Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by STETSON, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by WATSON-WHITMYRE, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by STETSON, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by WATSON-WHITMYRE, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by STETSON, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by WATSON-WHITMYRE, M.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 14, 531-537, Copyright © 1976 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

Photoperiodism and Reproduction in Golden Hamsters: Circadian Organization and the Termination of Photorefractoriness

MILTON H. STETSON 1, KATHLEEN S. MATT 1, , and MARCIA WATSON-WHITMYRE 1

1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19711


The photorefractory period of the adult golden hamster is characterized by failure of the reproductive system to respond to short-day treatment with gonadal regression. The reproductive system of photorefractory hamsters remains functional irrespective of ambient photoperiod. Prolonged treatment with long days terminates photorefractoriness in hamsters, restoring the ability of the animals' hypothalamo-hypophysio-gonadal axis to respond to short daylengths. The basis of the photorefractory hamster’s ability to discriminate long from short days in terminating the refractory period is a circadian oscillation of photosensitivity.

Photorefractory hamsters were treated for 22 weeks with LD 14:10 (14 h of light daily), LD 6:18, LD 6:30, LD 6:42, or LD 6:54. They were then treated for 10 weeks with LD 6:18. Exposure for 22 weeks to LD 14:10, LD 6:30 or LD 6:54 terminated photorefractoriness; when challenged with 10 weeks of short day treatment these animals underwent testicular regression. Exposure for 22 weeks to LD 6:18 or LD 6:42 did not terminate photorefractoriness; further short day treatment of these animals had no effect on their fully mature reproductive systems. Thus, whether a photoperiod is interpreted as a long day or a short day in these hamsters depends on the phase relationship between the light presented and an endogenous oscillation of photosensitivity.

 Submitted on September 15, 1976
Accepted on January 16, 1976




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Biol RhythmsHome page
M. S. Saiovici, T. J. Nicholls, and B. K. Follett
Rapid Photoperiodic Responses in Japanese Quail: Is Daylength Measurement Based upon a Circadian System?
J Biol Rhythms, June 1, 1987; 2(2): 139 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.