Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Acott, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hoskins, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Acott, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hoskins, D. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Acott, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hoskins, D. D.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 29, 389-399, Copyright © 1983 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

ARTICLES

Movement characteristics of bovine epididymal spermatozoa: effects of forward motility protein and epididymal maturation

TS Acott, DF Katz and DD Hoskins

Movement characteristics of untreated bovine caudal epididymal spermatozoa were compared by high-speed cinemicrography with those of theophylline-activated caput epididymal spermatozoa with and without added forward motility protein (FMP). Comparison of individual movement characteristics clearly established the importance of FMP in converting the nonprogressive motility of theophylline-activated caput sperm into the progressive swimming of mature caudal sperm. Although the total or curvilinear distance traveled in 1 sec by theophylline-activated caput sperm was not changed by the addition of FMP, the linear progression was doubled and the percentage of progressively motile sperm was tripled by this protein. Untreated caudal sperm were 80% motile and theophylline-activated caput sperm were nearly 50% motile; the percentage of motile sperm that were progressive was the same for theophylline-activated caput sperm with FMP and for untreated caudal sperm. Caput sperm without FMP roll infrequently, if at all, but caput sperm with FMP and caudal sperm roll at 4.7 Hz. The beat frequency increases significantly with the addition of FMP and is even higher for caudal sperm. The hydrodynamic power output rises concomitantly with the beat frequency. Perhaps the most striking difference between caput sperm without FMP and those with it is in the swimming paths they follow. Caput sperm without FMP exhibit frequent reversals in direction, or yawing of the sperm heads as they loop back and cross over their tails in an apparently very flexible bending. Their average swimming paths are circles. Caput sperm with FMP and caudal sperm do not show this behavior, but swim in average paths which are linear. The minimum radius of curvature of the tail of caput sperm without FMP is much smaller than that for the other two cell types. These studies clarify the role of FMP in epididymal development of sperm motility.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.