Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. H.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 31, 819-825, Copyright © 1984 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

ARTICLES

Comparison of chromosomal abnormalities in hamster egg and human sperm pronuclei

RH Martin

One thousand human sperm and hamster egg haploid karyotypes were analyzed at the pronuclear stage after in vitro penetration. The frequency of abnormalities in human sperm was 8.5%, with 5.2% aneuploidy and 3.3% structural abnormalities. The hamster egg complements had an abnormality rate of 3.8%, with 3.3% aneuploidy and 0.5% structural abnormalities. In both human and hamster complements, chromosome abnormalities were observed in all chromosome groups, demonstrating that all chromosomes are susceptible to nondisjunction, not just acrocentric or small chromosomes. There is an intriguing difference between the frequency of hyperhaploid and hypohaploid complements in human sperm and hamster eggs. In the human complements, 2.4% were hyperhaploid and 2.7% hypohaploid. This is very close to the theoretical 1 to 1 ratio expected from nondisjunction. The hamster egg complements had more hypohaploid (2.2%) than hyperhaploid (0.9%) complements, despite identical treatment. Higher rates of hypohaploidy are generally ascribed to artificial loss of chromosomes, but may in fact reflect a predisposition of oocytes to anaphase lag during meiosis. The frequency of abnormalities (both numerical and structural) is higher in human complements than in hamster. This may reflect an innate propensity for meiotic chromosome abnormalities in humans or may result from greater exposure of humans to mutagenic agents.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
F. Pellestor, T. Anahory, and S. Hamamah
The chromosomal analysis of human oocytes. An overview of established procedures
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 15 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
F. Pellestor, B. Andreo, F. Arnal, C. Humeau, and J. Demaille
Mechanisms of non-disjunction in human female meiosis: the co-existence of two modes of malsegregation evidenced by the karyotyping of 1397 in-vitro unfertilized oocytes
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 2134 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.