Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oxberry, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwald, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oxberry, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwald, G. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Oxberry, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwald, G. S.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 29, 1255-1263, Copyright © 1983 by Society for the Study of Reproduction


ARTICLES

Autoradiographic analysis of proestrous changes in the binding of 125I- labeled prolactin to the hamster ovary

BA Oxberry and GS Greenwald

Autoradiographic histochemistry was employed to examine changes in the binding of 125I-labeled prolactin (Prl) to ovaries from proestrous hamsters before (at 1200 h), during (at 1600 h), and after (at 2000 h) the preovulatory gonadotropin surge. In untreated control hamsters, there was a marked and progressive loss of Prl binding, first in the interstitial cells and follicular thecae by 1600 h, and then in the granulosa cells of the preovulatory follicles by 2000 h. When proestrous hamsters were treated with ergocryptine to significantly lower serum Prl, or injected with exogenous Prl, Prl binding to their ovaries did not differ from controls, suggesting that decreased Prl binding was due to neither increased occupancy of binding sites by endogenous Prl nor down regulation of Prl receptors by Prl itself. Conversely, when proestrous hamsters were treated with phenobarbital to block the luteinizing hormone (LH)/follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) surge, the loss of Prl binding sites in the ovaries was prevented, suggesting that the LH/FSH surge might initiate a down regulation of Prl receptors in the ovary. Such a down regulation of Prl receptors may serve as a mechanism by which the ability of Prl to affect periovulatory events in the ovary might be regulated.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.