Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agca, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agca, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Agca, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Biology of Reproduction 67, 1493-1501 (2002)
© 2002 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Osmotic Characteristics of Mouse Spermatozoa in the Presence of Extenders and Sugars1

Yuksel Agcaa, Julie Gilmoreb, Michael Byersb, Erik J. Woodsb, Jun Liua, and John K. Critser2,a

a Comparative Medicine Center, Research Animal Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211 b Cryobiology Research Institute, Wells Research Center, Indiana University Medical School, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Successful cryopreservation requires cells to tolerate volume excursions experienced during permeating cryoprotectant equilibration and during cooling and warming. However, prior studies have demonstrated that mouse spermatozoa are extremely sensitive to osmotically induced volume changes. A series of three experiments were conducted 1) to test the efficacy of two commonly used extender media components, egg yolk (EY) and skim milk (SM), in broadening the osmotic tolerance limits (OTL) of ICR and B6C3F1 murine spermatozoa; 2) to determine if the extender components affected sperm plasma membrane permeability coefficients for water and cryoprotective agent (CPA) characteristics; and 3) to test the effects of permeating and nonpermeating CPA on mouse sperm morphology. In experiment 1, sperm samples were added to 150, 225, 300, 450, or 600 mOsm NaCl, EY, SM, sucrose, or choline chloride at 22°C and then returned to isosmotic conditions. In experiment 2, epididymal sperm were preequilibrated in 1 M glycerol (Gly) or 2 M ethylene glycol (EG) prepared in SM extender, abruptly exposed to isosmotic conditions at 22, 15, or 2°C, and the corresponding volume excursions were measured and analyzed. In experiment 3, the effects of permeating CPA (0.3 M EG or dimethyl sulfoxide) or nonpermeating CPA (12% sucrose or 18% raffinose) on sperm morphology (i.e., principle midpiece folding and putative membrane fusion) were evaluated. Experiment 1 showed that spermatozoa from ICR and B6C3F1 mice have effectively broader OTL when exposed to EY or SM extenders. The results of experiment 2 indicated that, for ICR sperm, the activation energy (Ea) for the hydraulic conductivity (Lp) was unchanged in SM extender. However, for B6C3F1 sperm, there were significant differences in Ea of Lp in the presence of Gly and EG. The result of experiment 3 indicated that permeating CPAs damage sperm membrane integrity, causing a high frequency of head-to-tail or tail-to-tail membrane fusion, whereas this occurrence in the presence of nonpermeating CPA was less than 3%. Finally, the results of experiments 1 and 2 were combined in a mathematical model to predict Gly and EG addition and removal in the presence of SM extender, which would prevent mouse sperm membrane damage. These predictions indicated that, for ICR sperm, both Gly and EG may be added and removed in a single step. However, for B6C3F1 spermatozoa, Gly required a two-step addition while EG only required a single step. For removal from B6C3F1 sperm, Gly required a three-step removal process while EG required a two-step removal.

gamete biology


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The number of genetically engineered strains of mice is increasing at an exponential rate, creating a critical need for improved, cost effective methods to store and archive these mouse strains [1, 2]. Because use of cryopreserved spermatozoa would provide such a method, there is a critical need to develop reliable and cost-effective means of sperm cryopreservation. However, previous attempts to effectively cryopreserve mouse sperm have indicated that this is a very enigmatic area of gamete cryobiology due to significant variation in the response to the same cryopreservation protocols among mouse lines. Thornton [3] and Nakagata [4] have presented excellent reviews of mouse sperm cryopreservation attempts performed during the last decade, which well document this. Although success with mouse spermatozoa cryopreservation was first reported in 1990 [5, 6], the fundamental cryobiological factors that affect the ability of spermatozoa to participate in fertilization after freezing and thawing remains largely unknown. In addition, some laboratories have had difficulty repeating published freezing protocols [7, 8]. There have also been reports of strain-to-strain variability with respect to given protocols [9] in that a given procedure may work well for one strain and not at all for another.

Freezing protocols developed for certain cell types should be reliable and repeatable. It is our thesis that an improved understanding of fundamental cryobiological properties of murine spermatozoa is required to establish optimal freezing protocols that could be employed for all strains of mice. Therefore, it is critical to assess multiple levels of biological function when designing and optimizing cryopreservation protocols. Cells are exposed to multiple nonphysiological steps during the cryopreservation process in which they experience osmotically driven volume excursions. During permeating cryoprotective agent (CPA) addition, cells initially shrink as water flows out of the cell, and subsequently, the cell swells as water and CPA enter. The reverse process occurs during CPA removal. Superimposed on this aspect of cryopreservation is the issue that different cell types and even the same cell type among different species have different tolerances in response to these osmotically driven changes in their cell volume [10]. Discrete osmotic tolerance limits (OTL) have been determined for mouse spermatozoa [11], and the results suggest that these cells have an exquisitely narrow tolerance to such changes. These limits are so narrow that, when using even moderate concentrations of permeating CPA (e.g., 0.5 M glycerol [Gly]), maintenance of as little as 50% of the original motility requires very slow addition and removal of the CPA [12]. However, using low concentrations of CPA leaves the cells vulnerable to solute damage during cooling and warming [13].

Previous investigations have suggested that various non-membrane-permeable components used in extender media have cryoprotective affects on spermatozoa during cryobiological processing, but their mechanism(s) of action are largely unknown. These non-membrane-permeable extender components include chicken egg yolk (EY) [14], sugars [5, 15], and skim milk (SM) [16]. Therefore, one of the first goals of this study was to test the hypothesis that these components protect mouse spermatozoa during cryopreservation by broadening the plasma membrane OTL, thus allowing the cells to better endure the osmotically driven volume excursions during cryopreservation.

Additionally, previous studies have shown changes in membrane permeability characteristics upon exposure to CPAs, including significant reduction of the hydraulic conductivity (Lp) and an increase in the associated activation energy (Ea) of Lp in human and boar spermatozoa [17, 18] as well as a significant reduction of the Lp in murine spermatozoa upon exposure to Percoll separation gradients. Therefore, the second objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the extender components would have an effect on murine spermatozoa permeability characteristics, specifically the Lp, CPA membrane permeability coefficient (PCPA), the reflection coefficient ({sigma}), and the associated Ea for each of these parameters. We also aimed to use the information gained in experiments 1 and 2 to theoretically predict a nondamaging method for the addition and removal of adequate concentrations of permeating CPAs while maintaining the cell volume within the OTL and thus provide critical information for the development of an improved mouse spermatozoa cryopreservation procedure.

Noiles et al. [19] suggested that mouse spermatozoa display no indication of swelling when examined under the microscope in hyposmotic media; they have thus proposed a low-amplitude swelling model to describe the osmometric behavior of mouse spermatozoa. According to this model, mouse spermatozoa swell to a very small extent in response to the osmotic difference across their semipermeable membranes due to resistance to stretching. As the osmotic difference increases, a critical pressure difference is reached at which point the cell lyses. As a result of this swelling, two regions of the plasma membrane come into contact, resulting in membrane fusion. In mouse spermatozoa, due to their extreme length relative to other mammalian spermatozoa, as a result of lysis, the tail tends to fuse with the midpiece or with other parts of the tail, causing irreversible bends or loops to form. This membrane fusion causes an irreversible loss of motility [11]. Therefore, a third experiment was conducted to determine the effects of permeating CPA (ethylene glycol [EG] and dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]) as well as nonpermeating CPA (sucrose and raffinose), combined with tests of mixtures of the two. This experiment tested the hypothesis that the morphology of mouse spermatozoa is more sensitive to permeating CPAs than nonpermeating CPAs, looking at percent membrane fusion with varying mixtures of permeating and nonpermeating CPAs.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Media

All chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO), unless otherwise stated. The extender stock medium consisted of either 1) 3% SM and 0.19 M (~6%) sucrose dissolved in distilled water to yield an isotonic solution (final osmolality 300 mOsm/kg), or 2) commercially obtained TEST Egg Yolk Buffer (Irvine Scientific, Santa Anna, CA). The 3% SM (skim milk dehydrated, Bacto Difco; Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA) was dissolved in culture grade milli-Q water and centrifuged for 15 min at 12 000 x g in a microcentrifuge (Eppendorf; Model 5415). The supernatant was removed and filtered through a 0.45-µm acrodisc (Gelman Sciences Inc., Ann Arbor, MI). The CPA solutions were prepared by mixing the stock solutions with either Gly or EG to yield 1 M Gly and 2 M EG (2 M EG was used due to its rapid permeation, i.e., the cell volumetric response associated with 1 M EG removal was too rapid to measure accurately. Milli-Q water was added to 10x PBS to make an isotonic working solution for Coulter counter experiments.

Spermatozoa Collection and Processing

Male outbred ICR and hybrid B6C3F1 mice (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Indianapolis, IN) between 8 and 20 wk of age were used for the experiments. Mice were killed by cervical dislocation. The cauda epididymides and vas deferens were excised, placed in a 35 x 10-mm Falcon dish containing 500 µl isosmotic NaCl, SM, EY (Pacific Andrology, Inc., DE, Montrose, CA), sucrose, or choline at 22°C, then stripped and minced to release spermatozoa. Samples were allowed to incubate for 5 min at 37°C and were transferred to a 15-ml conical tube yielding 1–2 ml of a spermatozoa suspension.

Osmotic Tolerance Limits of Spermatozoa in the Presence of Extender

Spermatozoa were exposed to control solutions of isosmotic (300 mOsm) NaCl as well as anisosmotic NaCl solutions (150, 225, 450, and 600 mOsm). Osmolalities were determined using a freezing-point depression osmometer (Model 3D2; Advanced Instruments, Norwood, MA) with an accuracy of ±5 mOsm. Ten microliters of spermatozoa suspension (in 0.5 ml NaCl, SM, EY, choline, or sucrose) were transferred, in a single step, into 150 µl of anisosmotic solution and mixed by gently tapping the tube [20]. Samples were then allowed to equilibrate for 5 min before subsequent manipulation. The samples were returned to near isosmotic conditions by the addition of 1500 µl of isosmotic NaCl, SM, EY, choline, or sucrose, and motility was assessed. A total of three replicates (n = 3) for each strain were used and all data were collected at 22°C. The results for each anisosmotic solution were normalized to the isosmotic value for each treatment, for each replicate, and for each strain. Data were analyzed by standard ANOVA [21] using the General Linear Models procedures of the Statistical Analysis Software Program (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Analysis of Sperm Motility and Plasma Membrane Integrity

Control sperm samples (collected in PBS) and CPA-treated sperm samples were analyzed using a Hamilton Thorn IVOS computerized semen analyzer and bright-line hemocytometer cell counting chamber. For each sample, sperm concentration (total number of cells per milliliter), motility, and progressive motility were determined. Motility was defined as the percentage of spermatozoa that showed any movement of the sperm head. Progressive motility was the percentage of spermatozoa that moved with linear velocity greater than 50 µm/sec and whose straightness, derived from the ratio of absolute straight-line velocity to average path velocity, was not less than 50%. Fresh spermatozoa (collected in CPA-containing media) were observed with a hemocytometer for percent fusion. Spermatozoa were then centrifuged (500 x g for 5 min) to increase the concentration of spermatozoa and to remove nonmotile cells. The supernatant was removed and the cells were resuspended and observed with the hemocytometer to count percent fusion. Sperm plasma membrane integrity was evaluated by using the carboxyfluorescein diacetate/propidium iodide dual fluorescence staining method using a Nikon microscope equipped with an epifluorescence system [22].

Permeability of Murine Spermatozoa in the Presence of Skim Milk Extender Using Electronic Particle Counter

An electronic particle counter (Coulter Counter ZM model; Coulter Counter Electronics, Hialeah, FL) with 50-µm high-resolution aperture tube was used to measure the volume changes of mouse spermatozoa, which had been preequilibrated with either EG or Gly prepared in SM extender following abrupt introduction into isotonic PBS solution. Only SM extender was used in this experiment because the lipid droplets in the EY buffer resulted in high electrical noise in the Coulter Counter system. The values of membrane permeability were determined using a curve-fitting calculation as previously described [17]. The Coulter Counter generates electric pulses (voltage) that are proportional to cell volume. These voltage signals were then interfaced to a microcomputer using a CSA-2S interface (Great Canadian Computer Company, AB, Canada). Cell volume changes were then determined by calibrating the signals obtained when the cells reached an equilibrium state. Approximately 100 µl of the sperm suspension was introduced into 10 ml PBS (1:100 dilution); therefore, the extracellular CPA concentration was assumed constant. In order to determine the relationship between temperature and the values of membrane permeability, the volume measurements were repeated at 22, 15, and 2°C and the corresponding cell volume changes were measured and analyzed. Temperatures below 22°C (15 and 2°C) were obtained through the use of a cooling water bath and water-jacketed beaker. Filtered media, vials, and the Coulter Counter aperture tube were all cooled to the desired temperature before the start of the experiment.

Estimation of Membrane Permeability Coefficients> for Lp, PCPA, and Activation Energies

A pair of coupled nonlinear equations introduced by Kedem and Katchalsky [23] was used to describe the change rates of cell volume and intracellular CPA concentration. The cell volume and amount of intracellular solute concentration as functions of time can be presented as

and

where V is cell volume, A is surface area, is the molal concentration of CPA inside the cell, and

The superscripts i and e refer to the intra- and extracellular cell compartments, s is solute, and n is salt, respectively. The terms Lp, PCPA, and {sigma} are parameters for the hydraulic conductivity of water (in the presence of CPA), the permeability coefficient of the CPA, and the reflection coefficient, respectively. The temperature and universal gas constant are given by T and R, respectively. In this study, nonideal solution effects were ignored. For the impermeable solute (NaCl), the intracellular osmolality of NaCl is given by

where Vb is the osmotically inactive cell volume and Vs = s is the CPA volume (s is the partial molar volume of the CPA). The superscript (0) represents the initial values at t = 0. The values for Lp, PCPA, and {sigma} were determined. A fixed value for Vb (61% isotonic cell volume [11]) was used in the analysis.

The Arrhenius relationship was used to determine the Ea of the parameters LpCPA and PCPA [24]. The permeability value (LpCPA or PCPA) at any temperature T can be plotted as ln[Pa(T)] vs. 1/T (Arrhenius plot), i.e.,

where Ea for the process is expressed in Kcal/mole. The slope of the plot is defined as

(5)
from which Ea can be determined.

Theory of Optimal CPA Addition and Dilution

Methods for optimal permeating CPA addition and removal are defined here as the processes that minimize the number of addition and dilution steps while maintaining cells within their respective OTL. Theoretical considerations for this procedure are previously described by Gilmore et al. [25]. Briefly, computer simulations were performed to predict optimal CPA additions and removal procedures from mouse spermatozoa. Under the given experimental conditions (initial intracellular concentration, upper and lower OTL of the cell, and temperature), the program optimizes the addition and dilution steps automatically and provides the appropriate diluent concentration.

Morphology of Murine Spermatozoa in the Presence of Permeating and Nonpermeating CPA

In this experiment, only ICR mice were used. Sperm samples were suspended directly in permeating or nonpermeating CPA solution, gently stirred for 30 sec, and then placed in an incubator for 15 min before observation. The cryoprotectant solutions were prepared using 3% SM as the buffer or extender in which all of the CPAs were tested. Sperm samples were centrifuged at 500 x g for 5 min in order to increase concentrations and were analyzed before and after centrifugation for evaluating percent fusion using a hemocytometer. The CPAs used in the study were permeating (0.3 M Gly, DMSO, or EG), nonpermeating (12% sucrose and 18% raffinose), or combinations of equal molar concentrations of permeating and nonpermeating CPA (e.g., DMSO + raffinose, EG + raffinose, DMSO + sucrose, EG + sucrose, Gly + sucrose, and Gly + raffinose). All sugars and polyols that were tested in this experiment were dissolved in a 3% SM solution at a final concentration of 0.3 M. All SM solutions containing CPAs had a final osmolality between 300 and 420 mOsm.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Experiment 1: Osmotic Tolerance Limits of Murine Spermatozoa in the Presence of Skim Milk, Egg Yolk, Choline, or Sucrose

Spermatozoa from ICR and B6C3F1 mice were extended in isosmotic NaCl, SM, EY, choline, or sucrose, and aliquots were randomly assigned to treatment solutions in concentrations ranging from 150 to 600 mOsm. Motility estimates were determined after cells were returned to isosmotic conditions. Both B6C3F1 and ICR sperm motilities were significantly higher (P < 0.05) when the cells were extended in SM or EY than those extended in NaCl (Fig. 1). ICR spermatozoa have significantly higher (P < 0.05) motility when extended in EY or SM than cells from B6C3F1 mice (Fig. 2). Results also indicate that spermatozoa from both ICR and B6C3F1 that were exposed to choline have significantly lower (P < 0.05) percent motilities than those extended in sucrose or NaCl (Fig. 3).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. A comparison of normalized B6C3F1 or ICR mouse motility (mean ± SEM; n = 3) after a 5-min exposure to various hypo- and hyperosmotic solutions of NaCl, skim milk, or egg yolk and returning to isosmotic conditions



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. A comparison of normalized B6C3F1 or ICR spermatozoa motility (mean ± SEM; n = 3) after a 5-min exposure to various hypo- and hyperosmotic solutions of egg yolk or skim milk and returning to isosmotic conditions



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. A comparison of normalized ICR or B6C3F1 spermatozoa motility (mean ± SEM; n = 3) extended in various hypo- and hyperosmotic NaCl, sucrose, or choline solutions for 5-min and returning to isosmotic conditions

Experiment 2: Permeability of Murine Spermatozoa in the Presence of Skim Milk Extender

The values of LpCPA, PCPA, and {sigma} are shown in Tables 1 and 2 (ICR and B6C3F1 mice). At 22°C, spermatozoa from B6C3F1 mice had the highest LpCPA and PCPA in the presence of EG. In the presence of Gly, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the values of LpCPA and PCPA between strains. The type of CPA used and temperature had significant effects (P < 0.05) on the LpCPA and value PCPA in both strains. For ICR mice, the Ea for Lp in Gly and in EG were determined as 9.65 (r2 = 0.90) and 8.98 (r2 = 0.99) Kcal/mol, respectively. The Ea for PCPA in Gly and EG were determined as 12.84 (r2 = 0.96) and 10.55 (r2 = 0.96) Kcal/mol, respectively (Fig. 4). For B6C3F1 mice, the Ea for Lp in Gly and EG were determined as 8.34 (r2 = 0.99) and 16.65 (r2 = 0.91) Kcal/mol, respectively. The Ea for PCPA in Gly and EG were determined as 12.42 (r2 = 0.99) and 18.69 (r2 = 0.99) Kcal/mol, respectively (Fig. 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Value of Lp, PCPA, and {sigma} for ICR mouse sperm at different temperatures


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Value of Lp, PCPA, and {sigma} for B6C3F1 mouse sperm at different temperatures



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Arrhenius plot of Lp and PCPA for ICR spermatozoa in the presence of glycerol or EG used to calculate Ea for these parameters. Arrhenius plot of Lp and PCPA for B6C3F1 mouse spermatozoa in the presence of glycerol or EG used to calculate Ea for these parameters. Solid circle, Lp; open circle, PCPA

Addition and Removal of CPAs in Extender Media

Based on the information gained from experiments 1 and 2, theoretical models were employed to predict the response of ICR and B6C3F1 mouse spermatozoa to the addition and removal of Gly or EG in the presence of SM extender. The results suggest that, for ICR spermatozoa in the presence of SM extender, both Gly and EG can simply be added and removed using one step (Figs. 5 and 6). On the other hand, for B6C3F1 spermatozoa, Gly required a two-step addition while EG only required a single step (Fig. 5). For removal from B6C3F1 sperm, Gly required a three-step removal process while EG required a two-step removal (Fig. 6).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Theoretical simulation for the volume excursion following a single-step introduction of EG or two-step introduction of glycerol for ICR and B6C3F1 spermatozoa at 22°C



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Theoretical simulation for the volume excursion following a single-step dilution of glycerol or EG for ICR spermatozoa in the presence of skim milk extender at 22°C (upper panel) and also the theoretical simulation for the volume excursion following a two- and three-step dilution of EG or glycerol for B6C3F1 spermatozoa in the presence of skim milk extender, respectively (lower panel)

Experiment 3: Morphology Effects of Murine Spermatozoa in the Presence of Permeating and Nonpermeating CPA

Centrifugation of ICR sperm in SD-PBS using 500 x g force for 5 min did not have a significant effect (P > 0.05) on membrane fusion rate (1.77% ± 0.27% [mean ± SEM] and 2.68% ± 0.40% before and after centrifugation, respectively). The percent of spermatozoa observed to be nonlinear varied with the composition of the CPA in which they were collected. Sperm samples that were collected in Gly (46.88% ± 1.39%), EG (20.90% ± 1.27%), and DMSO (36.23% ± 2.82%) showed more fusion than sperm collected in sucrose (2.31% ± 0.22%) and raffinose (2.74% ± 0.19%) after centrifugation (Fig. 7) (P < 0.05). Although the percentage of sperm with nonlinear morphology obtained from the permeating CPAs was significant, Gly, the most widely used CPA, showed the highest percent of membrane fusion (P < 0.05). Sucrose slightly (although not statistically significant) resulted in a lower fusion rate than raffinose (P > 0.05) (Fig. 7). The results depicted in Figure 8 show that, when combining equal molar concentrations of permeating and nonpermeating CPAs, significantly less fusion (P < 0.05) occurs. Figure 9 represents light and fluorescent microscopic images of head-to-tail fused sperm collected in 0.3 M EG.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Percentage of spermatozoa with nonlinear morphology after incubating them in either 0.3 M permeating CPAs (Gly, EG, or DMSO) or nonpermeating CPAs (12% sucrose or 18% raffinose) for 15 min and returning to isosmotic condition. Spermatozoa were observed and analyzed before and after centrifugation using 500 x g force for 5 min



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Percentage of spermatozoa with nonlinear morphology after incubating them in 0.3 M glycerol (+ 12% sucrose, raffinose), EG (+ sucrose, raffinose), DMSO (+ sucrose, raffinose) (before and after centrifugation)



View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9. Light (A) and fluorescence (B) microscopy images of head-to-tail fused mouse sperm exposed to 0.3 M ethylene glycol


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Recently, EY and particularly SM have become commonly used compounds of mouse sperm freezing media at a concentration of 3% (plus other nonpermeating compounds such as raffinose, trehalose, and sucrose). In contradiction to most standard cryopreservation methods, the most successful mouse sperm survival after cryopreservation has been achieved by using these extender components without the inclusion of permeating CPAs such as Gly. However, these empirically derived protocols have inadvertently moved these procedures into an important cryobiologic predicament since these protocols provide no protection against the high intracellular solute concentration that develops during freezing.

Permeating CPAs are known to protect cells during freezing via colligative action by minimizing the concentration of electrolytes and other solutes during freezing [26]. This principle has been well accepted and applied in almost all mammalian cell cryopreservation methods. However, the approach recently taken by several investigators toward mouse sperm cryopreservation suggests that permeating CPAs are not required for success. In fact, some reports have indicated that the inclusion of permeating CPAs actually caused marked reduction in mouse sperm survival after freezing and thawing. This is a fundamentally critical issue because very few cell types can be successfully cryopreserved in the absence of permeating CPAs and the fact that, to date, most attempts to cryopreserve mouse sperm have met with very limited success. Therefore, in order to develop improved mouse sperm cryopreservation methods, it is essential to gain an understanding of why permeating CPAs adversely affect mouse sperm viability. This information can be used to develop methods to prevent the adverse effects and allow these compounds to be used to prevent solute damage during freezing. In this regard, there is a need for a systematic examination to reveal each of those compounds' concentration-dependent beneficial or detrimental effects during each step of the freezing procedure such as CPA addition and removal, cooling, freezing, and warming [27].

Because they are nonpermeating solutes, the addition of sugars to media causes a concentration-dependent increase in osmolality resulting in dehydration of cells within the solution. This dehydration causes a proportional increase in the intracellular solute concentration, which in turn facilitates intracellular vitrification during cooling [28]. In addition, sugars provide an osmotic buffer that prevents excessive cell volume excursion during cryopreservation procedures [29]. The beneficial effects of SM and EY as membrane stabilizers during cooling have long been known, although mechanisms of action by which they protect the cell are still largely unknown [30, 31]. Over the past several years, our group has conducted extensive studies that have examined the low survival and the variability in success rates among various genetic backgrounds [2]. In the current study, we examined the effects of permeating and nonpermeating compounds on permeability characteristics and morphologic changes with the goal of enabling the use of permeating CPAs in standard procedures.

Osmotic Tolerance of Murine Spermatozoa in the Presence of Skim Milk Extender

During the cryopreservation process, cells are exposed to multiple steps in which they experience extensive volume excursions, which can be damaging to cells [8]. It has been previously shown that mouse spermatozoa are particularly sensitive to osmotically driven changes in cell volume and there is a genetic basis for this sensitivity of mouse spermatozoa to osmotic shock [9, 7]. Therefore, by broadening the OTL for mouse sperm, one can minimize the damage associated with volume excursions and improve cryopreservation. Prior studies have investigated the ability of extenders to protect cells during the steps of cryopreservation. One hypothesis of this study was that this could be explained by the extender's ability to expand the OTL of the cells. Certain extender media have been shown to broaden the OTL of spermatozoa from other osmotically sensitive species such as the boar [16]. Components such as EY, SM, and sugars have been commonly used media components and, more recently, choline has been observed to protect unfertilized mouse oocytes during cryopreservation [32]. Data from the current study confirmed the hypothesis that SM and EY effectively broaden the OTL of spermatozoa from ICR and B6C3F1 mice. However, effects of choline on OTL of mouse spermatozoa were unexpectedly negative. In addition, results indicate that ICR mouse spermatozoa appear to be more tolerant to osmotic change than B6C3F1 spermatozoa. On the other hand, the presence of sucrose and choline do not appear to enhance the OTL of murine spermatozoa because motilities in the presence of choline and sucrose were significantly lower than the control (NaCl).

Permeability of Murine Spermatozoa in the Presence of Skim Milk Extender

The present study shows that mouse sperm membrane LpCPA decreases in the presence of SM relative to previously reported values [10]. Muldrew and McGann [33] suggested that low permeability of a cell to water may have beneficial consequences on the degree of osmotic pressure that cells experience. If this is the case, the broader OTL of mouse sperm in the presence of SM and EY extender in the current study supports this early hypothesis. Values of Ea with or without SM extender are listed in Table 3. For ICR spermatozoa, Ea remained fairly consistent with or without SM extender. For B6C3F1, relatively larger changes were found in Ea of Lp in the presence of Gly and EG. As indicated by the Arrhenius plots of B6C3F1 sperm cells without SM extender [10], values of Ea deviated from a normal Arrhenius relationship at 15 and 1.5°C. In other words, in both Gly and EG, Ea of Lp and PCPA had larger values at 1.5°C than those at 15°C. In that study, this was explained as a potential lipid-phase transition in the plasma membrane occurring at these temperatures. In the present study, however, values of Ea followed a normal Arrhenius relationship at 15 and 1.5°C, with r2 values close to one (Fig. 4). If the phase transition of lipid in the plasma membrane is the actual reason for deviation at 15 and 1.5°C, SM extender may suppress this phenomenon.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Hydraulic conductivity (Lp; µm/min/atm), CPA permeability (PCPA; cm/sec), and their associated activation energies (Ea; Kcal/mol) for ICR or B6C3F1 mouse sperm in the presence of and in the absence of skim milk extender

Optimal Addition and Removal of CPAs> in Extender Media

It has been suggested that osmotic damage caused by permeating CPAs can be minimized by adding and removing them in a manner that maintains cells within their OTL. The importance of appropriate CPA addition and removal procedures becomes apparent because there have been large numbers of reports that suggest extreme sensitivity of mouse spermatozoa to osmotic changes and handling such as pipetting and centrifugation [9, 34]. In this study, it was demonstrated that SM extender has a positive effect on mouse sperm survival. Combining the permeability measurements determined following exposure to the SM extender, theoretical models were employed to predict the response of mouse spermatozoa to the addition and removal of 1 M Gly or EG. According to the theoretical data, for ICR spermatozoa in the presence of SM extender, both Gly and EG (final concentration of 1 M) may be safely added and removed in a single step. On the other hand, Katkov et al. [35] have found that addition of 0.8 M Gly in the absence of SM required a multistep addition approach for ICR mice. However, in this study, due to the lower OTL of B6C3F1 spermatozoa, 1 M Gly required a two-step addition while 1 M EG only required a single step. For removal from B6C3F1 sperm, Gly required a three-step removal process while EG required a two-step removal. This is in sharp contrast with a similar study [10] in which the same types of simulations were performed in the absence of extender media. In that study, for ICR spermatozoa, a two-step addition process was required for both addition and removal of either Gly or EG, and for B6C3F1 spermatozoa, a three-step process was needed for Gly and a four-step process was needed for EG. Removal of either CPA was predicted to require three-steps. This data confirms that expansion of the OTL by SM allows an easier and more effective approach to mouse sperm cryopreservation.

Morphology Effects of Murine Spermatozoa in the Presence of Permeating and Nonpermeating CPA

Standard mammalian sperm cryopreservation protocols have typically used permeating CPAs (e.g., Gly, EG). However, to date, permeating CPAs have not been effective with mouse spermatozoa and have even been reported to be detrimental in some cases [35]. In the present study, it has been shown that, when ICR sperm were placed into various sugars or glycols at 0.3 M concentration in 3% SM under the same conditions, the number of sperm that survived incubation without membrane fusion and subsequent lysis in permeating additives was reduced in comparison with the samples placed in nonpermeating sugars. In this study, when mouse sperm were placed in sucrose or raffinose, no significant effect was shown in the frequency of membrane fusion (2.31% and 2.74%, respectively, after centrifugation), whereas mouse sperm placed in Gly, EG, or DMSO showed 46.88%, 20.90%, and 36.23% fusion after centrifugation, respectively. This finding is consistent with an early study that compared postthaw motility of CB6F1 (hybrid) and C57BL/6J (inbred) mouse sperm after exposing them to the same sugars and permeating CPAs (Gly, DMSO) at comparable concentrations (400 mOsm), resulting in a significantly higher postthaw motility (about 60%) than nonpermeating CPAs (less than 43%) [36]. These results led us to further investigate if this detrimental membrane fusion effect could be suppressed by combining equal molar concentrations of nonpermeating and permeating CPAs. The Gly, EG, and DMSO additives, when combined with sucrose and raffinose, showed very low membrane fusion (5.61%, 5.47%, 4.15%, 5.39%, 3.67%, and 5.62%, respectively) after centrifugation. On the contrary, a very early study by Tada et al. [5] reported that mouse sperm frozen in 18% raffinose alone showed 40% postthaw motility, while sperm frozen in a combination of permeating and nonpermeating CPAs (18% raffinose + 1.75 M Gly) had a postthaw motility of 60%. At this point, it is clear that more research on the use of nonpermeating compounds or possible combinations for mouse sperm freezing is necessary. This will increase our understanding of freezing differences in effective mouse sperm preservation protocols.

In conclusion, the current study determined that EY and SM extender media broadens the OTL of mouse spermatozoa. In addition, SM extender alters the membrane permeability characteristics, including the associated temperature dependence of these characteristics. Based on these results, new CPA addition and removal procedures have been predicted that are more efficient and allow a greater concentration of permeating CPAs to be used with less damage, potentially improving cryopreservation outcomes. Ongoing work is directed toward testing this hypothesis.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 This work was supported by the Cryobiology Research Institute and grants from the NIH (R24-RR13194 and U42 RR14821). Back

2 Correspondence: John K. Critser, Comparative Medicine Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, 1600 East Rollins Street, Room E-109, Columbia, MO 65211. FAX: 573 884 7521; critserj{at}missouri.edu Back

Received: 14 March 2002.

First decision: 25 April 2002.

Accepted: 24 May 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Sharp JJ, Mobraten LE. To save or not to save: the role of repositories in a period of rapidly expanding development of genetically engineered strains of mice. In: Houdebine LM (ed.), Transgenic Animals: Generation and Use. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1997: 525–532.
  2. Critser JK, Mobraaten LE. Cryopreservation of murine spermatozoa. Inst Lab Anim Res J 2000 41:197-206
  3. Thornton C. Large numbers of mice established by in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved spermatozoa: implications and applications for genetic resource banks, mutagenesis screens, and mouse backcrosses. Mamm Genome 1999 10:987-992[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Nakagata N. Cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa. Mamm Genome 2000 11:572-576[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Tada N, Sato M, Yamonoi J, Mizorgi T, Kasai K, Ogawa S. Cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa in the presence of raffinose and glycerol. J Reprod Fertil 1990 89:511-516[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Yokoyama M, Akiba H, Katsuki M, Nomura T. Production of normal young following transfer of mouse embryos obtained by in vitro fertilization using cryopreserved spermatozoa. Exp Anim 1990 39:125-128
  7. Penfold LM, Moore HDM. A new method for cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1993 99:131-134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Fuller SJ, Whittingham DG. Effect of cooling mouse spermatozoa to 4°C on fertilization and embryonic development. J Reprod Fertil 1996 108:139-145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Songsasen N, Leibo SP. Cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa. II. Relationship between survival after cryopreservation and osmotic tolerance of spermatozoa from three strains of mice. Cryobiology 1997 35:240-254[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Gao DY, Liu J, Liu C, McGann LE, Watson PF, Kleinhans FW, Mazur P, Critser ES, Critser JK. Prevention of osmotic injury to human spermatozoa during addition and removal of glycerol. Hum Reprod 1995 10:1109-1122[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Willoughby CE, Mazur P, Peter AT, Critser JK. Osmotic tolerance limits and properties of murine spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1996 55:715-727[Abstract]
  12. Phelps MJ, Liu J, Benson JD, Willoughby CE, Gilmore JA, Critser JK. Effects of Percoll separation, cryoprotective agents, and temperature on plasma membrane permeability characteristics of murine spermatozoa and their relevance to cryopreservation. Biol Reprod 1999 61:1031-1041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Mazur P. Freezing of living cells: mechanisms and implications. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 1984 16:C125-C142
  14. Watson PF. The preservation of semen in mammals. In: Finn CA (ed.), Oxford Reviews of Reproductive Biology. London: Oxford University Press; 1979: 283–350
  15. Tao J, Du J, Kleinhans FW, Critser ES, Mazur P, Critser JK. The effect of collection temperature, cooling rate and warming rate on chilling injury and cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1995 104:231-236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Justice MJ, Stech ME, Bode VC. Successful artificial insemination from mouse sperm cryopreserved in skim milk medium. Cryobiology 1996 33:679
  17. Gilmore JA, McGann LE, Liu J, Gao DY, Peter AT, Kleinhans FW, Critser JK. Effect of cryoprotectant solutes on water permeability of human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1995 53:985-995[Abstract]
  18. Gilmore JA, Liu J, Peter AT, Critser JK. Determination of plasma membrane characteristics of boar spermatozoa and their relevance to cryopreservation. Biol Reprod 1998 58:28-36[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Noiles EE, Mazur P, Watson PF, Kleinhaus FW, Critser JK. Determination of water permeability coefficient of human spermatozoa and its activation energy. Biol Reprod 1993 48:99-109[Abstract]
  20. Mazur P II, Katkov PD, Schrueders PD, Critser JK. Influence of mechanical sensitivity, glycerol concentration and oxygen concentration on the cryopreservation of mouse sperm: background. In: Abstracts of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Society for Cryobiology; 1998; Pittsburgh, PA. Cryobiology 37: 414
  21. Zar JH. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1984: 718
  22. Tao J, Critser ES, Critser JK. Evaluation of mouse sperm acrosomal status and viability by flow cytometry. Mol Reprod Dev 1993 36:183-194[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Kedem O, Katchalsky A. Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to nonelectrolytes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1958 27:229-246[Medline]
  24. Levin RL, Cravalho EG, Huggins CE. A membrane model describing the effect of temperature on water conductivity of erythrocyte membranes at subzero temperatures. Cryobiology 1976 13:419-429
  25. Gilmore JA, Liu J, Gao DY, Critser JK. Determination of optimal cryoprotectants and procedures for their addition and removal from human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1997 12:112-118
  26. Lovelock JE. The mechanism of protective action of glycerol against haemolysis by freezing and thawing. Biochim Biophys Acta 1953 11:28-36[Medline]
  27. Koshimoto C, Gamliel E, Mazur P. Effect of osmolality and oxygen tension on the survival of mouse sperm frozen to various temperatures in various concentrations of glycerol and raffinose. Cryobiology 2000 41:204-231[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Liu J, Woods EJ, Agca Y, Critser ES, Critser JK. Cryobiology of rat embryos II: a theoretical model for the development of interrupted slow freezing procedures. Biol Reprod 2000 63:1303-1312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Mazur P. Equilibrium and quasi-equilibrium, and non equilibrium freezing of mammalian embryos. Cell Biophys 1990 17:53-92[Medline]
  30. Foote RH. Extenders and extension of unfrozen semen. In: Salisbury GW, VanDemark NL, Lodge JR (eds.), Physiology of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination of Cattle, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Freeman; 1978: 442–493.
  31. Watson PF. Artificial insemination and the preservation of semen. In: Lamming GE (ed.), Marshall's Physiology of Reproduction, 4th ed. vol II. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1981: 747–896
  32. Stachecki JJ, Cohen J, Willadsen SM. Cryopreservation of unfertilized mouse oocytes: the effect of replacing sodium with choline in the freezing medium. Cryobiology 1998 37:346-354[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Muldrew K, McGann LE. The osmotic rupture hypothesis of intracellular freezing injury. Biophys J 1994 66:532-541[Medline]
  34. Katkov II, Mazur P. Factors affecting yield and survival of cells when suspensions are subjected to centrifugation. Influence of centrifugal acceleration, time of centrifugation, and length of the suspension column in quasi-homogeneous centrifugal fields. Cell Biochem Biophys 1999 31:231-245[Medline]
  35. Katkov II, Katkova N, Critser JK, Mazur P. Mouse spermatozoa in high concentrations of glycerol: chemical toxicity vs osmotic shock at normal and reduced oxygen concentrations. Cryobiology 1998 37:325-338[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Sztein JM, Noble K, Farley JS, Mobraaten LE. Comparison of permeating and non permeating cryoprotectants for mouse sperm cryopreservation. Cryobiology 2001 41:28-39



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
O. Varisli, C. Uguz, C. Agca, and Y. Agca
Various Physical Stress Factors on Rat Sperm Motility, Integrity of Acrosome, and Plasma Membrane
J Androl, January 1, 2009; 30(1): 75 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T G Cooper, J P Barfield, and C H Yeung
The tonicity of murine epididymal spermatozoa and their permeability towards common cryoprotectants and epididymal osmolytes
Reproduction, May 1, 2008; 135(5): 625 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Yamauchi, A. Ajduk, J. M Riel, and M. A Ward
Ejaculated and Epididymal Mouse Spermatozoa Are Different in Their Susceptibility to Nuclease-Dependent DNA Damage and in Their Nuclease Activity
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2007; 77(4): 636 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
C. Yildiz, P. Ottaviani, N. Law, R. Ayearst, L. Liu, and C. McKerlie
Effects of cryopreservation on sperm quality, nuclear DNA integrity, in vitro fertilization, and in vitro embryo development in the mouse
Reproduction, March 1, 2007; 133(3): 585 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Ajduk, Y. Yamauchi, and M. A Ward
Sperm Chromatin Remodeling after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Differs from That of In Vitro Fertilization
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2006; 75(3): 442 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
Y. Agca, J. Liu, S. Mullen, J. Johnson-Ward, K. Gould, A. Chan, and J. Critser
Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) Spermatozoa Osmotic Tolerance and Cryoprotectant Permeability Characteristics
J Androl, July 1, 2005; 26(4): 470 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. A. Ward, T. Kaneko, H. Kusakabe, J. D. Biggers, D. G. Whittingham, and R. Yanagimachi
Long-Term Preservation of Mouse Spermatozoa after Freeze-Drying and Freezing Without Cryoprotection
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2003; 69(6): 2100 - 2108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agca, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agca, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Agca, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS