Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, D. L., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M. P.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 29, 970-976, Copyright © 1983 by Society for the Study of Reproduction


ARTICLES

Effects of testosterone, dihydrotestosterone and estradiol on gonadotropin release after gonadotropin releasing hormone administration in cyclic mares

DL Thompson Jr, SI Reville-Moroz, DJ Derrick and MP Walker

Sixteen intact cyclic mares were treated on the fourth day of estrus and then every other day for a total of six injections with 1) testosterone propionate, 2) dihydrotestosterone (DHT) benzoate, 3) estradiol (E2) benzoate or 4) safflower oil. Mares were given gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) on Day 3 of estrus (pretreatment) and again 24 h after the last steroid or oil injection. Treatment with testosterone propionate resulted in a greater (P less than 0.05) follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) response to the second injection of GnRH compared with all other treatments. Treatment with DHT benzoate also resulted in greater (P less than 0.05) FSH response to GnRH compared with control and E2 benzoate-treated mares. Testosterone propionate and E2 benzoate administration suppressed (P less than 0.05) the normal diestrous rise in FSH concentrations exhibited by the control and DHT benzoate-treated mares. Steroid treatment did not affect the luteinizing hormone (LH) response to GnRH, although testosterone propionate treatment did suppress concentrations of LH in daily blood samples during Days 3 to 6 of treatment. It is concluded that testosterone's effect on FSH after GnRH treatment observed in this and previous experiments can be attributed to two different properties of the hormone or its metabolites acting simultaneously. That is, testosterone increased the secretion of FSH in response to GnRH as did DHT (an androgenic effect). At the same time, testosterone suppressed FSH concentrations in daily blood samples in a manner identical to that of E2 benzoate (an estrogenic effect).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
O.J Ginther, M.D Utt, M.A Beg, E.L Gastal, and M.O Gastal
Negative Effect of Estradiol on Luteinizing Hormone Throughout the Ovulatory Luteinizing Hormone Surge in Mares
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2007; 77(3): 543 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. A. Johnson, D. L. Thompson Jr., and J. A. Cartmill
Pituitary responsiveness to GnRH in mares following deslorelin acetate implantation to hasten ovulation
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2002; 80(10): 2681 - 2687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.