Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print February 5, 2003.
Biol Reprod 2003, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.015347
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
69/1/30    most recent
biolreprod.103.015347v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhat, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhat, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bhat, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, D. R.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 69, 30–36 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.015347
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Immunology

Does Leptin Mediate the Effect of Photoperiod on Immune Function in Mice?1

Ganapathy K. Bhat, Marissa L. Hamm, Joseph U. Igietseme, and David R. Mann2

Cooperative Reproductive Science Research Center, and Departments of Physiology and Microbiology and Immunology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30310


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Seasonal fluctuations in immune status have been documented for avian and mammalian populations. During the late summer and early fall, immune function is bolstered to help animals cope with the more physiologically demanding winter. The environmental cue for these seasonal changes is apparently decreasing photoperiod. In the present study, we determined the potential role of leptin in mediating the effect of photoperiod on cell-mediated immune responses in male mice. Leptin-deficient (ob/ob) and littermate control mice were housed for 10 wk in either a short (8L:16D) or a long (16L:8D) photoperiod beginning at 6 wk of age. After the mice were killed, immune and reproductive organs were weighed and splenocytes isolated. The proliferative and cytokine responses (interleukin [IL]-2 and IL-4) of splenocytes to the T-cell mitogen, concanavalin A (Con A; 0–40 µg/ml), were determined. Body weights were elevated and both testes and seminal vesicle weights subnormal in ob/ob mice (by ANOVA, main effect of leptin deficiency), but thymuses and spleens were of normal size. Serum leptin levels were at minimum detection limits in ob/ob mice, but leptin levels in control mice housed at 8L:16D were higher than in control mice housed at 16L:8D. The proliferative response of splenocytes from ob/ob mice to Con A was subnormal (by ANOVA, main effect of leptin deficiency), but photoperiod had no effect on this response. Production of IL-2 in splenocytes of ob/ob mice was subnormal (by ANOVA, main effect of leptin deficiency) irrespective of photoperiod, but cells from mice housed at 8L:16D (by ANOVA, main effect of photoperiod) produced more IL-2 than cells from animals housed at 16L:8D. In contrast, a leptin deficiency did not alter IL-4 production, but cells from animals (ob/ob and controls) housed at 16L:8D produced less IL-4 than cells from animals housed at 8L:16D (by ANOVA, main effect of photoperiod). The present study suggests that both photoperiod and leptin have mutually independent effects on the proliferation of lymphocytes and cytokine production profiles. The data do not provide definitive support for the hypothesis that photoperiod-induced changes in leptin secretion mediate the effects of season on immune status.

cytokines, environment, leptin, spermatogenesis


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals living in temperate zones frequently show seasonal fluctuations in a variety of physiological processes, including reproductive function [1]. Because these animals often experience major seasonal differences in food availability and energy needs and reproduction requires substantial energy expenditure, the termination of breeding during the winter in some species is an important survival strategy [2]. In addition to seasonal reproduction, mammalian and avian species also show seasonal rhythms in body mass, thermoregulation, immune status, and disease prevalence [26]. Mortality rates are usually higher during the winter than during the summer months [7]. The balance of evidence supports the hypothesis that the seasonal rhythms of disease prevalence result from seasonal cycles of immune competence and, therefore, of susceptibility to disease rather than from differences in exposure to pathogens [8]. During the more physiologically demanding winter, individuals of a species are more likely to succumb to opportunistic diseases at times when their immune systems are most vulnerable [3]. As a result, species have evolved survival mechanisms to bolster immune function in anticipation of the deterioration of environmental conditions in the winter [7, 9, 10].

The environmental signal that apparently cues the enhancement of immune function during the late summer and fall is a decreasing photoperiod [3, 7, 11, 12]. This survival mechanism is not limited to species that show a robust reproductive response to changing day-length. For example, the reproductive system of the house mouse is relatively insensitive to photoperiod, but this species shows photoperiod-induced fluctuations in the size of immune organs and immune function [13, 14]. Also, humans, like the house mouse and laboratory rat, do not show major seasonal fluctuations in reproductive function but do exhibit seasonal differences in immune system activity and disease prevalence [3].

The regulatory factors that mediate photoperiod-induced changes in immune status have not been fully identified. The effects of photoperiod length on the immune system appear to occur independent of reproductive status and sex steroids [3, 12]. Several humoral factors, including melatonin, have been proposed as potential mediators of the effects of photoperiod on immune function. Melatonin secretion is elevated during the nocturnal phase of the light-dark cycle, and this hormone has been shown to bolster immune function both in vivo and in vitro [3, 15, 16].

