic mice expressing an active HSF1 is partially rescued in the transgenic mice lacking an endogenous HSF1. A) Western blot analysis using anti-HSF1 antibody. An endogenous HSF1 (70 kDa) and an ectopically expressed, active form of HSF1 (54 kDa) are indicated. An asterisk indicates a nonspecific band. Wild-type mice (wt), transgenic mice expressing an active HSF1 (+/+, Tg(+)), and transgenic mice lacking an endogenous HSF1 (-/-, Tg(+)) are shown. B) Testicular weights of 6-wk-old male mice (n = 4) with each indicated genotype. C) Histological analysis of the testes in wild-type mice (a, d, and g), transgenic mice (b, e, and h), and transgenic mice lacking an endogenous HSF1 (c, f, and i). Paraffin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (ac), stained for apoptotic cells by the TUNEL method (df), or stained with periodic acid-Schiff and counterstained with methyl green (gi). Spermatids were TUNEL-positive in f. Acrosomes were stained in g and i but not in h. Magnification x200 (C, af), x1000 (C, insets in e and f) and x400 (C, gi)


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The roles of HSF1 have been revealed to be quite unique in male germ cells. The HSF1 does not activate heat shock genes in these cells in response to heat shock. Instead, HSF1 promotes an apoptotic cell death of pachytene spermatocytes exposed to thermal stress. It also acts as a cell-survival factor of more immature germ cells, probably including spermatogonia, without the activation of heat shock genes. Thus, HSF1 has two opposite roles in male germ cells. Because the decision between life and death of cells depends on the balance of survival signals and death signals, HSF1-mediated death signals may dominate HSF1-mediated survival signals in pachytene spermatocytes, and the HSF1-mediated survival signals may dominate the death signals in undifferentiated germ cells.

The HSF1 is activated in response to stresses that induce protein denaturation [14, 15]. The roles of HSF1 in male germ cells may be analogous to a transcription factor, p53, that is activated by genotoxic stresses. In response to the genotoxic stresses, p53 induces cell-cycle arrest to allow the opportunity for DNA repair to occur before replication or mitosis. Alternatively, it induces apoptotic cell death to eliminate irreparably damaged cells (for review, see [32, 33]). The choice between growth arrest and apoptosis is determined by many factors, including the cell type. For example, T lymphocytes undergo extensive apoptosis in response to DNA damage, whereas fibroblasts enter cell-cycle arrest (for review, see [34]). The p53 is expressed in male germ cells [35], and cell death of p53-deficient germ cells is delayed in experimental cryptorchidism [9], suggesting that the p53 pathway is involved in germ cell apoptosis in response to thermal stress. Thus, in germ cells, HSF1 and p53 monitor abnormalities of protein and of DNA, respectively. The present study establishes the notion that the HSF1 pathway is one of the quality-control mechanisms in spermatogenesis.

The expression of most heat shock proteins, including testis-specific isoforms, is generally high, but controversy exists regarding whether heat shock genes are activated in germ cells in response to heat shock (for review, see [36]). The Hsp70 protein was first reported to be induced in response to heat shock in isolated germ cells [37]. This result was confirmed by immunohistochemical and DNA microarray analyses using heat-treated testes [38]. In contrast, Hsp70 protein was reported not to be induced by in vitro heat shock in isolated pachytene spermatocytes [39]. Consistent with this result, ß-galactosidase activity was not induced by in vivo heat shock in spermatocytes of transgenic mice in which the Hsp70 genes were replaced by a ß-galactosidase gene [40]. In the present study, we clearly showed that heat shock genes were not activated in male germ cells and that protein level of Hsp70 was not induced. The activation of HSF1 is not accompanied with the increased expression of heat shock proteins in male germ cells. These results demonstrate that HSF1 determines the fate of germ cells independent of the expression of heat shock proteins.

Recently, we demonstrated that HSF1 protects against cell death caused by a single exposure to heat. This function is independent of the activation of heat shock genes [21]. In avians, HSF1 does not have the ability to activate heat shock genes under heat shock conditions, whereas an avian-specific factor, HSF3, activates heat shock genes. The induction of heat shock proteins through HSF3, as well as Drosophila HSF or mammalian HSF1 [17, 18], is necessary for induced thermotolerance in chicken B lymphocyte DT40 cells [19]. In contrast, the induction of heat shock proteins does not inhibit cell death of DT40 cells subjected to a single exposure of heat [21]. Rather, HSF1 strongly suppresses cell death of DT40 cells in the absence of heat shock gene activation. Increased cell death of HSF1-null DT40 cells at high temperatures is restored by ectopically expressing human HSF1 [21]. In the present study, we found a similar function of HSF1 in vivo in immature germ cells, probably including spermatogonia. Spermatogonia are stem cells of sperm, and they undergo mitotic cell division like somatic cells do. Taken together, HSF1 supports cell survival through the activation not only of heat shock genes but also of unknown target genes.

Embryonic weight was reduced when normal female mice were mated with males exposed to thermal stress [41]. This result suggests that embryo quality is linked to sperm quality and that injury caused by thermal stress is passed on to the next generation. Therefore, HSF1 should actively eliminate injured spermatocytes, which are committed to differentiate to sperm. On the other hand, HSF1 supports the survival of undifferentiated germ cells. These two functions of HSF1 might have played major roles in maintaining species during evolution against various stresses causing protein denaturation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank K. Toshimori and S. Ishii for discussion and K. Shinoda, T. Murata, K. Yamaguchi, and K. Sugahara for technical support.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research and on Priority Areas "Life of Protein" and "Cancer" from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan; Naitoh Foundation; and Yamaguchi University Foundation. Back

2 Correspondence: Akira Nakai, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Minami-Kogushi 1-1-1, Ube 755-8505, Japan. FAX: 81 836 22 2315; anakai{at}yamaguchi-u.ac.jp Back

Received: 5 June 2003.

First decision: 7 July 2003.

Accepted: 18 August 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Allen DJ, Harmon BV, Kerr JFR. In: Potten CS (ed.), Cell Death in Spermatogenesis. London: Oxford University Press; 1987:229–258
  2. Print CG, Loveland KL. Germ cell suicide: new insights into apoptosis during spermatogenesis. Bioessays 2000 22:423-430[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Huckins C. The morphology and kinetics of spermatogonial degeneration in normal adult rats: an analysis using a simplified classification of the germinal epithelium. Anat Rec 1978 190:905-926[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Crew FAE. A suggestion as to the cause of the aspermatic condition of the imperfectly descended testis. J Anat 1922 56:98-106[Medline]
  5. Moore CR. Properties of the gonads as controllers of somatic and psychical characteristics. Am J Anat 1924 34:269-316[CrossRef]
  6. Moore CR. 1951. Experimental studies on the male reproductive system. J Urol 1951 65:497-506
  7. Miura M, Sasagawa I, Suzuki Y, Nakada T, Fujii J. Apoptosis and expression of apoptosis-related genes in the mouse testis following heat exposure. Fertil Steril 2002 77:787-793[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Nair R, Shaha C. Diethylstilbestrol induces rat spermatogenic cell apoptosis in vivo through increased expression of spermatogenic cell Fas/FasL system. J Biol Chem 2002 278:6470-6481
  9. Yin Y, Stahl BC, DeWolf WC, Morgentaler A. p53-Mediated germ cell quality control in spermatogenesis. Dev Biol 1998 204:165-171[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Yin Y, Stahl BC, DeWolf WC, Morgentaler A. p53 and Fas are sequential mechanisms of testicular germ cell apoptosis. J Androl 2002 23:64-70[Abstract]
  11. Lindquist S. The heat-shock response. Ann Rev Biochem 1986 55:1151-1191[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Hartl FU. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 1996 381:571-579[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Glover JR, Lindquist S. Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40: a novel chaperone system that rescues previously aggregated proteins. Cell 1998 94:73-82[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Wu C. Heat shock transcription factors: structure and regulation. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1995 11:441-469[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Morimoto RI. Regulation of the heat shock transcriptional response: cross-talk between a family of heat shock factors, molecular chaperones, and negative regulators. Genes Dev 1998 12:3788-3796[Free Full Text]
  16. Nakai A. New aspect in the vertebrate heat shock factor system: HSF3 and HSF4. Cell Stress Chaperone 1999 4:86-93[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Jedlicka P, Mortin MA, Wu C. Multiple functions of Drosophila heat shock transcription factor in vivo. EMBO J 1997 16:2452-2462[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. McMillan DR, Xiao X, Shao L, Graves K, Benjamin IJ. Targeted disruption of heat shock transcription factor 1 abolishes thermotolerance and protection against heat-inducible apoptosis. J Biol Chem 1998 273:7523-7528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Tanabe M, Kawazoe Y, Takeda S, Morimoto RI, Nagata K, Nakai A. Disruption of the HSF3 gene results in the severe reduction of heat shock gene expression and loss of thermotolerance. EMBO J 1998 17:1750-1758[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Nakai A, Ishikawa T. Cell cycle transition under stress conditions controlled by vertebrate heat shock factors. EMBO J 2001 20:2885-2895[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Inouye S, Katsuki K, Izu H, Fujimoto M, Sugahara K, Yamada S, Shinkai Y, Oka Y, Katoh Y, Nakai A. Activation of heat shock genes is not necessary for heat shock transcription factor 1 to protect cell death against a single exposure to high temperatures. Mol Cell Biol 2003 23:5882-5895[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Nakai A, Suzuki M, Tanabe M. Arrest of spermatogenesis in mice expressing an active heat shock transcription factor 1. EMBO J 2000 19:1545-1554[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Cooper LF, Uoshima K. Differential estrogenic regulation of small Mr heat shock protein expression in osteoblasts. J Biol Chem 1994 269:7869-7873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Shikone T, Billig H, Hsueh AJW. Experimentally induced cryptorchidism increases apoptosis in rat testis. Biol Reprod 1994 51:865-872[Abstract]
  25. Ohsako S, Bunick D, Hayashi Y. Immunocytochemical observation of the 90 KD heat shock protein (HSP90): high expression in primordial and pre-meiotic germ cells of male and female rat gonads. J Histochem Cytochem 1995 43:67-76[Abstract]
  26. Dix DJ, Allen JW, Collins BW, Mori C, Nakamura N, Poorman-Allen P, Goulding EH, Eddy EM. Targeted gene disruption of Hsp70-2 results in failed meiosis, germ cell apoptosis, and male infertility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996 93:3264-3268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Steinberger E, Dixon WJ. Some observations on the effect of heat on the testicular germinal epithelium. Fertil Steril 1959 10:578-595
  28. Chowdhury AK, Steinberger E. Early changes in the germinal epithelium of rat testes following exposure to heat. J Reprod Fertil 1970 22:205-212[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Lue YH, Hikim AP, Swerdloff RS, Im P, Taing KS, Bui T, Leung A, Wang C. Single exposure to heat induces stage-specific germ cell apoptosis in rats: role of intratesticular testosterone on stage specificity. Endocrinology 1999 140:1709-1717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Clegg EJ. Studies on artificial cryptorchidism: degenerative and regenerative changes in the germinal epithelium of the rat testis. J Endocrinol 1963 27:241-251
  31. Niemi M, Kormano M. Response of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium of the rat testis to artificial cryptorchidism. Fertil Steril 1965 16:236-242[Medline]
  32. Amundson SA, Myers TG Jr, Fornace AJ. Roles for p53 in growth arrest and apoptosis: putting on the brakes after genotoxic stress. Oncogene 1998 17:3287-3299[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Sionov RV, Haupt Y. The cellular response to p53: the decision between life and death. Oncogene 1999 18:6145-6157[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Bates S, Vousden KH. Mechanisms of p53-mediated apoptosis. Cell Mol Life Sci 1999 55:28-37[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Schwartz D, Goldfinger N, Rotter V. Expression of p53 protein in spermatogenesis is confined to the tetraploid pachytene primary spermatocytes. Oncogene 1993 8:1487-1494[Medline]
  36. Sarge KD, Cullen KE. Regulation of hsp expression during rodent spermatogenesis. Cell Mol Life Sci 1997 53:191-197[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Allen RL, O'Brien DA, Jones CC, Rockett DL, Eddy EM. Expression of heat shock proteins by isolated mouse spermatogenic cells. Mol Cell Biol 1988 8:3260-3266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Rockett JC, Mapp FL, Garges JB, Luft JC, Mori C, Dix DJ. Effects of hyperthermia on spermatogenesis, apoptosis, gene expression, and fertility in adult male mice. Biol Reprod 2001 65:229-239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Zakeri ZF, Welch WJ, Wolgemuth DJ. Characterization and inducibility of hsp 70 proteins in the male mouse germ line. J Cell Biol 1990 5:1785-1792
  40. Huang L, Mivechi NF, Moskophidis D. Insights into regulation and function of the major stress-induced hsp70 molecular chaperone in vivo: analysis of mice with targeted gene disruption of the hsp70.1 or hsp70.3 gene. Mol Cell Biol 2001 21:8575-8591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Jannes P, Spiessens C, Van der Auwera I, D'Hooghe T, Verhoeven G, Vanderschueren D. Male subfertility induced by acute scrotal heating affects embryo quality in normal female mice. Hum Reprod 1998 13:372-375



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. A. Salmand, T. Jungas, M. Fernandez, A. Conter, and E. S. Christians
Mouse Heat-Shock Factor 1 (HSF1) Is Involved in Testicular Response to Genotoxic Stress Induced by Doxorubicin
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2008; 79(6): 1092 - 1101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Takaki, M. Fujimoto, T. Nakahari, S. Yonemura, Y. Miyata, N. Hayashida, K. Yamamoto, R. B. Vallee, T. Mikuriya, K. Sugahara, et al.
Heat Shock Transcription Factor 1 Is Required for Maintenance of Ciliary Beating in Mice
J. Biol. Chem., December 21, 2007; 282(51): 37285 - 37292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
W. Widlak, N. Vydra, E. Malusecka, V. Dudaladava, B. Winiarski, D. Scieglinska, and P. Widlak
Heat shock transcription factor 1 down-regulates spermatocyte-specific 70 kDa heat shock protein expression prior to the induction of apoptosis in mouse testes
Genes Cells, April 1, 2007; 12(4): 487 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. Shabtay and Z. Arad
Reciprocal activation of HSF1 and HSF3 in brain and blood tissues: is redundancy developmentally related?
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): R566 - R572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Takaki, M. Fujimoto, K. Sugahara, T. Nakahari, S. Yonemura, Y. Tanaka, N. Hayashida, S. Inouye, T. Takemoto, H. Yamashita, et al.
Maintenance of Olfactory Neurogenesis Requires HSF1, a Major Heat Shock Transcription Factor in Mice
J. Biol. Chem., February 24, 2006; 281(8): 4931 - 4937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. Shabtay and Z. Arad
Ectothermy and endothermy: evolutionary perspectives of thermoprotection by HSPs
J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2005; 208(14): 2773 - 2781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Inouye, H. Izu, E. Takaki, H. Suzuki, M. Shirai, Y. Yokota, H. Ichikawa, M. Fujimoto, and A. Nakai
Impaired IgG Production in Mice Deficient for Heat Shock Transcription Factor 1
J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 2004; 279(37): 38701 - 38709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/1/18    most recent
biolreprod.103.020065v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Izu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakai, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Izu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakai, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Izu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakai, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS