Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blank, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Desjardins, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blank, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Desjardins, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Blank, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Desjardins, C.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 30, 410-415, Copyright © 1984 by Society for the Study of Reproduction


ARTICLES

Spermatogenesis is modified by food intake in mice

JL Blank and C Desjardins

Spermatogenesis is generally viewed as being resistant to reduced food intake in inbred strains of adult mammals. This consensus stems from studies that have failed to place testicular responses within the context of a species' reproductive characteristics. We exposed two species of wild rodents, house mice and deer mice, to a mild but sustained food restriction (30% reduction of ad libitum consumption for 5 weeks). Reproductive adjustments made by each species to inanition were strikingly different. Food restriction failed to modify spermatogenesis in house mice, but evoked a continuum of testicular responses in deer mice ranging from normal spermatogenesis to azoospermia. These findings have several novel implications: 1) modest food restriction evokes species-specific adjustments in testicular function, and 2) intraspecific variation in spermatogenesis suggests robust individual differences in sensitivity to alterations in food intake. Taken together, our findings underscore the importance of considering the effects of food intake on male reproduction within the framework of a species' physiological and evolutionary background.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. A. Young, B. R. Zirkin, and R. J. Nelson
Testicular Regression in Response to Food Restriction and Short Photoperiod in White-Footed Mice (Peromyscus leucopus) Is Mediated by Apoptosis
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2000; 62(2): 347 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. Lucia, J. L. Chicharro, M. Perez, L. Serratosa, F. Bandres, and J. C. Legido.
Reproductive function in male endurance athletes: sperm analysis and hormonal profile
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1996; 81(6): 2627 - 2636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.