Another potential mediator of the effects of photoperiod on the immune system is leptin, a product of the obese gene that is produced predominantly by white adipose tissue [17, 18]. Mice that are homozygous for the mutation (ob/ob) of this gene have a leptin deficiency and are obese [19]. Leptin regulates appetite and energy expenditure at the hypothalamic level [19, 20]. However, it has become increasingly apparent that leptin exerts other direct effects on nonneural cells [21, 22]. The effect of leptin on immune function has recently received considerable attention [23, 24]. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells express the long isoform of the leptin receptor (Ob-Rb) [25], the form of the receptor that is involved in intracellular signaling [21]. The ob/ob (i.e., leptin-deficient) and db/db (i.e., deficient in the leptin receptor) mice have impaired T cell-dependent immunity [26, 27]. Humans with low body weight have reduced levels of leptin and a deficient cell-mediated immune response [28, 29]. Leptin apparently shifts the T-cell response to favor the production of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., interleukin [IL]-2 and interferon-{gamma}) over cytokines that predominantly regulate humoral immune function (e.g., IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10) [30].

In many nonhuman species, the levels of adiposity change with the season; hence, seasonal fluctuations result in circulating leptin levels [31]. These seasonal rhythms are apparently driven by changes in photoperiod. Given that the data support a tropic role for leptin in immune function and that leptin secretion varies with the season, we investigated in the present study the involvement of leptin in mediating photoperiod-induced changes in immune function using the ob/ob male mouse as an animal model. A second objective was to assess the effect of leptin deficiency and photoperiod on testicular morphology and testosterone secretion, because photoperiod-induced changes in immune function may be mediated via altered gonadal function.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

Six-week-old ob/ob male mice (C57 BL/6J-Lep[ob]) and littermate controls (homozygous for leptin gene) were obtained from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and were housed under controlled laboratory conditions. All experiments were conducted according to the principles and procedures of the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Fourteen ob/ob and 14 littermate control mice were housed under a 12L:12D photoperiod for 1 wk before the experiment. Animals were then divided randomly into four groups of seven animals each and were maintained under either a short photoperiod of 8L:16D (8:16) or a long photoperiod of 16L:8D (16:8) for a period of 10 wk. The four treatment groups of animals were as follows: 1) controls, 8:16; 2) ob/ob, 8:16; 3) control, 16:8; and 4) ob/ob, 16:8. The animals were fed a mouse formula diet (5008; Purina Mills, St. Louis, MO) ad libitum throughout the experiment, and daily food consumption and body weights were recorded for each mouse. At the end of 10 wk, animals were lightly anesthetized with halothane vapors and killed by decapitation. Trunk blood was collected for later assay of leptin and testosterone, and the thymus, spleen, epididymal fat pads, testes, and seminal vesicles were removed and weighed. The testes were placed in 10% formalin for later histological processing.

Spleens were cut into three to four small pieces and placed in chilled RPMI medium containing 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml of penicillin, 100 µg/ml of streptomycin, and 10 µM 2-mercaptoethanol and were used immediately for isolation of splenocytes and to assess their proliferative response to the T-cell mitogen, concanavalin A (Con A).

Isolation of Splenocytes (Lymphocytes)

Lymphocytes were isolated as described previously [32]. Briefly, the spleen pieces were forced through a tea strainer into a Petri dish containing chilled medium. The cell suspension was filtered through nylon mesh and centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 10 min. The cells were then resuspended in 1 ml of a Tris-NH4Cl lysis buffer (pH 7.2) for 3 min to lyse any red blood cells. After the 3-min period, additional medium was added, and the cell suspension was centrifuged, resuspended in fresh medium, and washed three times. The cells were then resuspended in 1 ml of RPMI medium containing 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml of penicillin, 100 µg/ml of streptomycin, and 5% fetal calf serum, and the concentration of viable cells was determined by trypan blue exclusion. Cells were then diluted to a final concentration of 105 viable cells per 100 µl in the same media.

Lymphocyte Proliferation Assay

Lymphocytes (105 cells) were cultured for 48 h in duplicate 96-well culture plates with increasing concentrations of Con A (0, 0.6, 2.5, 5.0, 10, 20, and 40 µg/ml) at 37°C in a CO2 incubator. At the end of 48 h, culture supernatants were removed from one set of plates for the measurement of IL-2 (Th-1 proinflammatory cytokine) and IL-4 (Th-2 cytokine) production. The other set of plates was used to determine the level of lymphocyte proliferation via a colorimetric assay (CellTiter 96; Promega, Madison, WI). The maximum proliferation index for lymphocytes in response to the mitogen was calculated

for each animal.

Cytokine Assays

Production of IL-2 and IL-4 was measured using commercially available ELISA kits (Biosource International, Inc., Camarillo, CA). The minimum detection limits for IL-2 and Il-4 were 8 and 5 pg/ml, respectively.

Hormone Assays

Serum leptin and testosterone were measured using ELISA kits (Assay Designs, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, and Alpha Diagnostic International, San Antonio, TX, respectively). The minimum detection limits for the leptin and testosterone assays were 5 and 10 pg/ml, respectively.

Histology

Testes were embedded in paraffin using conventional histological methods, and 8-µm sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin for microscopic examination. We assessed testicular development and spermatogenesis by measuring seminiferous tubular area and determining the number of pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids in each tubule and the percentage of seminiferous tubules exhibiting sperm bundles (elongated spermatids) using imaging technology (ImagePro Plus Software; Media Cybernetics, Silver Springs, MD). Twenty tubules were randomly selected from each animal (six animals/group) for these determinations.

Statistical Analysis

Two-way ANOVA was used initially to assess the potential significance of major effects (leptin deficiency and photoperiod). When the ANOVA indicated a significant interaction of the two variables (leptin deficiency and photoperiod), a Fisher Least Significant Difference (LSD) test was utilized for multiple comparisons of group means. Differences were considered to be statistically significant when P values were equal to or less than 0.05. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Body and Organ Weights and Testicular Morphology

The effects of a leptin deficiency and photoperiod on body and organ weights are shown in Table 1. Body weights and the weights of epididymal fat pads in ob/ob animals were more than 2- and 5-fold greater, respectively, than in littermate controls (P < 0.0001 for both parameters). However, the testes and seminal vesicles of ob/ob mice were smaller than those of controls (based on ANOVA; main effect of leptin deficiency; P = 0.043 and 0.013, respectively). Photoperiod length did not affect body or reproductive organ weights. Weights of the thymus and spleen were not significantly affected by the leptin deficiency or photoperiod length (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Effect of a leptin deficiency and photoperiod on body, organ, and epididymal fat pad weights in male mice.a

Testicular morphology of ob/ob mice revealed a number of signs of impaired spermatogenesis (compare Fig. 1A from a control animal with Fig. 1, B and C, from two ob/ob mice). Within testicular sections of ob/ob animals were distinct regions where the seminiferous tubules exhibited reduced cellularity and an absence of elongated spermatids (Fig. 1B). Also, evidence was found of tubular vacuolization and condensation of germ cell nuclei (Fig. 1B, arrows), particularly in pachytene spermatocytes. Condensation of nuclei was also evident in the round spermatid population, which is characteristic of degenerating germ cells. A large number of syncytia formed by degenerating round spermatids were also observed in sections from the testes of ob/ob mice (Fig. 1C, arrows). In general, however, the effects of the leptin deficiency on testicular morphology were not diffuse. For example, large regions were observed within testicular sections of ob/ob animals where tubular morphology and spermatogenesis appeared to be normal (Fig. 1D). The patchiness of the effect of the leptin deficiency (by ANOVA) on testicular morphology was reflected in the marginal smaller seminiferous tubule areas (P = 0.078) and the marginally lower number of pachytene spermatocytes (P = 0.091) (data not shown). Photoperiod length did not affect the mean area of the seminiferous tubule or numbers of pachytene spermatocytes. However, photoperiod length did affect the percentage of tubules that exhibited sperm bundles (elongated spermatids, ANOVA, main effect of photoperiod, P = 0.037). The percentage of seminiferous tubules that exhibited sperm bundles from mice housed at 16:8 was lower than that of mice housed at 8:16.



View larger version (177K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Representative photomicrographs of hematoxylin-eosin-stained testicular sections from control (A) and ob/ob (BD) mice. Whereas the control mice (lep/lep) showed normal spermatogenesis (A), the ob/ob mice exhibited a marked reduction in cellularity, condensation of germ cell nuclei (arrows), and absence of elongated spermatids (B) as well as a number of syncytia (arrows) formed by the apoptotic round spermatids (C). However, in large regions within the testis of ob/ob animals, spermatogenesis appeared to be normal (D). Magnification x200

Serum Leptin and Testosterone Concentrations

Significant effects of the leptin deficient (P < 0.0001) and of photoperiod (P = 0.030) and a significant interaction (P = 0.031) of the two variables (based on the two-way ANOVA) on serum leptin concentrations (Fig. 2A) were found. Serum leptin values in ob/ob mice were near or below minimum detection limits regardless of the photoperiod conditions (Fig. 2A). However, in control mice, leptin levels were significantly higher (P = 0.030) in animals housed at 8:16 compared to those housed at 16:8. The tendency was for serum testosterone levels to be lower in ob/ob mice than in littermate controls, but because of the high variability of testosterone values in control mice, this difference did not reach the levels of significance (Fig. 2B). No effect of photoperiod on circulating testosterone concentrations was observed.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Serum leptin (A) and testosterone (B) concentrations (mean ± SEM) in ob/ob and control mice maintained at either 8:16 or 16:8. Two-way ANOVA indicated a significant main effect of leptin deficiency (P < 0.0001) and photoperiod (P = 0.030) and a significant interaction (P = 0.031) on serum leptin concentrations. aSignificantly different from controls housed at 8:16, bsignificantly different from ob/ob mice housed at 8:16, csignificantly different from controls housed at 16:8

Proliferative and Cytokine Responses of Lymphocytes to a T-Cell Mitogen In Vitro

Lymphocytes from ob/ob mice showed a subnormal (ANOVA, main effect of leptin deficiency, P = 0.017) maximum proliferation index in response to the mitogen, Con A (Fig. 3A). The cytokine production pattern by lymphocytes from ob/ob animals also differed from that of the cells of control mice. Production of the proinflammatory cytokine, IL-2, in response to Con A was subnormal (ANOVA, main effect of leptin deficiency, P = 0.0004) from cells of ob/ob mice irrespective of the photoperiod (Fig. 3B). Photoperiod length also affected (ANOVA, main effect of photoperiod, P = 0.027) IL-2 production by lymphocytes. Production of IL-2 by lymphocytes from mice housed at 16:8 was lower than that from cells of animals housed at 8:16.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Effect of leptin deficiency and photoperiod on the maximum proliferation index (MPI; A) and on the IL-2 (B) and IL-4 (C) production profiles by splenocytes in response to 0.6 µg/ml of Con A (submaximal dose). Two-way ANOVA indicated a significant main effect of the leptin deficiency (P = 0.017), but no effect of photoperiod or interaction of the two variables on MPI was observed. A significant main effect of both the leptin deficiency (P = 0.004) and photoperiod (P = 0.027) was observed, but no interaction of the two variables on IL-2 production was seen. A significant main effect of photoperiod (P = 0.037) was observed, but no effect of the leptin deficiency or interaction of the two variables on IL-4 production was found. Results are shown as the mean ± SEM

On the other hand, a leptin deficiency did not alter the production profiles of IL-4, a cytokine predominantly involved in the regulation of humoral immune responses (Fig. 3C). Lymphocytes from both the ob/ob and control animals produced similar amounts of IL-4 in response to Con A stimulation. However, IL-4 production from lymphocytes of mice (ob/ob and control) housed at 16:8 was reduced (ANOVA, main effect of photoperiod, P = 0.037) compared to that from the cells of animals housed at 8:16.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the present study, both photoperiod and leptin deficiency significantly altered parameters of cell-mediated immunity in male mice, but the effects of the two variables on immune status did not appear to be related to one another. Thus, data from the present study do not give credence to the concept that seasonal fluctuations in adiposity and leptin secretion are involved in mediating annual cycles of immune status and susceptibility to disease in wild mammalian and avian populations.

In the present study, the in vitro proliferative response of splenocytes from ob/ob mice to the mitogen, Con A, was subnormal, but photoperiod alone did not significantly alter this response. It should be noted that control mice housed under a short photoperiod (8:16) had significantly elevated leptin levels compared to controls housed under a long photoperiod (16:8). Thus, the data suggest that whereas leptin is necessary to maintain a normal lymphocyte proliferative response to this mitogen, photoperiod-induced changes in leptin secretion are not associated with significant alterations in this type of immune response to a foreign antigen.

Both leptin deficiency and photoperiod significantly altered cytokine production profiles by splenocytes in response to Con A, but these effects of the two variables appeared to occur largely independent of one another. For example, IL-2 production by splenocytes of ob/ob mice was reduced relative to that by cells of control mice regardless of the photoperiod conditions (ANOVA, main effect of leptin deficiency), and cells from mice housed under a short photoperiod produced more IL-2 than cells from animals housed under the long photoperiod (ANOVA, main effect of photoperiod). However, no significant interaction of the two variables on IL-2 production was found. The lack of a significant interaction suggests that the effects of the leptin deficiency and photoperiod on IL-2 production occurred independent of each other. Profiles of IL-4 production were not affected by the leptin deficiency, but cells from animals housed in the long photoperiod (ANOVA, main effect of photoperiod) exhibited an attenuated IL-4 response to the mitogen. These results indicate that both leptin and photoperiod have substantial effects on cytokine production profiles by lymphocytes, but the photoperiod-induced changes in these responses do not appear to be mediated by alterations in leptin secretion.

Leptin belongs structurally to the long-chain helical cytokine family that includes IL-2, IL-12, and growth hormone and that signals via a class I cytokine receptor [23, 33]. Leptin-deficient (ob/ob) mice exhibit a number of features usually associated with animals during chronic starvation, such as low body temperature, hyperphagia, infertility, and impaired immune function [23]. It has been proposed that leptin serves as an important link between nutritional status and T-lymphocyte function [23]. Both ob/ob and leptin receptor-deficient (db/db) mice have impaired T-cell immunity [26, 27], and a leptin-signaling deficiency compromises both humoral and cellular immunity and attenuates the symptoms associated with experimentally induced arthritis in mice [34]. Moreover, bacterial lipopolysaccharide administration to rodents up-regulates leptin expression in adipocytes and increases circulating leptin levels in addition to mobilizing defense responses [35, 36]. Leptin also protects mice from starvation-induced lymphoid tissue atrophy and increases thymic cellularity in ob/ob mice [37]. These data, along with evidence from the present study, support the idea of a major role for leptin in linking the level of nutrition to immune competence.

In the present study, splenocytes from ob/ob mice produced less of the proinflammatory cytokine, IL-2, but the leptin deficiency had no significant effect on production of the Th-2 prototype cytokine, IL-4. These data are in agreement with previous findings that leptin promotes the production of Th-1 cytokines but has an adverse effect on the production of Th-2 cytokines [30, 38]. Loffreda et al. [38] reported that leptin activates macrophages, induces their expression of proinflammatory cytokines, and increases macrophage function, whereas animals that are deficient in leptin signaling (ob/ob and db/db mice) exhibit impaired macrophage activity.

The effects of photoperiod on immune function vary according to the immunological parameter assessed and the animal model employed. In general, however, exposure of animals to a short photoperiod under laboratory conditions (abundance of food and mild temperatures) is associated with enhancement of immune status. The most frequently utilized mammalian models for these studies have been the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii) and Siberian hamster (Phodopus sungoris), and results have varied considerably between these two species. The deer mouse is a temperate-zone animal, whereas the Siberian hamster is exposed to more severe shifts of environmental conditions in the wild. The differences in habitats may account for some of the differences reported for the two species. Under laboratory conditions, housing both species under a photoperiod that mimics winter day-length (8:16) is associated with testicular and reproductive tract regression [9, 10, 39, 40]. In deer mice, exposure to a short photoperiod at laboratory temperature results in an elevation of total serum immunoglobulin G levels and an enhancement of the lymphocyte proliferative response in vitro to Con A [9, 10]. In Siberian hamsters, basal proliferation of lymphocytes and natural killer cell activity were increased, but the humoral response to an antigen as well as granulocyte and monocyte phagocytosis of bacteria were attenuated under winter-like photoperiod conditions [39, 40]. Body weight, epididymal fat mass, and circulating leptin levels were reduced in hamsters housed under a short photoperiod, suggesting that leptin does not mediate photoperiod-induced enhancement of lymphocyte proliferation or natural killer cell activity but leaving open the possibility that leptin may be mediating the effects of photoperiod on humoral immunity in this species. These data appear to be in agreement with results from the present study in the mouse: Photoperiod has substantial effects on immune responses (e.g., cytokine production profiles) that occur independent of the status of leptin secretion (i.e., in both ob/ob and control mice).

Melatonin appears to play an important role in mediating the effects of photoperiod on immune function. Although secretion of this hormone rises during the dark phase of the light-dark cycle and lymphocytes from deer mice treated with melatonin exhibited an increased proliferative response to a T-cell mitogen, melatonin had no effect on antibody production in response to a foreign antigen [9, 41]. Because the effects of melatonin on lymphocyte proliferation occurred in both intact and castrated mice, melatonin-induced alterations in reproductive function did not mediate this response [41]. It would appear, then, that the photoperiod-induced changes in lymphocyte proliferation in the deer mouse and increased lymphocyte production of IL-2 and IL-4 from mice housed under a short photoperiod in the present study may be mediated by photoperiod-induced alterations in melatonin secretion. However, the pattern of melatonin secretion in response to photoperiod in the deer mouse, which is a seasonal breeder, may differ substantially from that in the house mouse, which is largely a nonseasonal breeder [13]; therefore, such a conclusion must be viewed with considerable caution.

It should be noted that in the present study, housing control mice under a short photoperiod elevated their serum leptin concentrations despite having no significant effect on body weight or epididymal fat pad mass (white adipose tissue). This result is suggestive that short photoperiod conditions increased the level of leptin expression in available white adipose tissue rather than increasing the level of adiposity in these animals. A comparison of leptin expression in adipose tissue between mice maintained under a short versus a long photoperiod would help to delineate whether this is true.

The present study provides further evidence that the effects of photoperiod on immune function are not mediated by photoperiod-induced changes in gonadal function. Photoperiod length had no significant effect on the weights of reproductive organs, testicular morphology, or serum testosterone levels in either ob/ob or control mice. However, a trend was observed for serum testosterone levels to be subnormal in ob/ob mice. Given that androgens are known to influence immune function [42], in a future study we may compare photoperiod-induced immune effects in intact versus castrated ob/ob mice. On the other hand, short-day enhancement of immune function in deer mice occurred in both intact and castrated animals [12].

A secondary objective of the present study was to further characterize the effects of leptin deficiency on testicular morphology and spermatogenesis. Testes and seminal vesicle weights in ob/ob mice were subnormal, and serum testosterone concentrations tended to be lower (but not significantly so) in ob/ob mice than in control mice. An examination of testicular morphology of ob/ob mice revealed marginally reduced seminiferous tubular size (area) and cellularity and subnormal numbers of spermatocytes. These findings are in agreement with those of previous studies reporting that the overall structure of the testes of ob/ob mice is abnormal and characterized by multinucleated spermatids, few spermatozoa, and a reduced amount of interstitial tissue [43, 44]. In the present study, the testes of ob/ob mice exhibited many premeiotic pachytene spermatocytes with darkly stained chromatin and eosinophilic cytoplasm, and evidence was also found for the presence of syncytia formed by, presumably, apoptotic round spermatids, a characteristic of degenerating germ cells [45]. What was perhaps somewhat surprising, however, was the less-than-diffuse effect of the leptin deficiency on testicular morphology. Despite the impaired nature of spermatogenesis in many tubules, large regions within the testes of the ob/ob mice showed testicular morphology and spermatogenesis that appeared to be normal.

In summary, the data from the present study do not provide definitive support for the contention that photoperiod-induced changes in leptin secretion mediate the effects of photoperiod on cell-mediated immune responses. Instead, both photoperiod length and leptin deficiency had significant, but largely independent, effects on the proliferative response and cytokine production profiles of lymphocytes. The results provide evidence for the complexity of the underlying processes by which decreasing photoperiod in the late summer and fall bolster immune system defense mechanisms in anticipation of the increased level of physiological stress and greater morbidity and mortality risks encountered by wild populations of rodents during the winter months.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We would like to thank Dr. Lewis VanBrackle (Department of Mathematics, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA) for his help with the statistical analysis of the present data.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by NIH grants GM08248, RR03024, and HD41749. Back

2 Correspondence: David R. Mann, Cooperative Reproductive Science Research Center, Morehouse School of Medicine, 720 Westview Drive SW, Atlanta, GA 30310. FAX: 404 752 1056; mann{at}msm.edu Back

Received: 8 January 2003.

First decision: 13 January 2003.

Accepted: 3 February 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Bronson FH, Heideman PD. Seasonal regulation of reproduction in mammals. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds.), The Physiology of Reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1994:541–583
  2. Moffatt CA, DeVries AC, Nelson RJ. Winter adaptations of male deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) that vary in reproductive responsiveness to photoperiod. J Biol Rhythms 1993 8:221-232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Nelson RJ, Demas GE, Klein SL, Kriegsfeld LJ. The influence of season, photoperiod, and pineal melatonin on immune function. J Pineal Res 1995 19:149-165[Medline]
  4. Riddle O. Sex and seasonal differences in weight of liver and spleen. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1928 25:474-476
  5. Hohn EO. Seasonal cyclic changes in the thymus of the mallard. J Exp Biol 1947 24:184-191[Medline]
  6. Sealander JA, Bickerstaff LK. Seasonal changes in reticulocyte number and in relative weights of the spleen, thymus, and kidneys in the northern red-backed mouse. Can J Zool 1980 45:253-260
  7. Nelson RJ, Demas GE. Seasonal changes in immune function. Q Rev Biol 1996 71:511-548[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. John JL. The avian spleen: a neglected organ. Q Rev Biol 1994 69:327-351[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Demas GE, Klein SL, Nelson RJ. Reproductive and immune responses to photoperiod and melatonin are linked in Peromyscus subspecies. J Comp Physiol [A] 1996 179:819-825[Medline]
  10. Demas GE, Nelson RJ. Photoperiod and temperature interact to affect immune parameters in adult deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). J Biol Rhythms 1996 11:94-102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Demas GE, DeVries C, Nelson RJ. Effects of photoperiod and 2-deoxy-D-glucose metabolic stress on immune function in female deer mice. Am J Physiol 1997 272:R1762-R1767
  12. Demas GE, Nelson RJ. Short-day enhancement of immune function is independent of steroid hormones in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). J Comp Physiol [B] 1998 B168 419-426
  13. Bronson FH. The reproductive ecology of the house mouse. Q Rev Biol 1979 54:265-299[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Yellon SM, Tran LT. Photoperiod, reproduction, and immunity in select strains of inbred mice. J Biol Rhythms 2002 17:65-75[Abstract]
  15. Maestroni GJM. The immunoendocrine role of melatonin. J Pineal Res 1993 14:1-10[Medline]
  16. Guerero JM, Reiter RJ. A brief survey of pineal gland-immune system interrelationships. Endocr Res 1992 18:91-113[Medline]
  17. Auwerx J, Staels B. Leptin. Lancet 1998 351:737-742[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Zhang Y, Proenca R, Maffei M, Barone M, Leopold L, Friedman JM. Positional cloning of the mouse ob gene and its human homologue. Nature 1994 372:425-432[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Campfield LA, Smith FJ, Guisez Y, Devos R, Burn P. Recombinant mouse OB protein: evidence for a peripheral signal linking adiposity and central neural networks. Science 1995 269:546-549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Halaas JL, Gajiwala KS, Maffei M, Cohen SL, Chait BT, Rabinowitz D, Lallone RL, Burley SK, Friedman JM. Weight-reducing effects of the plasma protein encoded by the obese gene. Science 1995 269:543-546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Gainsford T, Wilson TA, Metcalf E, Handman C, McFarlane C, Ng A, Nicola NA, Alexander WS, Hilton DJ. Leptin can induce proliferation, differentiation, and functional activation of hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996 93:14564-14568[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Siegrist-Kaiser CA, Pauli V, Juge-Aubry CE, Boss O, Pernin A, Chin WW, Cusin I, Rohner-Jeanrenaud F, Burger AG, Zapf J. Direct effects of leptin on brown and white adipose tissue. J Clin Invest 1997 100:2858-2864[Medline]
  23. Matarese G. Leptin and immune system: how nutritional status influences the immune response. Eur Cytokine Netw 2000 11:7-14[Medline]
  24. Fantuzzi G, Faggioni R. Leptin in the regulation of immunity, inflammation, and hematopoiesis. J Leukoc Biol 2000 68:437-446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Martin-Romero C, Santos-Alvarez J, Goberna R, Sanchez-Margalet V. Human leptin enhances activation and proliferation of human circulating T lymphocytes. Cell Immunol 2000 199:15-24[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Chandra RK. Cell-mediated immunity in genetically obese (C57BL/6J ob/ob) mice. Am J Clin Nutr 1980 53:1087-1101
  27. Ferandes G, Handwerger BS, Yunis EJ, Brown DM. Immune response in the mutant diabetic C57 BL/ks-db+ mouse. J Clin Invest 1978 61:243-250
  28. Cason J, Ainley CC, Wolstencroft RA, Norton KR, Thompson RP. Cell-mediated immunity in anorexia nervosa. Clin Exp Immunol 1986 64:370-375[Medline]
  29. Chandra RK. Nutrition and immunity: lessons from the past and new insights in to the future. Am J Clin Nutr 1991 53:1087-1101[Free Full Text]
  30. Lord GM, Matarese G, Howard JK, Baker RJ, Bloom SR, Lechler RI. Leptin modulates the T-cell immune response and reverses starvation-induced immunosuppression. Nature 1998 394:897-901[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Bartness TJ, Demas GE, Song CK. Seasonal changes in adiposity: the roles of the photoperiod, melatonin and other hormones, and sympathetic nervous system. Exp Biol Med 2002 227:363-376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Mann DR, Lunn SF, Akinbami MA, Samuel K, Waterfall M, Fraser HM. Effect of neonatal treatment with a GnRH antagonist on development of the cell-mediated immune response in marmosets. Am J Reprod Immunol 1999 42:175-186
  33. Zhang F, Basinki MB, Beals JM, Briggs SL, Churgay LM, Clawson DK, DiMarchi RD, Furman TC, Hale JE, Hsiung HM, Schoner BE, Smith DP, Zhang XY, Wery TP, Schevitz RW. Crystal structure of the obese protein leptin-E100. Nature 1997 387:206-209[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Buso N, So A, Chobaz-Peclat V, Morard C, Martinez-Soria E, Talabot-Ayer D, Gabay C. Leptin signaling deficiency impairs humoral and cellular immune responses and attenuates experimental arthritis. J Immunol 2002 168:875-882[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Grunfeld C, Zhao C, Fuller J, Pollack A, Moser A, Friedman J, Feingold KR. Endotoxin and cytokines induce expression of leptin, the ob gene product, in hamsters. A role for leptin in the anorexia of infection. J Clin Invest 1996 97:2152-2157[Medline]
  36. Saraaf P, Frederich RC, Turner EM, Ma G, Jaskowiak NT, Rivet DJ, Flier JS, Lowell BB, Fraker DL, Alexander HR. Multiple cytokines and acute inflammation raise mouse leptin levels: potential role in inflammatory anorexia. J Exp Med 1997 185:171-175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Howard JK, Lord GM, Matarese G, Vendetti S, Ghatei MA, Ritter MA, Lechler RI, Bloom SR. Leptin protects mice from starvation-induced lymphoid atrophy and increases thymic cellularity in ob/ob mice. J Clin Invest 1999 104:1051-1059[Medline]
  38. Loffreda S, Yang SQ, Lin HZ, Karp CL, Brengman ML, Wang DJ, Klein AS, Bulkey GB, Bao C, Noble PW, Lane MD, Diehl AM. Leptin regulates proinflammatory immune responses. FASEB J 1998 12:57-65[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Yellon SM, Fagoaga OR, Nehlsen-Cannarella SL. Influence of photoperiod on immune cell functions in the male Siberian hamster. Am J Physiol 1999 276:R97-R102
  40. Drazen DL, Kriegsfeld LJ, Schneider JE, Nelson RJ. Leptin, but not immune function, is linked to reproductive responsiveness to photoperiod. Am J Physiol 2000 278:R1401-R1407
  41. Demas GE, Nelson RJ. Exogenous melatonin enhances cell-mediated, but not humoral, immune function in adult male deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). J Biol Rhythms 1998 13:245-252[Abstract]
  42. Grossman CJ. Regulation of the immune system by sex steroids. Endocr Rev 1984 5:435-455[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Barash IA, Cheung CC, Weigle DS, Ren H, Kabigting EB, Kuijper JL, Clifton DK, Steiner RB. Leptin is a metabolic signal to the reproductive system. Endocrinology 1996 137:3144-3147[Abstract]
  44. Mounzih K, Lu R, Chehab FF. Leptin treatment rescues the sterility of genetically obese ob/ob males. Endocrinology 1997 138:1190-1193[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Meng X, Akutsu H, Schoene K, Reifsteck C, Fox EP, Olson S, Sariola H, Yanagimachi R, Baetscher M. Transgene insertion induced dominant male sterility and rescue of male sterility using round spermatid injection. Biol Reprod 2002 66:726-734[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
G. K. Bhat, T. L. Sea, M. O. Olatinwo, D. Simorangkir, G. D. Ford, B. D. Ford, and D. R. Mann
Influence of a Leptin Deficiency on Testicular Morphology, Germ Cell Apoptosis, and Expression Levels of Apoptosis-Related Genes in the Mouse
J Androl, March 1, 2006; 27(2): 302 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
69/1/30    most recent
biolreprod.103.015347v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhat, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhat, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bhat, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, D. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS