Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yochim, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yochim, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yochim, J. M.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 30, 637-645, Copyright © 1984 by Society for the Study of Reproduction


ARTICLES

Modulation of uterine sensitivity to decidual induction in the rat by nicotinamide; challenge and extension of a model of progestational differentiation

JM Yochim

A recently constructed model describes pyridine nucleotide metabolism as a key target of progesterone action during early progestational differentiation of the uterus ( progestation ). The present study was designed to challenge this model. Using uterine sensitivity to decidual induction as a "whole animal" index of preimplantational differentiation, nicotinamide (NAM) was administered as a probe, to test the model's validity. Pseudopregnant rats received NAM in two injections (100 mg each, i.p.) during a 3-h interval at selected times between 1200 h on Day 2 and 1200 h on Day 4. Deciduomata were induced by intrauterine instillation of phosphate buffer between 1800 h on Day 3 and 1200 h on Day 5. Uterine sensitivity was measured indirectly as uterine weight, 5 days after induction. The effect of NAM was dependent upon the time of its administration. Maximal sensitivity (1200 h on Day 4) was not altered by injection of NAM at 1200 h on Day 2, but was inhibited by 60% following injection at 1200 h on Day 3. After this period, the inhibitory effect of NAM was diminished. When NAM was injected at 1200 h on Day 4, a slight, but significant, augmentation of sensitivity was measured. These responses were predicted by the model. A comparison of the effects of NAM with those of progesterone suggested a mechanism of action for the hormone during early progestation .





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.