Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print May 14, 2003.
Biol Reprod 2003, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.010827
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
69/3/809    most recent
biolreprod.102.010827v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gwathmey, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Suarez, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gwathmey, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Suarez, S. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gwathmey, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Suarez, S. S.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 69, 809–815 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.010827
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Female Reproductive Tract

PDC-109 (BSP-A1/A2) Promotes Bull Sperm Binding to Oviductal Epithelium In Vitro and May Be Involved in Forming the Oviductal Sperm Reservoir1

TanYa M. Gwathmey, George G. Ignotz, and Susan S. Suarez2

Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Sperm reservoirs have been found in the oviducts of several species of mammals. In cattle, the reservoir is formed by the binding of sperm to fucose-containing glycoconjugates on the surface of oviductal epithelial cells. A fucose-binding molecule was purified from sperm extracts and identified as PDC-109 (BSP-A1/A2), a protein that is secreted by the seminal vesicles and associates with the plasma membrane of sperm upon ejaculation. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that PDC-109 promotes bull sperm binding to oviductal epithelium. PDC-109 was purified from bovine seminal plasma, and polyclonal antibodies were produced in rabbits. The antibodies detected PDC-109 on ejaculated sperm by indirect immunofluorescence and Western blots of extracts, but PDC-109 was not detected on epididymal sperm. When added to epididymal sperm, purified PDC-109 was absorbed onto the plasma membrane overlying the acrosome, as demonstrated by indirect immunofluorescence and by labeling sperm directly with fluorescein-conjugated PDC-109. When added to explants of oviductal epithelium, significantly fewer epididymal sperm than ejaculated sperm became bound. Addition of PDC-109 to epididymal sperm increased epithelial binding to the level observed for ejaculated sperm. In addition, binding of ejaculated sperm to oviductal epithelium was inhibited by addition of excess soluble PDC-109. Ejaculated sperm lost the ability to bind to oviductal epithelium after heparin-induced capacitation, but treatment with PDC-109 restored binding. These results demonstrate that PDC-109 enables sperm to bind to oviductal epithelium and plays a major role in formation of the bovine oviductal sperm reservoir.

epididymis, female reproductive tract, oviduct, seminal vesicles, sperm


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Sperm deposited in the female reproductive tract of many mammals are trapped in the initial segment of the oviduct by binding to epithelial cells, thereby forming a sperm reservoir [13]. Evidence indicates that the reservoir serves to maintain the fertility of sperm until ovulation by regulating capacitation [4] and to prevent polyspermy by allowing only a small number of sperm to reach each oocyte as it enters the ampulla [5, 6].

In four species studied to date (hamsters [7], horses [8], cattle [9, 10], and pigs [11, 12]), binding of sperm to oviductal epithelium was found to be carbohydrate mediated in a species-specific manner. For example, binding of hamster sperm to its homologous oviductal epithelium is mediated by sialic acid [7], whereas binding of stallion sperm is mediated by galactose [8]. In cattle, there is a protein on sperm that recognizes and binds a fucosylated ligand on the oviductal epithelium [9, 10]. Recently, Green et al. [11] demonstrated that the binding of boar sperm to oviductal epithelium was competitively inhibited by maltose, lactose, and mannose.

Suarez [13] postulated that substances secreted into the oviduct fluid just prior to ovulation promote sperm release by stimulating capacitation and hyperactivation. Capacitated sperm lose binding affinity for oviductal epithelium [14, 15]; therefore, alterations in the plasma membrane associated with capacitation may result in a loss or modification of the carbohydrate-binding protein responsible for binding sperm to the epithelium. Bull sperm lose affinity for fucose after capacitation in vitro [16, 17]. Hyperactivation may play a role in enabling sperm to detach from oviductal epithelium as they lose binding affinity. DeMott and Suarez [18] observed that only hyperactivated mouse sperm pulled off of the wall of the oviduct.

We isolated a fucose-binding protein from bull sperm using affinity chromatography and identified it as PDC-109 (rotein with N-terminus aspartic acid, , and carboxy terminus ystine, having amino acids), based on amino acid sequencing [17]. PDC-109 is one of three major heparin-binding acidic proteins in bovine seminal plasma: bovine seminal protein (BSP)-A1/A2 (PDC-109), BSP-A3, and BSP 30 [19]. PDC-109 is a mixture of BSP-A1 and BSP-A2, which differ only in glycosylation [20]. All are secreted by seminal vesicles. At a seminal plasma concentration of 15–20 mg/ml, PDC-109 is the most abundant of the BSPs [21].

Upon ejaculation, PDC-109 associates with epididymal sperm by binding to choline phospholipids [2225], specifically those in the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane [26]. Anti-PDC-109 antibody labels fixed ejaculated sperm over the head and sometimes the midpiece [27]. Incubation of sperm with bovine follicular fluid and high-density lipoproteins to capacitate them resulted in a loss of PDC-109, as detected by Western blots [28].

Because sperm do not acquire PDC-109 until ejaculation, we undertook this study to determine whether bovine epididymal sperm can bind to oviductal epithelium and if not whether seminal plasma PDC-109 enables them to do so. We also tested seminal plasma PDC-109 to determine whether it could restore the ability of capacitated sperm to bind to oviductal epithelium.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Medium and Chemicals

Routine laboratory chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise stated.

A modified Tyrode balanced salt solution, Tyrode albumin lactate pyruvate (TALP), was used for semen dilution, sperm incubation, and oviductal explant preparation and incubation. TALP consisted of 99 mM NaCl, 3.1 mM KCl, 25 mM NaHCO3, 0.39 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Hepes, 2 mM CaCl2, 1.1 mM MgCl2, 25.4 mM sodium lactate, 0.11 mg/ml sodium pyruvate, 6 mg/ml BSA (Fraction V; Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA), and 5 µg/ml gentamycin (pH 7.4, 290 mOsm).

Hepes balanced salts (HBS) solution was prepared by adding 25 mM Hepes to 130 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.36 mM NaH2PO4, 0.49 mM MgCl2, and 2.4 mM CaCl2 (pH 7.4, 290 mOsm).

Isolation and Purification of PDC-109 (BSP-A1/A2)

Semen collected from bulls at Genex/CRI (Ithaca, NY) was transported to the laboratory and supplemented with a serine and cysteine protease inhibitor cocktail used at the manufacturer's recommended concentrations (Complete EDTA-free; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). Seminal plasma was obtained by centrifugation (3000 x g for 15 min) and filtration (0.2-µm cellulose acetate) to remove sperm and particulate debris, assayed for protein content using the DC Protein Assay Kit (BioRad, Hercules, CA), and stored at -20°C.

PDC-109 was isolated from seminal plasma according to the method of Gasset et al. [24]. Aliquots of seminal plasma containing 50–100 mg protein were applied to heparin-Sepharose CL-4B columns (1 x 20 cm) equilibrated with binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.4). Following binding and extensive washing, heparin-binding proteins were eluted with binding buffer containing 10 mM o-phosphorylcholine. Eluates were concentrated, dialyzed against 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.5) in 1 M NaCl, and applied to diethylaminoethyl-Sephadex equilibrated with the same buffer. Binding and washing were followed by elution of PDC-109 with 10 mM o-phosphorylcholine in column buffer. Eluate fractions were pooled, concentrated, and dialyzed against PBS, water, or HBS, depending upon subsequent applications. Purity of PDC-109 was assessed by SDS-PAGE with silver staining [29].

Purified BSP-A3 was obtained from Dr. Puttaswamy Manjunath (University of Montreal and Guy Bernier Research Center, Montreal, PQ, Canada).

Antibody Production

Two Flemish Giant Chinchilla-cross rabbits were injected subcutaneously with 100 µg PDC-109 in Freund complete adjuvant immediately after blood was collected to obtain preimmune serum. Second and third injections (150 µg and 50 µg, respectively) were administered in incomplete adjuvant, as were final boosts (150 µg) 14 days prior to collection of the last blood sample [30]. Antibody titers were determined by ELISA using PDC-109-coated plates and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG. The IgG fraction of immune serum was purified by protein A-affinity chromatography (Immunopure Plus (A); Pierce, Rockford, IL) following the manufacturer's protocol. Specificity and cross-reactivity of antibodies were determined by Western blotting with purified PDC-109, BSP-A3, and unfractionated seminal plasma. Serum and purified IgG were stored as aliquots at -80°C until needed.

Rabbit polyclonal antiserum against BSP-A3 was kindly provided by Dr. Puttaswamy Manjunath [31].

Gel Electrophoresis and Western Blotting

SDS-PAGE of seminal plasma, sperm extracts, PDC-109, and BSP-A3 was performed according to the method of Laemmli [32]. For extraction, both ejaculated and epididymal sperm were washed three times by 10-fold dilution with protein-free HBS (10 min at 170 x g) and then treated with 1.5% SDS for 30 min at room temperature. Sperm were removed by centrifugation at 13 000 x g for 15 min, and proteins were recovered from supernatants by precipitation with 10% trichloroacetic acid on ice for 30 min. Precipitates were washed with ethanol, air dried, solubilized in 1.5% SDS, and assayed for protein content (DC Protein Assay Kit). Gels were stained with silver nitrate [29] or electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes [33]. Immunodetection was performed on blots blocked for 3 h with 3% BSA in PBS. Blots were probed for 2 h with anti-PDC-109 IgG (1 µg/ml) or with anti-BSP-A3 antiserum (1:5000) in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween-20, washed, and incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200) for 1 h. Reactive proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Super Signal; Pierce), and images were recorded on radiographic film.

Preparation of Epididymal Sperm

Testes with attached epididymides and vasa deferentia were obtained from an abattoir (Taylor Packing Co., Wyalusing, PA) and transported to the laboratory on ice. The vas deferens was dissected free of connective tissue and uncoiled. A blunt 25-ga needle was inserted into the lumen, and approximately 5 ml of TALP was infused into the vas deferens and caudal epididymis. A cut was made in the cauda, and epididymal sperm were flushed into a 15-ml polypropylene tube, washed twice by centrifugation in 5 ml TALP for 10 min (170 x g), and resuspended in TALP at 5 x 106 cells/ml. Only samples with motility >85% were used.

Preparation of Ejaculated Sperm

Bull semen was provided by Genex/CRI, was diluted 5-fold in TALP immediately after collection, and was transported to the laboratory in a 37°C warm water jacket. Within 60 min of collection, sperm were washed thrice in 5 ml TALP (170 x g for 10 min), resuspended in TALP at 5 x 106 cells/ml, and incubated at 39°C and 5% CO2 in water-saturated air until assayed. Only samples with motility >85% were used.

Immunofluorescent Labeling of Sperm

Ejaculated or epididymal sperm were prepared as described above. Sperm treated with PDC-109 were washed twice by centrifugation through warmed BSA-free TALP and then fixed with 1% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. Sperm were diluted 20-fold in 0.2 M glycine to stop fixation and then pelleted by centrifugation. Sperm were resuspended in PBS, air dried onto slides, and blocked with 3% (w/v) BSA in PBS. Ejaculated sperm were first incubated with an anti-PDC-109 primary antibody or with preimmune serum (control), followed by a fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody. Epididymal sperm were stained directly with fluorescein-conjugated anti-PDC-109 antibody.

Preparation of Oviductal Explants

Bovine oviducts were collected at an abattoir (Taylor Packing) and transported to the laboratory in PBS containing 6 mM penicillin and 5 mM streptomycin in containers on ice. Oviducts taken from cows in various cycle stages were used, because stage had no effect on sperm binding in previous studies [1]. Oviducts from four cows were pooled for each replicate. Explants of oviductal epithelium were prepared as described previously [9, 16]. The isthmic portion of the oviduct was dissected free of connective tissue and rinsed in PBS. The epithelium was extruded in sheets by squeezing the oviduct with fine tweezers, fragmented by pipeting, centrifuged for 1 min (170 x g), transferred to TALP, and allowed a minimum of 30 min incubation at 39°C and 5% CO2 to form everted vesicles with apical ciliated surfaces oriented outwardly. Explants were used within 6 h of slaughter.

Sperm-Binding Assays

Oviductal explants were centrifuged (170 x g for 1 min in 5 ml TALP), and 10 µl of the pellet was added to 50 µl TALP. Ejaculated or epididymal sperm (5 x 106/ml) were then added in 20-µl aliquots. After a 15-min incubation at 39°C in 5% CO2, loosely bound sperm were removed from explants by pipetting through three 75-µl droplets of TALP. The explants were transferred to a 35- x 10-mm Petri dish and covered with prewarmed silicon oil to prevent dehydration during observation.

Explants were videotaped on a 39°C microscope stage using a Zeiss Axiovert Microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornbrook, NY). Videotaping was performed using a Dage CCD-72 black-and-white video camera (Dage-MTI, Michigan City, IN) in combination with a Panasonic AG-7300 Super-VHS videocassette recorder (Panasonic Industrial Co., Secaucus, NJ) and a time/date recorder (For-A Corporation of America, Los Angeles, CA). At least eight microscope fields of each treatment group were recorded and assessed for sperm-binding density.

Determination of Binding Density

To determine the density of sperm bound to explants, the video recordings were reviewed to count the number of sperm bound to each explant. A video image of each explant was digitized using a Power Macintosh 7100/Av (Apple Computers, Cupertino, CA), and the surface area was determined by employing National Institutes of Health Image (internet-based freeware at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/). The binding density was calculated by determining the number of sperm bound per 0.1 mm2 of explant surface. Approximately 12.3 x 104 ± 2.0 x 104 mm2 (mean ± SD) of explant surface were analyzed per treatment for each experiment performed.

Binding of Epididymal Sperm

Epididymal sperm were treated with either 250 µg/ml PDC-109 or TALP diluent (with 6 mg/ml BSA) for 20 min at 39°C and then washed by centrifugation for 12 min (100 x g) to remove unbound PDC-109. The sperm pellet was resuspended in TALP to a concentration of 5 x 106 cells/ml and added to explants. Ejaculated sperm were used as a positive control for sperm binding. As described above, sperm/explant complexes were transferred through three TALP droplets to remove loosely bound sperm and then placed under silicon oil for video recording. The experiment was repeated four times, each time using sperm from a different bull and explants pooled from four cows.

Competitive Inhibition of Ejaculated Sperm Binding

To determine whether excess unbound PDC-109 could competitively inhibit sperm binding to epithelium, washed ejaculated sperm were added to oviductal explants that had been pre-treated for 20 min with 100 µl of varying concentrations of PDC-109 (250 µg/ml, 125 µg/ml, 62.5 µg/ml, or buffer alone). Density of bound sperm was determined as described above. The experiment was repeated three times, each time using sperm from a different bull and explants pooled from four cows.

Restoring Binding in Capacitated Sperm

To demonstrate that PDC-109 could restore the binding of capacitated sperm to explants, sperm were capacitated in TALP + 10 µg/ml heparin at 39°C for 4 h [34]. Uncapacitated controls were incubated for 4 h in TALP without heparin. Because heparin agglutinates sperm, 20 µg/ml protamine sulfate was added at the end of the incubation to deagglutinate the sperm. Sperm were washed by microcentrifugation (100 x g for 15 min) to remove heparin and protamine sulfate, resuspended in TALP, incubated with 240 µg/ml PDC-109 or TALP diluent for 20 min, washed in TALP to remove unbound PDC-109, and tested for their capacity to bind to explants. BSA was present at 6 mg/ml in all treatments. The experiment was repeated three times, each time using sperm from a different bull and explants pooled from four cows.

Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by a Tukey honestly significant difference pairwise comparison test. Dose dependence was analyzed using linear regression. Software used was Minitab (State College, PA).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Purified PDC-109 appeared in gels as a doublet, representing the glycosylated and nonglycosylated forms [19, 20] (Fig. 1). The purity of PDC-109 was confirmed by testing its cross-reactivity with antibodies raised against BSP-A3, which is closely related to PDC-109 in size and amino acid sequence [35] (Fig. 1C, lane 3). Anti-BSP-A3 did bind to a few other heparin-binding proteins obtained in the first purification step for PDC-109 (Fig. 1C, lane 5); however, it did not recognize our purified PDC-109. Anti-PDC-109 developed for these experiments did not cross-react with BSP-A3 (Fig. 1B, lane 4), indicating the purity of the PDC-109 preparation and the specificity of the anti-PDC-109. Indirect immunofluorescent labeling of fixed ejaculated sperm with anti-PDC-109 antiserum revealed labeling over the acrosomal region of the sperm head (Fig. 2A), which is the region known to bind to oviductal epithelium, whereas sperm incubated with preimmune serum were not labeled (Fig. 2C).



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. SDS-PAGE and Western blots of sperm extracts, seminal plasma fractions, PDC-109, and BSP-A3. Lane 1: SDS extract of washed ejaculated sperm; lane 2: SDS extract of washed epididymal sperm; lane 3: PDC-109; lane 4: BSP-A3; lane 5: heparin-binding fraction of seminal plasma; lane 6: whole seminal plasma. A) Silver-stained gel. B) Western blot of same samples probed with anti-PDC-109. D) Identical blot probed with anti-BSP-A3



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Indirect immunofluorescent labeling of ejaculated sperm. A) Anti-PDC-109 antiserum diluted 1:1000. Arrows show labeling of acrosomal region. Bar = 10 µm. B) Inverted image of A. C) Preimmune serum diluted 1:50. D) Inverted image of C, enhanced to show all sperm

Because PDC-109 is secreted by the seminal vesicles, sperm should not be exposed to it until they come in contact with seminal plasma. Accordingly, anti-PDC-109 did not label any proteins extracted from epididymal sperm (Fig. 1B, lane 2) nor did it label fixed epididymal sperm (Fig. 3A). However, following treatment with 250 µg/ml PDC-109, epididymal sperm were labeled brightly over the acrosomal region (Fig. 3C).



View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Epididymal sperm absorbed PDC-109 over the acrosome of the head, as shown using anti-PDC-109. A) Epididymal sperm without PDC-109 showed no antibody label. Bar = 10 µm . B) Brightfield image of A. C) Epididymal sperm treated with PDC-109 labeled with antibody over the acrosome (arrows). D) Brightfield of C

Anti-PDC-109 antibody would not label live sperm. To demonstrate that PDC-109 binds to the external surface of the plasma membrane, we conjugated fluorescein directly to PDC-109. When added to epididymal sperm, the labeled PDC-109 bound to the plasma membrane overlying the acrosome (Fig. 4), thereby demonstrating its surface localization and availability to bind sperm to oviduct.



View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. A) FITC-conjugated PDC-109 labels plasma membrane of living epididymal sperm over the acrosomal region. B) Inverted image indicating acrosomal region (a), postacrosomal region (p), moving flagellum (f). These sperm eventually detached from the coverslip and swam away

We next evaluated whether epididymal sperm would bind to oviductal explants. As anticipated, the binding density of epididymal sperm was significantly lower than that of ejaculated sperm. When epididymal sperm were pretreated with 250 µg/ml PDC-109 and then washed to remove unbound protein, sperm-binding density was increased to the level observed in ejaculated sperm, indicating that PDC-109 conferred on epididymal sperm the ability to bind explants (Fig. 5). Furthermore, ejaculated sperm were prevented from binding by the addition of excess soluble PDC-109 to the wells containing explants, and the inhibition was dose dependent (Fig. 6).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. PDC-109 promotes epididymal sperm binding to oviductal explants. Few epididymal sperm (EPD) bound to explants; however, addition of PDC-109 (EPD + PDC) conferred on epididymal sperm the ability to bind explants to a degree comparable with that of washed ejaculated sperm (EJAC). Different letters denote significant differences among treatment groups (P < 0.01). Means ± SEM are shown for four replicates



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Dose-dependent inhibition of sperm binding to explants of oviductal epithelium by PDC-109 purified from seminal plasma. The regression of dose on density of sperm binding was significant (P < 0.01). Circles represent the mean ± SEM for three replicates

Because we had already established that capacitation diminishes the ability of bull sperm to bind to fucose and to oviductal epithelium [14], we examined changes in sperm PDC-109 content as a result of capacitation. Sperm incubated for 4 h in TALP containing 10 µg/ml of heparin to promote capacitation [34] showed a decrease in the amount of PDC-109 recovered from extracts (Fig. 7, lane 3) in comparison to sperm incubated for 4 h in TALP alone (Fig. 7, lane 1) or in TALP containing heparin and glucose (Fig. 7, lane 2), which is known to inhibit capacitation of bull sperm [36].



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Loss of PDC-109 during capacitation. Detergent extracts of 106 sperm were resolved by SDS-PAGE, blotted, and probed with anti-PDC-109. Lane 1: 4 h in TALP (control); lane 2: 4 h in TALP + heparin + glucose (noncapacitated); lane 3: 4 h in TALP + heparin (capacitated)

We next tested the ability of PDC-109 to restore binding of capacitated sperm to epithelium. Sperm incubated 4 h in TALP containing heparin and then washed to remove heparin bound to epithelium in significantly lower numbers than did sperm preincubated 4 h in TALP without heparin. When sperm capacitated by incubation in heparin were washed to remove heparin, treated with 240 µg/ml PDC-109, and then washed to remove unbound protein, binding was restored to the level of uncapacitated sperm (Fig. 8).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Addition of PDC-109 to capacitated (CAP) sperm restored binding to the level observed for noncapacitated sperm (NON-CAP). Different letters denote significant differences among treatment groups (P < 0.05). Means ± SEM are shown for three replicates


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our results demonstrate for the first time that seminal plasma PDC-109 promotes bull sperm binding to oviductal epithelium. Previously, we used an affinity chromatography column, with {alpha}-L-Fuc[1,4]-ß-D-Gal[1,3]-D-GlcNAc as the trap, to isolate a fucose-binding protein from extracts of ejaculated sperm [17]. The isolated protein blocked binding of ejaculated sperm to oviductal epithelium [17]. The identification of the isolated protein as PDC-109, a protein produced in the seminal vesicles and ductus deferens [35], prompted us to test whether epididymal sperm could bind to epithelium and, if not, whether PDC-109 derived from seminal plasma could enable them to bind.

Epididymal sperm lack PDC-109 [27]. Consequently, no labeling was observed for fixed epididymal sperm stained with fluorescein-conjugated anti-PDC-109 antibody. However, when sperm were treated with purified seminal plasma PDC-109 prior to fixation, they were labeled brightly over the acrosomal region. Live sperm were not labeled with anti-PDC-109, either as whole IgG or Fab fragment, possibly because the antigenic epitopes of PDC-109 are buried within the plasma membrane and thus inaccessible to the antibody in live sperm. Structural studies have indicated that the molecule is inserted into the outer leaflet of the lipid bilayer in an orientation parallel to the surface but with segments reaching down to the 14th carbon atom of the acyl chains of the membrane lipids [37]. To test whether our purified seminal plasma PDC-109 was exposed on the sperm surface so that it could bind to oviductal epithelium, we conjugated fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) directly to PDC-109 and added this conjugate to live epididymal sperm. The epididymal sperm were labeled intensely over the acrosomal region of the plasma membrane, which is the region where sperm bind to epithelium. Desnoyers and Manjunath [22] reported that anti-PDC-109 antibody labeled the region overlying the acrosome and the midpiece of air-dried sperm.

Very few epididymal bull sperm bound to the oviductal explants. However, addition of seminal plasma PDC-109 increased the number of epididymal sperm binding to the level of ejaculated sperm, which indicates that PDC-109 alone can enable sperm to bind to epithelium. However, a few epididymal sperm did bind to explants. We do not know whether this binding was spurious or represented a weak affinity of epididymal bull sperm for epithelium. Other researchers have reported the existence of an epididymal heparin-binding protein [38], although little is known about the protein at this time. Additional studies are needed to determine whether this epididymal protein plays a part in mediating oviductal sperm binding.

Epididymal hamster sperm can bind to conspecific oviductal epithelium and do so via carbohydrate recognition [7], but the identity of the carbohydrate-binding protein is not known and it may or may not be homologous to PDC-109. Under some circumstances, artificial insemination with bovine epididymal sperm can result in pregnancy [39]; however, it is not known whether the epididymal sperm in this instance formed a reservoir in the oviduct. The careful timing of artificial insemination may reduce the need for a reservoir. If reservoir formation is essential for fertilization, then some redundancy in binding proteins might be expected.

Addition of seminal plasma PDC-109 to explants prior to adding ejaculated sperm in a competitive binding inhibition assay significantly reduced binding of sperm in a dose-dependent manner. The reduction in sperm-binding density was comparable to that observed when using the protein purified from sperm extracts [17], confirming the identity of the oviduct-binding protein on sperm as PDC-109.

We have shown for the first time that PDC-109 can restore the ability of capacitated sperm to bind to epithelium. Capacitation decreases the ability of sperm to bind to oviductal epithelium [14] and to fucose [16]. PDC-109 is lost from sperm during capacitation in vitro by contact with follicular fluid containing high-density lipoprotein [28]. Our Western blot analysis also showed a decrease in the amount of PDC-109 on sperm incubated with heparin to capacitate them. Previously, we demonstrated that addition of PDC-109 purified from sperm extracts could restore the ability of capacitated bull sperm to bind fucose [17]. In this study, we demonstrated that seminal plasma PDC-109 can restore the ability of capacitated bull sperm to bind to oviductal epithelium. In vivo, loss of PDC-109 from sperm during capacitation could therefore account for release of sperm from the oviductal reservoir. The loss of PDC-109 could be initiated in vivo by an increase in heparinlike glycosaminoglycans in the oviduct [4042] or by follicular fluid entering the oviduct with the cumulus mass.

There is evidence that PDC-109 plays a role in sperm capacitation as well as in reservoir formation. PDC-109 promotes efflux of cholesterol from epididymal sperm [43] and enhances capacitation of epididymal sperm in vitro [28]. Promotion of cholesterol efflux may occur indirectly. PDC-109 appears to reduce the motion of cholesterol in membranes indirectly by forming strong associations with choline phospholipids [44]. Because capacitation is thought to be delayed until sperm are released from the reservoir [4, 13], it may seem contradictory that PDC-109 can participate in both sperm storage and capacitation. However, PDC-109 does not actually induce capacitation per se but rather enhances capacitation in the presence of high-density lipoproteins, such as those found in bovine follicular fluid [28, 45]. Thus, PDC-109 would not initiate capacitation until promoters became available in the oviduct.

We have demonstrated that bovine seminal plasma PDC-109 can bind epididymal sperm to oviductal epithelium and can restore epithelial binding ability to capacitated sperm.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Genex Cooperative for donating semen samples, Michael Kaproth, Michael Simkin, and Dr. John E. Parks for helping us obtain bovine tissue, and Katherine Granish for her assistance in analyzing experiments. We especially thank Dr. Puttaswamy Manjunath for his generous donation of BSP-A3 and anti-BSP-A3 antibody.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 This work was supported by U.S. Department of Agriculture NRICGP project number 40085 (S.S.S.) Back

2 Correspondence: S.S. Suarez, Department of Biomedical Sciences, T5-006 Veterinary Research Tower, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. FAX: 607 253 3541; sss7{at}cornell.edu Back

Received: 4 September 2002.

First decision: 9 October 2002.

Accepted: 30 April 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Lefebvre R, Chenoweth PJ, Drost M, LeClear CT, MacCubbin M, Dutton JT, Suarez SS. Characterization of the oviductal sperm reservoir in cattle. Biol Reprod 1995 53:1066-1074[Abstract]
  2. Suarez SS. Sperm transport and motility in the mouse oviduct: observations in situ. Biol Reprod 1987 36:203-210[Abstract]
  3. Smith TT, Yanagimachi R. Attachment and release of spermatozoa from the caudal isthmus of the hamster oviduct. J Reprod Fertil 1991 91:567-573[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Dobrinski I, Suarez SS, Ball BA. Intracellular calcium concentration in equine spermatozoa attached to oviductal epithelial cells in vitro. Biol Reprod. 1996 54:783-788
  5. Polge C, Salamon S, Wilmut L. Fertilizing capacity of frozen boar semen following surgical insemination. Vet Rec 1970 87:424-428[Medline]
  6. Hunter RHF, Leglise PC. Polyspermic fertilization following tubal surgery in pigs, with particular reference to the role of the isthmus. J Reprod Fertil 1971 24:233-246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. DeMott RP, Lefebvre R, Suarez SS. Carbohydrates mediate the adherence of hamster sperm to oviductal epithelium. Biol Reprod 1995 52:1395-1403[Abstract]
  8. Lefebvre R, DeMott RP, Suarez SS, Samper JC. Specific inhibition of equine sperm binding to oviductal epithelium. In: Sharp DC, Bazer FW (eds.), Equine Reproduction VI. Madison, WI: Society for the Study of Reproduction; 1995:689–696
  9. Lefebvre R, Lo M, Suarez SS. Bovine sperm binding to oviductal epithelium involves fucose recognition. Biol Reprod 1997 56:1198-1204[Abstract]
  10. Suarez SS, Revah I, Lo M, Kölle S. Bull sperm binding to oviductal epithelium is mediated by a Ca2+-dependent lectin on sperm that recognizes Lewis-a trisaccharide. Biol Reprod 1998 59:39-44[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Green CE, Bredl J, Holt WV, Watson PF, Fazeli A. Carbohydrate mediation of boar sperm binding to oviductal epithelial cells in vitro. Reproduction 2001 122:305-315[Abstract]
  12. Jansen S, Ekhlasi-Hundrieser M, Topfer-Petersen , Sperm adhesion molecules: structure and function. Cells Tissues Organs 2001 168:82-92[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Suarez SS. Formation of a reservoir of sperm in the oviduct. Reprod Domest Anim 2002 37:140-143[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Lefebvre R, Suarez SS. Effect of capacitation on bull sperm binding to homologous oviductal epithelium. Biol Reprod 1996 56:1198-1204
  15. Fazeli A, Duncan AE, Watson PF, Holt WV. Sperm-oviduct interaction: induction of capacitation of preferential binding of uncapacitated spermatozoa to oviductal cells in porcine species. Biol Reprod 1999 60:879-886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Revah I, Gadella BM, Flesch FM, Colenbrander B, Suarez SS. Physiological state of bull sperm affects fucose- and mannose-binding properties. Biol Reprod 2000 62:1010-1015[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ignotz GG, Lo MC, Perez CL, Gwathmey TM, Suarez SS. Characterization of a fucose-binding protein from bull sperm and seminal plasma that may be responsible for formation of the oviductal sperm reservoir. Biol Reprod 2001 64:1806-1811[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. DeMott RP, Suarez SS. Hyperactivated sperm progress in the mouse oviduct. Biol Reprod 1992 46:779-785[Abstract]
  19. Manjunath P, Sairam MR. Purification and biochemical characterization of thee major acidic proteins (BSP-A1, BSP-A2 and A-3) from bovine seminal plasma. Biochem J 1987 241:685-692[Medline]
  20. Gerwig GL, Calvete JJ, Topfer-Petersen E, Vliegenthart JF. The structure of the O-linked carbohydrate chain of bovine seminal plasma protein PDC-109 revised by H-NMR spectroscopy: a correction. FEBS Lett 1996 387:99-100[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Calvete JJ, Raida M, Sanz L, Wempe F, Scheit KH, Romero A, Topfer-Petersen E. Localization and structural characterization of an oligosaccharide O-linked to bovine PDC-109. Quantitation of the glycoprotein in seminal plasma and on the surface of ejaculated and capacitated sperm. FEBS Lett 1994 350:203-206[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Desnoyers L, Manjunath P. Major proteins of bovine seminal plasma exhibit novel interactions with phospholipids. J Biol Chem 1992 267:10149-10155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Manjunath P, Soubeyrand S, Chandonnet L, Roberts KD. Major proteins of bovine seminal plasma inhibit phospholipase A2. Biochem J 1994 303:121-128
  24. Gasset M, Saiz JL, Laynez J, Sanz L, Gentzel M, Topfer-Petersen E, Calvete JJ. Conformational features and thermal stability of bovine seminal plasma protein PDC-109 oligomers and phosphorylcholine-bound complexes. Eur J Biochem 1997 250:735-744[Medline]
  25. Muller P, Erlemann KR, Muller K, Calvete JJ, Topfer-Petersen E, Marienfeld K, Hermann A. Biochemical characterization of the bovine seminal plasma protein PDC-109 with phospholipid vesicles. Eur Biophys J 1998 27:33-41[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Greube A, Muller K, Topfer-Petersen E, Hermann A, Muller P. Influence of the bovine seminal plasma protein PDC-109 on the physical state of membranes. Biochemistry 2001 40:8326-8334[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Manjunath P, Chandonnet L, LeBlond E, Desnoyers L. Major proteins of bovine seminal vesicles bind to spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1993 50:27-37
  28. Thérien I, Bousquet D, Manjunath P. Effect of seminal phospholipid-binding proteins and follicular fluid on bovine sperm capacitation. Biol Reprod 2001 65:41-51[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Blum H, Beier H, Gross HJ. Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA, and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis 1987 8:93-99[CrossRef]
  30. Harlow E, Lane D. Immunization. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1988: 92–120
  31. Nauc V, Manjunath P. Radioimmunoassays for bull seminal plasma proteins (BSP-A1/-A2, BSP-A3, and BSP-30-kilodaltons), and their quantification in seminal plasma and sperm. Biol Reprod 2000 63:1058-1066[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970 227:680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Towbin H, Staihelin T, Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1979 76:4350-4354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Parrish JJ, Susko-Parris JL, Winer MA, First NL. Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin. Biol Reprod 1988 38:1171-1180[Abstract]
  35. Salois D, Menard M, Paquette Y, Manjunath P. Complementary deoxyribonucleic acid cloning and tissue expression of BSP-A3 and BSP 30: phosphatidylcholine and heparin-binding proteins of bovine seminal plasma. Biol Reprod 1999 61:288-297[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Parrish JJ, Susko-Parrish JL, First NL. Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin: inhibitory effect of glucose and role of intracellular pH. Biol Reprod 1989 41:683-699[Abstract]
  37. Wah DA, Fernandez-Tornero C, Sanz L, Romero L, Calvette JJ. Sperm coating mechanisms from the 1.8A crystal structure of PDC-109 phosphorylcholine complex. Structure 2002 10:505-514[Medline]
  38. Hurst RE, Bynum RL, Einfeldt SE, Roy J. The identification of a heparin-binding protein on the surface of bovine sperm. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1988 153:289-293[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Foote RH. Value of testicular and sperm profiles in optimizing reproductive success: lessons learned from selective breeding programs of domestic and laboratory animals. Prog Clin Biol Res 1989 302:107-126[Medline]
  40. Parrish JJ, Susko-Parrish JL, Handrow RR, Sims MM, First NL. Capacitation of bovine spermatozoa by oviduct fluid. Biol Reprod 1989 40:1020-1025[Abstract]
  41. Bosch P, de Avila JM, Ellington JE, Wright RW. Heparin and Ca2+-free medium can enhance release of bull sperm attached to oviductal epithelial cell monolayers. Theriogenology 2001 56:247-260[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Talevi R, Gualtieri R. Sulfated glycoconjugates are powerful modulators of bovine sperm adhesion and release from the oviductal epithelium in vitro. Biol Reprod 2001 64:491-498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Thérien I, Moreau R, Manjunath P. Major proteins of bovine seminal plasma and high-density lipoprotein induce cholesterol efflux from epididymal sperm. Biol Reprod 1998 59:768-776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Muller P, Greube A, Topfer-Petersen E, Herrmann A. Influence of bovine seminal plasma protein PDC-109 on cholesterol in the presence of phospholipids. Eur Biophys J 2002 31:438-447[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Manjunath P, Marcel YL, Uma J, Seidah NG, Chretien M, Chapdelaine A. Apolipoprotein A-I binds to a family of bovine seminal plasma proteins. J Biol Chem 1989 264:16853-16857[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
S. S. Suarez
Control of hyperactivation in sperm
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2008; 14(6): 647 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. L. Tollner, A. I. Yudin, C. A. Treece, J. W. Overstreet, and G. N. Cherr
Macaque sperm coating protein DEFB126 facilitates sperm penetration of cervical mucus
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2523 - 2534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. L. Tollner, A. I. Yudin, A. F. Tarantal, C. A. Treece, J. W. Overstreet, and G. N. Cherr
Beta-Defensin 126 on the Surface of Macaque Sperm Mediates Attachment of Sperm to Oviductal Epithelia
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2008; 78(3): 400 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. G Ignotz, M. Y Cho, and S. S Suarez
Annexins Are Candidate Oviductal Receptors for Bovine Sperm Surface Proteins and Thus May Serve to Hold Bovine Sperm in the Oviductal Reservoir
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2007; 77(6): 906 - 913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A M Petrunkina, D Waberski, A R Gunzel-Apel, and E Topfer-Petersen
Determinants of sperm quality and fertility in domestic species
Reproduction, July 1, 2007; 134(1): 3 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Bergeron, Y. Brindle, P. Blondin, and P. Manjunath
Milk Caseins Decrease the Binding of the Major Bovine Seminal Plasma Proteins to Sperm and Prevent Lipid Loss from the Sperm Membrane During Sperm Storage
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2007; 77(1): 120 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. Talevi, M. Zagami, M. Castaldo, and R. Gualtieri
Redox Regulation of Sperm Surface Thiols Modulates Adhesion to the Fallopian Tube Epithelium
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2007; 76(4): 728 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M.-F. Lusignan, A. Bergeron, M.-H. Crete, C. Lazure, and P. Manjunath
Induction of Epididymal Boar Sperm Capacitation by pB1 and BSP-A1/-A2 Proteins, Members of the BSP Protein Family
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2007; 76(3): 424 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
A. A. Y. Khalil, A. M. Petrunkina, E. Sahin, D. Waberski, and E. Topfer-Petersen
Enhanced Binding of Sperm With Superior Volume Regulation to Oviductal Epithelium
J Androl, November 1, 2006; 27(6): 754 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. M. Gwathmey, G. G. Ignotz, J. L. Mueller, P. Manjunath, and S. S. Suarez
Bovine Seminal Plasma Proteins PDC-109, BSP-A3, and BSP-30-kDa Share Functional Roles in Storing Sperm in the Oviduct
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2006; 75(4): 501 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
M. Fernandez-Juan, M. Gallego, B. Barrios, J. Osada, J. A. Cebrian-Perez, and T. Muino-Blanco
Immunohistochemical Localization of Sperm-Preserving Proteins in the Ram Reproductive Tract
J Androl, July 1, 2006; 27(4): 588 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
S.S. Suarez and A. A. Pacey
Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2006; 12(1): 23 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Ekhlasi-Hundrieser, K. Gohr, A. Wagner, M. Tsolova, A. Petrunkina, and E. Topfer-Petersen
Spermadhesin AQN1 Is a Candidate Receptor Molecule Involved in the Formation of the Oviductal Sperm Reservoir in the Pig
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2005; 73(3): 536 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
B. Barrios, M. Fernandez-Juan, T. Muino-Blanco, and J. A. Cebrian-Perez
Immunocytochemical Localization and Biochemical Characterization of Two Seminal Plasma Proteins That Protect Ram Spermatozoa Against Cold Shock
J Androl, July 1, 2005; 26(4): 539 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
E. Sostaric, C. H.A. van de Lest, B. Colenbrander, and B. M. Gadella
Dynamics of Carbohydrate Affinities at the Cell Surface of Capacitating Bovine Sperm Cells
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2005; 72(2): 346 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Boisvert, A. Bergeron, C. Lazure, and P. Manjunath
Isolation and Characterization of Gelatin-Binding Bison Seminal Vesicle Secretory Proteins
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2004; 70(3): 656 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
69/3/809    most recent
biolreprod.102.010827v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow