Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print February 19, 2003.
Biol Reprod 2003, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.014902
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
69/1/75    most recent
biolreprod.102.014902v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gromoll, J.
Right arrow Articles by Simoni, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gromoll, J.
Right arrow Articles by Simoni, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gromoll, J.
Right arrow Articles by Simoni, M.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 69, 75–80 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.014902
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Mechanisms of Hormone Action

A New Subclass of the Luteinizing Hormone/Chorionic Gonadotropin Receptor Lacking Exon 10 Messenger RNA in the New World Monkey (Platyrrhini) Lineage1

Jörg Gromoll2, Joachim Wistuba, Nicole Terwort, Maren Godmann, Thomas Müller, and Manuela Simoni

Institute of Reproductive Medicine of the University, University of Münster, D-48129 Münster, Germany


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) plays an essential role as a mediator of LH and CG action during embryonic sexual differentiation and in gametogenesis. In a hypogonadal male patient, we recently demonstrated that a genomic deletion of exon 10, located in the hinge region of the extracellular domain, results in discrimination of LH and hCG action. In the common marmoset (Calltithrix jacchus), exon 10 of the LHR is naturally missing at the mRNA level. In order to investigate whether this is an isolated species-specific phenomenon, we performed a phylogenetic screening, searching for the presence of LHR exon 10 mRNA in a number of primate species representative for the major lineages of primate evolution. The expressed LHR region encompassing exon 10 was amplified from testicular tissue by RT-PCR, cloned, and sequenced. In addition, we performed Southern blot analysis of the LHR of selected New World and Old World primates. The results revealed that exon 10 mRNA is lacking in the complete New World monkey (Platyrrhini) lineage but is present in both more primitive and more advanced primates. However, exon 10 seems to be present at the genomic level, arguing for a splicing failure possibly due to a genomic mutation or the lack of appropriate splicing factors. Considering that, in the human, LH is far less active than hCG on the LHR lacking exon 10, we addressed the question whether the existence of such a receptor has any consequences on the dual hormone LH/CG system present in Platyrrhini. Using primers specific for the known marmoset CG ß cDNA, we amplified the CG ß subunit cDNA from male common marmoset pituitaries by RT-PCR, while LH ß could not be amplified, suggesting a possible physiological role of pituitary CG in this species. In conclusion, we demonstrated for the first time that the LH mRNA without exon10 is the natural wild-type LHR in the Platyrrhini lineage. We propose that this LHR represents a new subclass of receptors that should be named LHR type II. In addition, the high expression of CG ß in the marmoset pituitary suggests a physiological role of CG in the reproductive function of these primates beyond pregnancy.

human chorionic gonadotropin, luteinizing hormone, signal transducers, testis


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In primates, the LH receptor (LHR) mediates the action of two hormones, the chorionic gonadotropin (CG) and the luteinizing hormone (LH). The LHR is expressed predominantly in granulosa cells of the ovary and the Leydig cells of the testes. Unlike rodents [1, 2], in the primate, a regular LH-LHR interaction is necessary for normal male sexual differentiation, as documented by the rare cases of LH ß and LHR inactivating mutations in human males [3]. In the primate, CG, produced in the trophoblast, is required for pregnancy maintenance and triggers male sexual differentiation during embryonic development. In contrast, the pituitary-derived LH is crucial for masculinization at puberty and normal gametogenesis [4].

The LHR belongs to the group of glycoprotein hormone receptors, comprising the closely related FSH receptor (FSHR) and TSH receptor (TSHR), which share the common feature of a large extracellular hormone-binding domain and a seven transmembrane domain, the hallmark of the G protein-coupled receptor family. At the genomic level, the three glycoprotein hormone receptors display striking similarities with respect to their genomic organization and exon size. However, while the extracellular domain of the FSHR and TSHR is encoded by nine exons, 10 exons are present in this region of the LHR gene [57]. The transmembrane domain is encoded in all three receptors by one large exon. The genomic organization is conserved throughout all different species analyzed, such as the human, mouse, ovine, and rat.

In the human, the LHR gene spans approximately 80 kilobase pairs (kbp) and is located on chromosome 2p21 (sequence AC073082). Exons 2 to 9 encode leucine-rich repeats believed to be involved in direct hormone binding, while parts of exon 9, the complete exon 10, and a 5'portion of exon 11 form the hinge region [7, 8]. Exon 10 consists of 81 bp encoding 27 amino acids. There are no clear-cut motifs present within this exon, but it contributes to the formation of a C-terminal cysteine cluster of the extracellular domain.

In several species, the LHR gene is alternatively spliced during transcription, either by exon skipping or by use of alternative splice sites, resulting in a number of potential LHR isoforms [914]. Nearly all the described LHR isoforms remain untranslated, or, if translated, they cannot be properly transported to the cell membrane and remain trapped inside the cytoplasm. Thus, according to current knowledge, such LHR isoforms do not play any significant physiological role in hormone binding and signal transduction of LH and CG.

Interestingly, no isoform lacking exon 10 has been reported in humans, rats, and mice [15], and there is only one report indicating that splicing of the LHR gene can result in an LHR isoform lacking exon 10 in the ewe [16]. The only species in which a constitutive skipping of exon 10 has been reported is the common marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus) [17]. In this species, the LHR mRNA lacking exon 10 represents the wild-type form. Functional studies on this LHR revealed that hormone binding and signal transduction are not impaired using hCG. However, so far such studies have not been conducted using LH.

In order to investigate whether the lack of exon 10 in the LHR mRNA of the common marmoset is an isolated, species-specific finding, we performed an RT-PCR-based phylogenetic screening for the presence LHR exon 10 using testicular mRNA from several primate species. Furthermore, considering that in the human LHR, exon 10 is necessary for LH but not for hCG bioactivity [18], we addressed the question whether the lack of exon 10 mRNA might be related to the pituitary expression of CG in the common marmoset.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Snap-frozen testes and ovaries were obtained from different primate species in the frame of a project on efficacy of spermatogenesis funded by the German Research Foundation. Testicular and ovarian tissues from cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) and common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) and marmoset pituitaries were obtained from our own primate colonies. The testicular tissue from the other species analyzed in this study was obtained by castration from male monkeys of different European zoo colonies and primate centers. No other tissues from these monkey could be obtained. All experiments were conducted according to the German Law on Animal Care and Experimentation.

Oligonucleotides

The oligonucleotides used in the RT-PCR reactions were either designed as consensus sequences from nucleotide sequence stretches highly conserved within exon 9 and exon 11 of the human, mouse, rat, and common marmoset LHR, based on the marmoset or from human LHR cDNA sequences.

consensus exon 9 for1

5'-GG(G/C)T(G/A)GAGTCCATTCAGACGCT-3'

consensus exon 11 rev1

5'-GGG(G/A)TT(G/A)AAAGCATCTGGTTC(A/T)GGAG-3'

marmoset exon 9 for1

5'-GCCAATCTCCTGGATGCCACGC-3'

marmoset exon 11 rev1

5'-CAGGAGCACATCGGGGTGTCTTG-3'

human exon 9 for1

5'-CAGAGGCTAATTGCCACGTCATCC-3'

The following amplicons should be obtained when using these primer combinations: 1) consensus exon 9 for1/consensus exon 11 rev1: 335 bp with exon 10; 254 bp without exon 10; 2) consensus exon 9 for1/marmoset exon 11 rev1: 318 bp with exon 10; 237 bp without exon 10; 3) marmoset exon 9 for1/marmoset exon 11 rev1: 240 bp with exon 10; 159 bp without exon 10; and 4) human exon 9 for1/marmoset exon 11 rev1: 303 bp with exon 10; 222 bp without exon 10.

RT-PCR

RNA isolation from testicular tissues was performed using Ultraspec (AMS Biotechnology, Wiesbaden, Germany), followed by a DNAse digestion with the DNA free kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Five micrograms total RNA were reverse transcribed using the appropriate reverse primer and Superscript transcriptase (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). One to two micrograms of cDNA were used for each of the subsequent PCR reactions. PCR cycle conditions were as follows: 1 cycle at 94° 2 min; 30 cycles at 94°C 50 sec, 58°C 40 sec, and 72°C 1 min; a final extension step was performed at 72°C for 10 min. The reactions were electrophoresed on 2% agarose. Several primer combinations were used for each species; however, for some, only one primer combination worked. This is presumably due to sequence variations within this region preventing primer annealing.

RNA was isolated from common marmoset pituitaries and placenta using the Ultraspec method. RNA was reverse transcribed using the previously published reverse primer 5'- GCGGATTCAGAAGCCTTTATTG-3' [19]. Subsequent PCR was performed employing the forward primer 5'- GGGGACGCACCAAGGATG-3' and the reverse primer at the following cycling conditions: 1 cycle at 94°C for 1 min; 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 sec, 60°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 60 sec; the PCR was terminated with a final extension step at 72°C for 56 min. The reactions were run on a 2% agarose gel. The corresponding bands were cloned into the pGEM-T easy vector (Clontech, Heidelberg, Germany) and the inserts sequenced.

DNA Sequencing

The amplicons obtained were purified by High Pure Purification kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and cloned into the pGEM-T easy vector. A minimum of five different clones were sequenced from each amplicon. The DNA sequences given in Figure 3 represent the consensus sequence obtained from these clones using the sequencer software (Genecodes, Ann Arbor, MI). The CLUSTAL W align software (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools) was used for the comparison of the LHR sequences from the different primates.



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Nucleotide sequence comparison of LHR exon 10 cDNA. Nucleotide sequence comparison of the cDNA region encompassing the 3' part of exon 9, exon 10, and the 5' part of exon 11 as obtained by RT-PCR reactions from different primate testes. Unmatched nucleotides are indicated by gray bars. Numbering is according to the marmoset monkey LHR cDNA [17]

Southern Blot

Ten micrograms of genomic DNA isolated from blood samples from the marmoset and cynomolgus macaques and humans were digested with EcoRI and run on a 0.8% agarose gel. The DNA was blotted onto nylon membranes (Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany) and hybridized with a radioactive-labeled marmoset exon 10 probe using ExpressHyb (Clontech). The blot was exposed for 3 days and analyzed using a Phospho-Imager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Phylogenetic Pedigree of Primate Evolution

To cover all recent systematic groups among the primate order reflecting different levels of evolutionary progress, we chose Strepsirrhini and anthropoid species from the Platyrrhini (Cebidae and Callithrichidae) as well as Catarrhini (Cercopithecidae, cynomolgous macaque) and Hominoidea (Pongidae and humans [Hominidae]) (Fig. 1).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Exon 10 mRNA of the LHR is lacking in the New World monkey (Platyrrhini) lineage. This is a schematic survey of the occurrence of the LH receptor type II mRNA without exon 10 among the primate order. While the suborder of the prosimians (Strepsirrhini) shows neither CG [24] nor LHR type II, in the second suborder of the anthropoid primates (Haplorrhini), both LHR types with and without exon 10 occur as well as the hormone CG. The infraorders of the Old World monkeys (Catarrhini) and the great apes revealed LHR type I with exon 10, but exon 10 was absent in the infraorder of the New World monkeys (Platyrrhini), in which species from two out of the three recent families were demonstrated to exhibit LHR type II lacking exon 10 mRNA. Investigated species with exon 10: prosimians: Microcebus murinus, mouse monkey; Eulemur coronatus, crowned lemur; Old World monkeys: Macaca fascicularis, cynomolgous macaque; great apes: Pan paniscus, bonobo and the human (Homo sapiens). Investigated species without exon 10: New World monkeys: family Callithrichidae: Callithrix jacchus, common marmoset; Sanguinus oedipus, cotton top tamarin; family Cebidae: Saimiri sciureus, squirrel monkey; Cebus apella, brown capuchin. The time scale shows evolutionary progress [2426]

RT-PCR of the Exon 9 to Exon 11 Region of the LHR

Testicular tissue was obtained from species shown in Figure 1 and used for RNA isolation. The region encompassing the 3' part of exon 9 to the 5' region of exon 11 of the LHR was amplified by RT-PCR using primer pairs directed to conserved nucleotide sequence stretches among the human, mouse, and rat LHR cDNA within these two exons or using human or marmoset-specific primer pairs. RT-PCR from testicular RNA should yield amplicons containing exon 10 (plus 81 bp) or amplicons lacking exon 10 (minus 81 bp) or both. Analysis of RT-PCRs from testes of different primate species revealed distinct patterns for two amplicons. The results showed only one amplicon including exon 10 in the Strepsirrhini gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus) and crowned lemur (Eulemur coronatus) (Lemuriidae), in the Old World cynomolgus macaque Macaca fascicularis, in the bonobo Pan paniscus (Pongidae), and in the human, while the cebid squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus), the brown capuchin (Cebus apella), the callithrichid common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus), and the cotton top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus) display an amplicon without exon 10 (Fig. 2). This indicates that Strepsirrhini, Catarrhini, Pongidae, and Hominidae correctly splice exon 10 of the LHR giving rise to an exon 9-exon 10-exon 11 amplicon, while in Platyrrhini exon 10 mRNA is skipped. DNA sequencing of the amplicons confirmed the findings. Interestingly, no alternative splicing variants lacking or including exon 10 were observed in all tissues investigated. This implies that exon 10 is not alternatively spliced in these species. Rather, splicing is very efficiently regulated in Strepsirrhini, Catarrhini, and Hominoidea.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. RT-PCR for the detection of the LHR exon 10 mRNA in different primates. Lane 1: human testis 303-bp fragment, primer combination 4; lane 2: P. paniscus testis 318-bp fragment, primer combination 2; lane 3: M. fascicularis testis 318 bp, primer combination 2; lane 4: S. sciureus testis 159 bp, primer combination 3; lane 5: C. apella testis 159 bp, primer combination 3; lane 6: S. oedipus testes 159 bp, primer combination 3; lane 7: C. jacchus testis 159 bp, primer combination 3, lane 8: C. jacchus ovary 159 bp, primer combination 3; lane 9: E. coronatus testis 318 bp, primer combination 2; lane 10: M. murinus 335 bp, primer combination 1; lane 11: negative control. Integrity of the RNA and fidelity of the PCR were confirmed by the simultaneous amplification of the housekeeping gene GAPDH cDNA (not shown). The observed subtle size differences of the amplicons are due to the usage of different primer combinations as outlined previously

Sequence Analysis

A nucleotide sequence alignment of the amplified exon 9 to exon 11 regions revealed an 84% homology between all species (Fig. 3). The 94% homology between phylogenetically related taxonomic groups, such as the great apes and Old World monkeys Catarrhini, is higher (P. paniscus p./M. fascicularis) than in phylogenetically more distant primates, such as great apes and Platyrrhini (77%) (P. paniscus/S. sciureus). Within each systematic group, homology reaches 92%.

At the amino acid level, the overall homology drops to 70%, independent of which exon is analyzed (Fig. 4). Again, closely related species display a higher homology (P. paniscus/M. fascicularis: 92%) compared to more divergent primate species (P. paniscus/S. sciureus: 75%). Apparently similar homologies were observed at both the nucleotide and the amino acid level when exon 9, exon 10, and exon 11 were compared, thereby excluding that exon 10 might be a vestigial exon of the LHR. In all glycoprotein hormone receptors, splicing takes place at the second nucleotide of the last triplet of the corresponding exon, which then is joined to the first nucleotide of the next exon (phase 2 splicing). In Platyrrhini, the last two nucleotides of exon 9 are joined directly to the first nucleotide of exon 11, leading to a triplet encoding aspartic acid (D) instead of glutamic acid (E), which is the amino acid ensuing when exon 9 is joined to exon 10 in the other species.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Amino acid comparison of LHR exon 10. Deduced amino acid sequence comparison of the LHR cDNA. Unmatched amino acids are indicated by gray bars. Numbering is according to the marmoset monkey LHR cDNA

Southern Blot Hybridization of Exon 10

To investigate whether the absence of exon 10 of the LHR mRNA in Platyrrhini might be caused by a genomic deletion removing this part of the LHR gene, we performed a Southern blot using genomic DNA from Platyrrhini and Catarrhini and human (Fig. 5). Hybridizing female and male DNA with a probe corresponding to exon 10 of the LHR revealed distinct specific signals in female and male genomic DNA from all species tested, indicating both the presence of exon 10 sequences in Platyrrhini and the autosomal localization of the LHR gene.



View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Southern blot of human, macaque monkey, and marmoset DNA for LHR exon 10. Genomic DNA was digested with EcoR1. Hybridization was performed using a radioactive-labeled probe corresponding to exon 10 of LHR of the macaque monkey. A molecular-weight marker is given on the left. Lane 1+2 female/male Callithrix jacchus (marmoset monkey); lane 3+4 female/male Macaca fascicularis (cynomolgus monkey); lane 5+6 female/male human DNA

RT-PCR of CG ß mRNA from the Placenta and the Pituitary of the Common Marmoset Monkey (Callithrix jacchus)

In the human, LH is inactive on the LHR lacking exon 10, while hCG results in normal testicular response and testosterone production [18]. In order to analyze which gonadotropin sustains LHR function in the New World monkeys lacking exon 10, we took advantage of the published marmoset CG cDNA sequence [19] and performed RT-PCR from placenta and pituitary tissues of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Using primers previously reported to be capable of amplifying the ß subunit of marmoset CG, we consistently obtained distinct amplicons of approximately 520 bp in size in both tissues (Fig. 6). DNA sequencing of the amplicons (n = 8) revealed 100% nucleotide sequence identity when comparing the placenta CG ß cDNA to the cDNA sequence obtained from the pituitary. No amplicons encoding for a putative LH ß subunit, which is expected to have an additional A nucleotide in the 3' region of the mRNA, were found using this strategy. Attempts were made to amplify the expressed LH ß subunit by using primers designed as consensus from the LH ß sequences known from other species, but again no LH ß could be obtained. Thus, in the marmoset monkey, the CG ß subunit is highly expressed in the pituitary. Pituitary glands from other species were not available.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Presence of CG ß subunit mRNA in the marmoset pituitary and placenta. RT-PCR using LH/CG primer from marmoset Callithrix jacchus pituitary (lane 1) and placental (lane 3) tissues. Lane 2, negative control (-RT)


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the present study, we demonstrated that exon 10 of the LHR is lacking at the transcriptional level in four species of Platyrrhini from the New World. This strongly indicates that exon 10 mRNA might be missing in all primate species of this lineage. In addition, exon 10 mRNA was present both in the Strepsirrhini group, which represents very ancestral primates, and in evolutionarily more advanced primate species, such as Catarrhini and Hominidea, including the human.

There is no indication that exon 10 skipping/splicing is gender or testis specific. In fact, exon 10 is present in the LHR mRNA obtained from ovaries of humans, rats, and mice [14, 15], while it is constitutively skipped in the ovary of the common marmoset (Fig. 2). The Southern blot experiment indicated that, similarly to the Catarrhini and the human, sequences encoding exon 10 must be present at the genomic level in the common marmoset. This is in agreement with previous findings showing cross hybridization of human exon 10 to marmoset genomic DNA [17]. Thus, the lack of exon 10 at the mRNA level is not due to the absence of genomic sequences encoding for it but, presumably, is caused by a transcriptional event in which a nucleotide change in exon 10 prevents splicing or a primate lineage-specific splicing failure caused by impaired action of splice factors.

Exon 10 is constitutively spliced not only in the human and some other primates but also in all lower species in which it has been cloned (e.g., rodents). This indicates the presence of strong splice recognition sites adjacent to exon 10, thereby preventing alternative splicing that instead has been shown for a number of other exons within the LHR gene [15]. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that, up to now, no such LHR isoform lacking exon 10 has been identified in the human, mouse, and rat. Exon 10 mRNA skipping is not an isolated species-specific finding but instead takes place in at least four different monkey species from Platyrrhini and occurs presumably in the whole taxonomic lineage. We, therefore, propose that the LHR exon 10 is the wild-type form for the complete Platyrrhini lineage and forms a new subclass of LHRs in which exon 10 is a pseudoexon. According to the nomenclature of other G protein-coupled receptors [20], this receptor could be defined as LHR type II, where LHR type I represents the complete receptor.

Although at present we do not know the molecular mechanism underlying the constitutive missplicing of exon 10, a chronological approximation of the origin of the observed defect during primate evolution can be deduced. Exon 10 mRNA is present in Strepsirrhini species, such as Microcebus and Eulemur, indicating that exon 10 splicing is normal up to this level of evolution. Therefore, the molecular event leading to the observed missplicing of exon 10 must have occurred after splitting of the Platyrrhini but before splitting of the three suborders Callithrichidae, Calliconidae, and Cebidae within these New World monkeys. In fact, a scenario where such a defect has occurred independently in all subgroups of the Platyrrhini is very unlikely. This leads to the assumption that this change must have taken place during a time interval between 40 and 35 million years ago.

Does exon 10 skipping have any consequences for receptor function, hormone binding, and primate reproductive physiology? Obviously, the common marmoset has normal sexual differentiation and normal reproductive function even without LHR exon 10. Previously, it has been shown that the marmoset LHR binds hCG with normal affinity, indicating normal hormone binding and signal transduction [21]. Recently, we reported a male hypogonadal patient with very high serum LH levels in whom a genomic deletion caused the complete loss of exon 10 of the LHR [18]. Complete inactivation of the LHR in the human leads to pseudohermaphroditism with female phenotype in genotypically male subjects [4]. The normal sexual differentiation of the patient indicated that during embryonic development, hCG was capable of interacting with this truncated receptor, while the high LH levels were unable to sustain pubertal development. Subsequent treatment of the patient with hCG induced androgenization and spermatogenesis onset, strongly supporting our hypothesis that the absence of exon 10 affects LH but not hCG action [18]. Furthermore, functional studies revealed that the human LHR lacking exon 10 is normally expressed at the cell surface and that hCG could evoke normal signal transduction, in terms of cAMP production, while LH signal transduction was severely impaired in the presence of normal hormone binding (data not shown). Therefore, in the human, the absence of exon 10 is not compatible with normal receptor function in the presence of LH. This raises the question of which gonadotropin is involved in LHR activation in the marmoset and, more generally, in the Platyrrhini.

In order to assess whether the endogenous LH is active on the common marmoset LHR lacking exon 10, it will be necessary to clone the marmoset LH ß subunit and express recombinant marmoset LH in vitro. In fact, we found that human LH is active on the marmoset LHR (data not shown), but the well-known species specificity of the LH/LHR interaction [22] suggests caution, and the results obtained by using human LH and common marmoset LHR are not necessarily indicative of the physiological situation in the marmoset. In any case, the pituitary CG is an obvious candidate for the luteotropic action in this species, especially considering its high level of expression and the evolution of the LH beta;/CG ß gene cluster. The CG ß gene derived from the duplication and a single base deletion of the LH ß gene that incorporated its 3'-untranslated region into the coding region, giving rise to a 24 amino acids carboxy-terminal extension [23]. Recently, it has been shown that the duplication of the LH ß gene, which resulted in the formation of the first CG ß subunit gene, should be approximately dated to 30–40 million years ago, after splitting of the Strepsirrhini from the anthropoid line but before splitting of Platyrrhini and Catarrhini [24]. Therefore, two separate LH ß and CG ß genes and a dual hormone system consisting of LH and CG exist in the entire Platyrrhini lineage. We speculated that, in the common ancestor of this lineage, a mutational event occurred in the LHR gene resulting in the loss of exon 10, but this event remained without functional consequences for reproduction because receptor function could be driven, at least in part, by CG. This hypothesis requires that CG ß is expressed at the pituitary level. Indeed, we found the CG ß mRNA is highly expressed (by RT-PCR) in the pituitary of male and female Callithrix jacchus, supporting this hypothesis and suggesting that CG has some function beyond pregnancy. The pituitary expression of CG ß is also compatible with the evolutionary events of LH ß gene duplication. In fact, it should be assumed that, in the species in which it occurred, the duplication also involved the regulatory sequences, implying pituitary expression of the new subunit [25]. This expression pattern might have been maintained in the common marmoset and, presumably, in other Platyrrhini, owing to the LHR exon 10 deletion, independently on the expression at the placenta level, which might be an earlier event in evolution [25]. In this context, it is interesting to observe that with our RT-PCR strategies, we were unable to amplify LH-specific sequences from pituitary RNA. Further investigation of the LH ß/CG ß gene cluster of the marmoset monkey at the genomic level is necessary to understand better the genomic organization, function, and control of gene expression of LH and CG in Platyrrhini.

In summary, these data suggest that a very ancient evolutionary step in the development of the dual LH/CG hormone system is present in the common marmoset. In this species, pituitary expression of CG is maintained, unlike in other primate species in which the expression of CG is restricted to the placenta. Together with the presence of the LHR type II, this finding suggests that, in Platyrrhini, CG plays a more crucial role in reproductive physiology compared to higher primates and the human, where the physiological CG action is restricted to pregnancy.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Professor Eberhard Nieschlag, director of the Institute of Reproductive Medicine, is thanked for continuous support of the work. We would like to thank Prof. Gerhard Weinbauer, Covance Inc., Münster, and Dr. Keith Hodges, German Primate Center, Göttingen, for providing monkey tissues. We acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of L. Pekel and would like to thank M. Heuermann and G. Stehlke for animal care. We are grateful to Susan Nieschlag, M.A., for language editing the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 The work is supported by the German Research Foundation (GR 1547/2-1; WE1167/4-1/2). Back

2 Correspondence: Jörg Gromoll, Institute of Reproductive Medicine, University of Münster, Domagkstrasse 11, 48129 Münster, Germany. FAX: 49 2518356093; gromolj{at}uni-muenster.de Back

Received: 20 December 2002.

First decision: 13 January 2003.

Accepted: 6 February 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Lei ZM, Mishra S, Zou W, Xu M, Foltz M, Li X, Rao CV. Targeted disruption of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptor gene. Mol Endocrinol 2001 15:184-200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Zhang FP, Poutanen M, Wilbertz J, Huhtaniemi I. Normal prenatal but arrested postnatal sexual development of luteinizing hormone receptor knockout (LURKO) mice. Mol Endocrinol 2001 15:172-183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Huhtaniemi I, Zhang FP, Hamalainen T, Poutanen M. Transgenic and knockout mouse models for the study of luteinizing hormone and luteinizing hormone receptor function. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2002 187:49-56[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Gromoll J, Gudermann T, Schulz A, Teerds K, Greschniok A, Nieschlag E, Seif F. A homozygous mutation within the conserved Ala-Phe-Asn-Glu-Thr motif of exon 7 of the LH receptor causes male pseudohermaphroditism. Eur J Endocrinol 2002 147:597-608[Abstract]
  5. Atger M, Misrahi M, Sar S, Le Flem L, Dessen P, Milgrom E. Structure of the human luteinizing hormone-choriogonadotropin receptor gene: unusual promoter and 5' non-coding regions. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1995 111:113-123[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Gromoll J, Pekel L, Nieschlag E. The structure and genomic organization of the human follicle stimulating hormone receptor gene. Genomics 1996 35:308-311[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Ascoli M, Fanelli F, Segaloff DL. The lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor, a 2002 perspective. Endocr Rev 2002 23:141-174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Zeng H, Phang T, Song YS, Ji I, Ji TH. The role of the hinge region of the luteinizing hormone receptor in hormone interaction and signal generation. J Biol Chem 2001 276:3451-3458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Aatsinki JT, Pietila EM, Lakkakorpi JT, Rajaniemi HJ. Expression of the LH/CG receptor gene in rat ovarian tissue is regulated by an extensive alternative splicing of the primary transcript. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1992 84:127-135[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Tsai-Morris CH, Buczko E, Wang W, Dufau ML. Intronic nature of the rat luteinizing hormone receptor gene defines a soluble receptor subspecies with hormone binding activity. J Biol Chem 1990 265:19385-19388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Bacich DJ, Rohan RM, Norman RJ, Rodgers RJ. Characterization and relative abundance of alternatively spliced luteinizing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in the ovine ovary. Endocrinology 1994 35:735-744
  12. Koo YB, Ji I, Ji TH. Characterization of different sizes of rat luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor messenger ribonucleic acids. Endocrinology 1994 134:19-26[Abstract]
  13. Sokka T, Hamalainen T, Huhtaniemi L. Functional LH receptor appears in the neonatal rat ovary after changes in the alternative splicing pattern of the LH receptor mRNA. Endocrinology 1992 130:1738-1740[Abstract]
  14. Reinholz MM, Zschunke MA, Roche PC. Loss of alternately spliced mRNA of the luteinizing hormone receptor and stability of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor mRNA in granulosa cell tumors of the human ovary. Gynecol Oncol 2000 79:264-271[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Lou H, Gagel RF. Alternative ribonucleic acid processing in endocrine systems. Endocr Rev 2001 22:205-225[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Abdennebi L, Lesport AS, Remy JJ, Grebert D, Pisselet C, Monniaux D, Salesse R. Differences in splicing of mRNA encoding LH receptor in theca cells according to breeding season in ewes. Reproduction 2002 123:819-826[Abstract]
  17. Zhang FP, Rannikko AS, Manna PR, Fraser HM, Huhtaniemi IT. Cloning and functional expression of the luteinizing hormone receptor complementary deoxyribonucleic acid from the marmoset monkey testis: absence of sequences encoding exon 10 in other species. Endocrinology 1997 138:2481-2490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Gromoll J, Eiholzer U, Nieschlag E, Simoni M. Male hypogonadism caused by homozygous deletion of exon 10 of the luteinizing hormone (LH) receptor: differential action of human chorionic gonadotropin and LH. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000 85:2281-2286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Simula AP, Amato F, Faast R, Lopata A, Berka J, Norm RJ. Luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin bioactivity in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is due to a chorionic gonadotropin molecule with a structure intermediate between human chorionic gonadotropin and human luteinizing hormone. Biol Reprod 1995 53:380-389[Abstract]
  20. Neill JD. GnRH and GnRH receptor genes in the human genome. Endocrinology 2002 3:737-743
  21. Zhang FP, Kero J, Huhtaniemi I. The unique exon 10 of the luteinizing hormone receptor is necessary for expression of the receptor protein at the plasma membrane in the human luteinizing hormone receptor, but deleterious when inserted into the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1998 142:165-174[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Jia XC, Oikawa M, Bo M, Tanaka T, Ny T, Boime I, Hsueh AJ. Expression of human luteinizing hormone (LH) receptor: interaction with LH and chorionic gonadotropin from human but not equine, rat, and ovine species. Mol Endocrinol 1991 5:759-768[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Talmadge K, Vamvakopoulus NC, Fiddes JC. Evolution of the genes for the beta subunits of human chorionic gondotropin and luteinizing hormone. Nature 1984 307:37-40[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Kumar S, Hedges SB. A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature 1998 392:917-920
  25. Maston GA, Ruvolo M. Chorionic gonadotropin has a recent origin within primates and an evolutionary history of selection. Mol Biol Evol 2002 19:320-335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hedges SB, Parker PH, Sibley CG, Kumar S. Continental breakup and the ordinal diversification of birds and mammals. Nature 1996 381:226-229



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Henke, C. Marc Luetjens, M. Simoni, and J. Gromoll
Chorionic Gonadotropin {beta}-Subunit Gene Expression in the Marmoset Pituitary Is Controlled by Steroidogenic Factor 1, Early Growth Response Protein 1, and Pituitary Homeobox Factor 1
Endocrinology, December 1, 2007; 148(12): 6062 - 6072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. Gromoll, L. Lahrmann, M. Godmann, T. Muller, C. Michel, S. Stamm, and M. Simoni
Genomic Checkpoints for Exon 10 Usage in the Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Type 1 and Type 2
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2007; 21(8): 1984 - 1996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
R. K Chandolia, C. M. Luetjens, J. Wistuba, C.-H. Yeung, E. Nieschlag, and M. Simoni
Changes in endocrine profile and reproductive organs during puberty in the male marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus).
Reproduction, August 1, 2006; 132(2): 355 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Wistuba, C. M. Luetjens, R. Wesselmann, E. Nieschlag, M. Simoni, and S. Schlatt
Meiosis in Autologous Ectopic Transplants of Immature Testicular Tissue Grafted to Callithrix jacchus
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2006; 74(4): 706 - 713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
B. Karges, S. Gidenne, C. Aumas, F. Haddad, P. A. Kelly, E. Milgrom, and N. de Roux
Zero-Length Cross-Linking Reveals that Tight Interactions between the Extracellular and Transmembrane Domains of the Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Persist during Receptor Activation
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 19(8): 2086 - 2098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Kleinau, H. Jaschke, S. Neumann, J. Lattig, R. Paschke, and G. Krause
Identification of a Novel Epitope in the Thyroid-stimulating Hormone Receptor Ectodomain Acting as Intramolecular Signaling Interface
J. Biol. Chem., December 3, 2004; 279(49): 51590 - 51600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Wistuba, M. Mundry, C. M. Luetjens, and S. Schlatt
CoGrafting of Hamster (Phodopus sungorus) and Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) Testicular Tissues into Nude Mice Does Not Overcome Blockade of Early Spermatogenic Differentiation in Primate Grafts
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2004; 71(6): 2087 - 2091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. R. Moyle, Y. Xing, W. Lin, D. Cao, R. V. Myers, J. E. Kerrigan, and M. P. Bernard
Model of Glycoprotein Hormone Receptor Ligand Binding and Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44442 - 44459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Honaramooz, M.-W. Li, M. C. T. Penedo, S. Meyers, and I. Dobrinski
Accelerated Maturation of Primate Testis by Xenografting into Mice
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2004; 70(5): 1500 - 1503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
69/1/75    most recent
biolreprod.102.014902v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gromoll, J.
Right arrow Articles by Simoni, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gromoll, J.
Right arrow Articles by Simoni, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gromoll, J.
Right arrow Articles by Simoni, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS