Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heske, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heske, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heske, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. J.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 31, 97-103, Copyright © 1984 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

ARTICLES

Pregnancy interruption in Microtus ochrogaster: laboratory artifact or field phenomenon?

EJ Heske and RJ Nelson

Females of at least 8 species of rodent will terminate pregnancies after exposure to a "strange" male or his odors in the laboratory. Although only suggestive evidence exists for the occurrence of pregnancy interruption in the field, this laboratory phenomenon has been assigned important adaptive roles in the reproductive biology of rodents. In the present study, the extent of pregnancy interruption was investigated for prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) in semi-natural enclosures where continued close proximity to males or their stimuli was not necessarily enforced upon females. Heterosexual pairs of voles were housed together in large, out-of-doors enclosures. After 10 days either 1) the original pair remained together for 30 additional days, 2) the stud male was replaced with a strange male for 30 days during which time the stud male was absent, or 3) the stud male was allowed to remain with the female, but another male was also added. Other heterosexual pairs of voles were placed in small cages typical of previous laboratory studies; 10 days later, the original male was replaced by a strange male. Dates of parturition were recorded. The data indicate that pregnancy interruption can occur in situations where 1) the female can potentially avoid the strange male, 2) the female can repel the strange male via aggressive behavior, or 3) the stud male is present to defend his mate. The findings of this study are discussed in relation to the possible adaptive significance of pregnancy block for small rodents.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
K. Hacklander and W. Arnold
Male-caused failure of female reproduction and its adaptive value in alpine marmots (Marmota marmota)
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 1999; 10(5): 592 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
G. E. Demas, J. M. Williams, and R. J. Nelson
Amygdala but not hippocampal lesions impair olfactory memory for mate in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 1997; 273(5): R1683 - R1689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.